Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Badrinaryan Yadav S/O Shri ... vs State Of Rajasthan
2021 Latest Caselaw 1331 Raj/2

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1331 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 8 February, 2021

Rajasthan High Court
Badrinaryan Yadav S/O Shri ... vs State Of Rajasthan on 8 February, 2021
Bench: Mahendar Kumar Goyal
        HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                    BENCH AT JAIPUR

        S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6530/2020

Badrinaryan Yadav S/o Shri Radheshyam Yadav, Aged About 29
Years, R/o Shyosinghpura, Dhanakiya Tehsil And Distt. Jaipur
Raj.
                                                           ----Accused-Petitioner
                                      Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.
                                                                    ....Respondent

2. Smt. Sumitra Devi Yadav W/o Badrinarayan D/o Shri Kajod Yadav, Presently Residing At Bad Pithawas, Lalyawali Dani, P.s. Kardhani, Distt. Jaipur Raj.

                                                 ----Complainant-Respondent


For Petitioner(s)           :    Mr. K.L.Meena for
                                 Mr. Arvind Sharma
For Respondent(s)           :    Mr. F.R. Meena, PP
For Complainant             :    Mr. Atul Bhardwaj



HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL

Order

08/02/2021

This criminal miscellaneous petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

has been filed for quashing the FIR No.0103/2020 dated

20.06.2020 registered at Police Station Mahila Thana, District

Jaipur (West) for offence under Sections 498-A & 406 of I.P.C.

Relying on the judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court of India in

case of B.S. Joshi & Ors. Vs. State of Haryana & Anr., 2003

(4) SCC 675, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that

since the matrimonial dispute between the parties has amicably

been settled; hence, the FIR in question be quashed.

                                                                        (2 of 2)                         [CRLMP-6530/2020]



                                         Learned   Public    Prosecutor         has     opposed           the   criminal

                                   miscellaneous petition.

                                         Learned    counsel       appearing            for        the      complainant

acknowledging the factum of compromise between the parties

submitted that he has no objection if the FIR in question is

quashed.

Heard learned counsels for the parties and perused the

record.

Undisputedly, the matrimonial dispute giving rise to FIR in

question has amicably been settled between the parties. In view

of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court of India in case of

B.S. Joshi (supra), this Court deems it just and proper to quash

the FIR in question.

Resultantly, this criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed.

The FIR No.0103/2020 dated 20.06.2020 registered at Police

Station Mahila Thana, District Jaipur (West) for offence under

Sections 498-A & 406 of I.P.C. is quashed.

(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J

Sudha/80

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter