Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dal Chand Chhipa vs State Of Rajasthan
2021 Latest Caselaw 19315 Raj

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 19315 Raj
Judgement Date : 17 December, 2021

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Dal Chand Chhipa vs State Of Rajasthan on 17 December, 2021
Bench: Arun Bhansali

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11904/2021

Dal Chand Chhipa S/o Shri Ram Chandra Ji Chhipa, Aged About 69 Years, By Caste Chhipa, R/o Mod Ka Nimbaheda, District Bhilwara (Raj.)

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary To The Government, Public Health Engineering Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur

2. The Chief Engineer (Rural), Public Health Engineering Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur (Raj.)

3. The Superintending Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department, Circle Bhilwara, Bhilwara (Raj.)

4. The Assistant Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department, Sub-Division Gangapur, Bhilwara (Raj.)

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shashank Sharma for Dr. Harish Purohit.

For Respondent(s) : Ms. Anjana Jawa.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI

Order

17/12/2021

After arguing for some time, learned counsel for

the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if the

respondents are directed to consider his representation, which he

would be filing (within a period of 15 days from today) in the light

of judgment rendered by this Court in Sohan Lal Mathur Vs. State

of Rajasthan (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3631/2008), decided on

17.11.2008, which has subsequently been confirmed up till the

Hon'ble Apex Court in SLP No.14932/2012.

(2 of 2) [CW-11904/2021]

The writ petition is, therefore, disposed of with a direction to

the petitioner to file representation indicating his pay scale and

ventilating his grievance along with a copy of the judgment dated

17.11.2018 rendered in the case of Sohan Lal Mathur (supra) and

a certified copy of the order instant within a period of two weeks

from today.

If such representation is so addressed, the competent

authority shall consider the same and do the needful in

accordance with law within a period of eight weeks thereafter.

It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the

petitioner's representation has been issued only with a view to

ensure expeditious redressal of petitioner's grievance. The same

may not be construed to be an order to decide the representation

in a particular manner.

Stay petition also stands disposed of accordingly.

(ARUN BHANSALI),J

12-pradeep/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter