Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

[email protected] S/O Shri Ramkishan vs State Of Rajasthan
2021 Latest Caselaw 1544 Raj/2

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1544 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 11 February, 2021

Rajasthan High Court
[email protected] S/O Shri Ramkishan vs State Of Rajasthan on 11 February, 2021
Bench: Pankaj Bhandari
          HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                      BENCH AT JAIPUR

          S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.
                                   15573/2020

[email protected] S/o Shri Ramkishan, Aged About 25 Years, R/o
Rajwada Tehsil Mundawar Dist. Alwar Raj. (At Present Confined
In Central Alwar Raj.)
                                                                            ----Petitioner
                                        Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
                                                                          ----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Krishan Kumar Chhawal For Complainant(s) : Mr. Anil Choudhary with Mr. Pallav Choudhary For State : Mr. Sher Singh Mahla, PP Investigating Officer : Mr. Jaipal, ASI, SHO, Khairwal

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI

Judgment / Order

11/02/2021

1. Petitioner has filed this bail application under Section

439 of Cr.P.C.

2. F.I.R. No. 363/2020 was registered at Police Station

Kherthal, P.S. District Bhiwadi for offence under Section 366 of

I.P.C.

3. It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that as per the

Aadhar Card, prosecutrix is a major. She went on her own free will

and solemnized marriage with petitioner. It is also contended that

she in her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. stated

that she went on her own free will.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant

(2 of 2) [CRLMB-15573/2020]

have opposed the bail application. It is contended that prosecutrix

is a child and as per the medical report, her age is between

sixteen to seventeen years. It is also contended that petitioner is

real maternal uncle's son and the marriage falls within prohibited

degree.

5. I have considered the contentions.

6. Considering the contentions put forth by counsel for the

State and counsel for the complainant, I am not inclined to

entertain the bail application.

7. This bail application is accordingly dismissed.

(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J

NIKHIL KR. YADAV /9

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter