Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Aziz Khan vs The Director And Joint Secretary
2021 Latest Caselaw 11219 Raj

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 11219 Raj
Judgement Date : 20 July, 2021

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Aziz Khan vs The Director And Joint Secretary on 20 July, 2021
Bench: Vijay Bishnoi

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5883/2021

1. Aziz Khan S/o Late Bashir Khan, Aged About 50 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 18, Purana Bas, Rajgarh, District Churu.

2. Taj Mohammed S/o Late Bashir Khan, Aged About 60 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 18, Purana Bas, Rajgarh, District Churu.

3. Mumtaz Khan S/o Late Bashir Khan, Aged About 45 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 18, Purana Bas, Rajgarh, District Churu.

4. Ramzan Khan S/o Late Shri Bashir Khan, Aged About 70 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 18, Purana Bas, Rajgarh, District Churu.

5. Gatu D/o Late Bashir Khan, Aged About 58 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 18, Purana Bas, Rajgarh, District Churu.

6. Dhapa D/o Late Bashir Khan, Aged About 55 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 18, Purana Bas, Rajgarh, District Churu.

7. Ruksana D/o Late Bashir Khan, Aged About 42 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 18, Purana Bas, Rajgarh, District Churu.

8. Bandi D/o Late Bashir Khan, Aged About 52 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 18, Purana Bas, Rajgarh, District Churu.

9. Anwar S/o Late Jamila D/o Late Bashir Khan, Aged About 40 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 18, Purana Bas, Rajgarh, District Churu.

10. Kalu S/o Late Jamila D/o Late Bashir Khan, Aged About 38 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 18, Purana Bas, Rajgarh, District Churu.

11. Imran S/o Late Jamila D/o Late Bashir Khan, Aged About 31 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 18, Purana Bas, Rajgarh, District Churu.

----Petitioners Versus

1. The Director And Joint Secretary, Department Of Local

(2 of 3) [CW-5883/2021]

Bodies, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

2. Municipal Board, Rajgarh, District Churu Through Chairman, Municipal Board, Rajgarh District Churu.

3. Executive Officer, Municipal Board, Rajgarh District Churu.

4. Chandratan S/o Shri Shiv Prasad Kaushik, Resident Of Ward No. 18, Purana Bas, Rajgarh, District Churu.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. A.S. Rathore

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI

Order

20/07/2021

This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners being

aggrieved with the order dated 25.02.2019 passed by the Director,

Local Bodies Rajasthan, Jaipur whereby, the revision petition

preferred by the petitioners under Section 327 of the Rajasthan

Municipalities Act, 2009 challenging the validity of the patta dated

08.11.2002 issued in favour of respondent- Chand Ratan by the

Municipality Board, Rajgarh, has been dismissed.

The Director, Local Bodies has dismissed the revision petition

filed by the petitioners while observing that there is a delay of

around 16 years in challenging the patta issued in favour of the

respondent- Chand Ratan though from the averments made by the

petitioners themselves in the revision petition, they were having

knowledge of issuance of patta in favour of respondent- Chand

Ratan since year 2006.

Learned counsel for the petitioners has argued that the

Director, Local Bodies has dismissed the revision petition filed by

the petitioners illegally solely on the ground of delay and,

therefore, the impugned order is liable to be set aside.

(3 of 3) [CW-5883/2021]

Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners and after

going through the material available on record, I do not find any

merit in this writ petition as the Director, Local Bodies has rightly

observed that the petitioners were aware about the issuance of

patta in favour of the respondent- Chand Ratan since year 2006

but they have preferred the revision petition after a long delay,

which has not been explained.

Otherwise also, the petitioners have challenged the validity

of the patta by way of filing a civil suit before the Additional

District and Sessions Judge, Rajgarh, District Churu in the year

2007, however, the said civil suit filed by the petitioners was

dismissed vide judgment and decree dated 08.01.2018 wherein,

the civil court has already observed that the patta issued in favour

of the respondent- Chand Ratan is not null and void.

In view of the above discussion, I do not find any case for

interference in this writ petition and the same is hereby dismissed.

Stay petition also stands dismissed.

(VIJAY BISHNOI),J

23-akash/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter