Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 10379 Raj
Judgement Date : 8 July, 2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 2028/2021
Rekha Devi W/o Sh. Jawahar Singh, Aged About 43 Years, R/o
H.no. 10, Quadian Road, Niranjan Avenue, Batala, Teh. Batala,
Dist. Gurdaspur, Punjab Through His Power Of Attorney Holder
Gurjeet Singh S/o Joginder Singh, Aged About 60 Years, R/o
225, State Enclave, Focal Point, Ward No. 5, Rajpura, Teh.
Rajpura, Dist. Patiala (Punjab).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sangram Singh
For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.S. Bhati, PP
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
08/07/2021
1. In wake of second surge in the COVID-19 cases, abundant
caution is being maintained, while hearing the matters in Court,
for the safety of all concerned.
2. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.,
praying that the order dated 20.03.2021 passed by Additional
Chief Judicial Magistrate No.2, Chittorgarh be set aside whereby
the said court refused to release vehicle i.e. Tanker No.PB-06-V-
9226 alongwith material lying in it to the petitioner.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner stated at Bar that no
confiscation proceedings are pending qua the Tanker and the same
is case property of case FIR No.68/2021 registered at Police
Station Sadar, Chittorgarh.
(Downloaded on 08/07/2021 at 09:02:46 PM)
(2 of 2) [CRLMP-2028/2021]
4. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties.
5. The learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon
Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai Vs. State of Gujarat, (2002) 10
SCC 283, to contend that the Supreme Court has held that the
vehicle should not be permitted to remain parked in the police
station as same shall gather rust and shall not remain useful.
Relying upon the judgment of Supreme Court in the case of
Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai (supra), present petition is allowed
and the trial court is directed to release Tanker (PB-06-V-9226)
seized as case property by imposing following conditions:-
a) That the petitioner shall keep the vehicle so released
intact and shall not change its identification.
b) That the petitioner shall produce the vehicle as and when
trial court requires the same for proposed identification of
the case property.
c) That the petitioner shall execute Supurdaginama/
indemnity bond and bonds by two sureties to the satisfaction
of the trial court.
(d) The trial court is empowered to impose any or other
conditions in the Supurdaginama/indemnity bond and surety
bonds to be furnished by the petitioner and sureties, which it
may deem fit.
6. Needless to say, trial court shall make verification that the
petitioner is a registered owner of the vehicle.
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J.
53-Sudheer/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!