Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 10264 Raj
Judgement Date : 7 July, 2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 602/1999
Ram Singh S/o Raju Singh by caste Rajput R/o Sadolai. Teh. Kolayat, Distt, Bikaner
----Petitioner Versus
1. State of Rajasthan through Colonisation Tehsildar Kolayat.
2. The Assistant Colonisation Commissioner
3. The Deputy Colonisation Commissioner, Bikaner
4. The Board of Revenue for Rajasthan, Ajmer.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Varun Goyal For Respondent(s) : Mr. DK Joshi, AGC
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI
Judgment / Order
07/07/2021
This petition is directed against the order dated 10.09.1998
passed by the Board of Revenue, Rajasthan, Ajmer whereby
reference made by the Deputy Commissioner
(Colonisation),Bikaner, in purported exercise of power conferred
under Section 232 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 (Act of
1955) vide order dated 29.06.1998, for setting the order dated
16.06.84 passed by the Assistant Commissioner (Colonisation)
recording the names of petitioners as "Gair-Khatedar(s)" in the
revenue record, has been answered in favour of State, and the
order dated 16.06.84 has been set aside.
With the consent of the parties, the matter is heard at this
stage.
(2 of 2) [CW-602/1999]
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners contended that
the controversy involved in the instant petition stands covered by
Bench decision of this Court in DBSAW No.789/2003-
RamzanKhan Vs. State of Rajasthan, wherein after due
consideration of all the relevant aspects this Court held that
Deputy Commissioner(Colonisation) is not competent to make
reference in exercise of powers conferred under Section 232 of the
Act of 1955.
The issue raised in the petition being squarely covered by
decision in Ramzan Khna's case is not disputed by the
counselappearing for the respondent-State.
Accordingly, in the light of Bench decision of this Court in
Ramzan Khan's case (supra), the writ petition is allowed.
Theorder impugned dated 10.09.1998 passed by the
Board of Revenue, Ajmer in Reference Case No.63/98 R.T.
Act/Bikaner, is set aside. However, it is made clear that the
competent authority shall not be precluded from making reference
afresh in accordance with law.
(VIJAY BISHNOI),J
Surabhii/45-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!