Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kuldeep Singh Mahala vs State Of Rajasthan
2021 Latest Caselaw 10668 Raj

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 10668 Raj
Judgement Date : 13 July, 2021

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Kuldeep Singh Mahala vs State Of Rajasthan on 13 July, 2021
Bench: Dinesh Mehta

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8786/2021

1. Kuldeep Singh Mahala S/o Shri Pratap Singh Mahala, Aged About 46 Years, Resident Of House No. 119, Ward No. 8, Vpo Chak Bhojasar, Tehsil Bhadra, District Hanumangarh.

2. Ramji Lal Gurjar S/o Shri Jagannath Gurjar, Aged About 42 Years, Resident Of Village Rampura, Via Kanota, Jamwa Ramgarh, District Jaipur.

3. Sangeeta Kumawat D/o Shri Ramvilas Kumawat, Aged About 33 Years, Resident Of 35 Shri Ram Nagar Vistar, 100 Ft. Road, Jaipur, District Jaipur.

4. Suresh Kumar Saini S/o Shri Ram Narayan Mali, Aged About 39 Years, Resident Of Basant Colony, Dausa, District Dausa.

5. Ganpat Ram S/o Shri Virdha Ram, Aged About 26 Years, Resident Of Village Mishri Ki Beri, Lukhu, Tehsil Dhorimanna, District Barmer.

6. Hanuman Singh S/o Shri Anop Singh, Aged About 32 Years, Resident Of Village Kharad, Tehsil Dhorimanna, District Barmer.

7. Prem Kumar Prajapati S/o Shri Ram Narayan, Aged About 31 Years, Resident Of 44 Ramdevra Ke Paas, Meghwal Basti, Village Kathoti, District Nagour.

----Petitioners Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner.

3. Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Rajasthan, Ajmer, Through Its Secretary.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Inderjeet Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Deepak Jangid

JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

Order

13/07/2021

(1) Mr. Yadav, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners

submits that the petitioners would be satisfied if respondent-RPSC

(2 of 2) [CW-8786/2021]

and State Government is directed to consider their representation

in the light of the judgment dated 3.11.2017 passed by Division

Bench of this Court in DBSAW No.1178/2017 : Rajesh Choudhary

& Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr. as many seats are lying

vacant due to non-joining and resignation.

(2) The present writ petition is therefore, disposed of with a

direction to the petitioners to file representation alongwith

certified copy of the order instant and photostat copy of the

Division Bench judgment in the case of Rajesh Choudhary (supra)

within a period of two weeks.

(3) On receipt of the representation, the respondent-RPSC and

the competent authority of the respondent-State shall do the

needful in accordance with law as early as possible preferably

within a period of eight weeks thereafter.

(4) It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the

petitioners' representation has been issued only with a view to

ensure expeditious redressal of petitioners' grievance. The same

may not be construed to be an order to decide the representation

in a particular manner.

(5) The stay application also stands disposed of accordingly.

(DINESH MEHTA),J 94-Ramesh/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter