Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Jagdish vs State
2021 Latest Caselaw 2507 Raj

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2507 Raj
Judgement Date : 29 January, 2021

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Jagdish vs State on 29 January, 2021
Bench: Pushpendra Singh Bhati
     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                              JODHPUR
 S.B. Criminal Misc. 3rd Bail Application (Suspension of Sentence)
                           No.271/2020
                                           IN
                  S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 865/2017

Jagdish S/o Krishan Lal, By Caste Nayak, Resident Of Near
Hanuman Mandir, Nehra Nagar, Sri Ganganagar. At Present
Lodged In Central Jail, Sri Ganganagar.
                                                                          ----Appellant
                                       Versus
The State Of Rajasthan.
                                                                     ----Respondent


For Appellant(s)              :     Mr. Rakesh Matoria
For Respondent(s)             :     Mr. Sajjan Singh Rajpurohit, PP



        HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

                                        Order

29/01/2021
        In wake of onslaught of COVID-19, abundant caution is being

taken while hearing the matters in Court.

        Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the

impugned order.

        Counsel for the appellant has shown statement of prosecutrix

(PW-1), in which, the prosecutrix stated she was doing work of

labour whereas appellant was learning some work at the place.

The appellant repeatedly told that he was in love with her but she

used to refuse on the ground that she was engaged somewhere

else.    Regular telephonic talks are reflected. In a                     conversation

with the mother of the appellant, the prosecutrix stated that she is

unable     to   carry    on       relationship      because         she    is   engaged



                        (Downloaded on 30/01/2021 at 08:36:22 PM)
                                        (2 of 3)                [CRLA-865/2017]


somewhere else. They went to bus stand at Sri Ganganagar and

then travelled in a public transport to Rawatsar. Thereafter, they

remained together, although, the girl has alleges rape.

     Counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant is in

custody since 13.02.2002 and has served more than                08 years of

custody, out of the total ten years sentence awarded.

     Learned PP opposed the bail application in general.

     Having considered all the facts and circumstances of case,

without making any observation on the merits of case, we are

inclined to suspend the sentence of the appellant(s).

     Accordingly, this application for suspension of sentences is

allowed and it is directed that the sentences awarded to

appellant/s - Jagdish S/o Krishan Lal by the learned Special

Judge, Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act cases, Sri

Ganganagar by his judgment dated 24.04.2017 in Sessions Case

No.95/2016 (28/2016) shall remain suspended till final disposal of

aforesaid appeal provided he executes a personal bond for a sum

of Rs.50,000/- along with two solvent sureties in the sum of

Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for

his appearance before this Court on 25.02.2021 and whenever

called upon to do so till the disposal of the appeal on the

conditions indicated below:-



      (1)   That he/she/they will appear before the trial court in

      the month of January of every year till the appeal is

      decided.

      (2)   That if the applicant(s) changes the place of residence,

      he/she/they will give in writing his/her/their changed

                   (Downloaded on 30/01/2021 at 08:36:22 PM)
                                                                            (3 of 3)                [CRLA-865/2017]


                                         address to the trial court as well as to the counsel in the

                                         High Court.

                                         (3)   Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s), they

                                         will give in writing their changed address(s) to the trial

                                         court.



                                        The learned trial court shall keep the record of attendance of

                                   the accused-applicant(s) in a separate file. Such file be registered

                                   as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the

                                   accused-applicant(s) was/were tried and convicted. A copy of this

                                   order shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal

                                   Misc. file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose

                                   relating to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In

                                   case the said accused-applicant(s) does not appear before the trial

                                   court, the learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High

                                   Court for cancellation of bail.


                                                                 (DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J.

13-Sanjay/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter