Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Golu S/O Parmanand vs State Of Rajasthan
2021 Latest Caselaw 585 Raj/2

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 585 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 21 January, 2021

Rajasthan High Court
Golu S/O Parmanand vs State Of Rajasthan on 21 January, 2021
       HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                   BENCH AT JAIPUR

       S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.
                              15717/2020

1.     Golu S/o Parmanand, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Kathon
       Ps Devli Manji Dist. Kota Rural (At Present Accused
       Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Kota)
2.     Hanshraj S/o Brijmohan, Aged About 22 Years, R/o
       Kandafal Ps Devli Manji Dist. Kota Rural (At Present
       Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Kota)
                                                                 ----Petitioners
                                   Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
                                                                ----Respondent

Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15911/2020 [email protected] S/o Bhairu Lal, R/o C.i.d. Colony Ps Simliya Dist. Kota Rural Raj. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Kota)

----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nitin Kumar Sharma present in the Court Mr. Shyam Bihari Gautam for Mr. Dushyant Singh Naruka present in the Court For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mangal Singh Saini, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI

Judgment / Order

21/01/2021

1. Petitioners have filed these bail applications under Section

439 Cr.P.C.

2. F.I.R. No.0169/2020 was registered at Police Station Devli

(2 of 2) [CRLMB-15717/2020]

Manji, Kota Rural for offence under Sections 394 I.P.C.

3. It is contended by counsel for the petitioners that the

recovery has been effected. Petitioners are not having criminal

antecedents of like nature.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed these bail

applications.

5. I have considered the contentions.

6. Considering the contentions put forth by counsel for the

petitioners, I deem it proper to allow these bail applications.

7. These bail applications are, accordingly, allowed and it is

directed that accused-petitioners shall be released on bail

provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of

Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in

the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the

satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that they shall

appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter be

transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when

called upon to do so.

8. A copy of this order be sent to concerned S.H.O. for

recording this condition in the Village Crime Record Book so that

in the event of petitoners' repeating offence, S.H.O. can move the

Court for cancellation of bail.

9. A copy of this order be placed in connected file.

(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J ARTI SHARMA /35-36

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter