Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 19101 Raj
Judgement Date : 15 December, 2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11683/2021
Bheru Lal Sen S/o Shri Nandlal Ji, aged 62 Years, R/o Mejadam Road, Bus Stand, Village- Pansal, District Bhilwara (Raj.).
----Petitioner Versus
1. State of Rajasthan through the Principal Secretary to the Government, Public Health Engineering Department, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. The Chief Engineer (Rural), Public Health Engineering Department, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur (Raj.).
3. The Superintending Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department, Circle Bhilwara, Bhilwara (Raj.).
4. The Assistant Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department, Rural Sub-Division Bhilwara (Raj.).
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shashank Sharma on behalf of Dr. Harish Purohit.
For Respondent(s) : Ms. Anjana Jawa.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI
Order
15/12/2021
After arguing for some time, learned counsel for
the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if the
respondents are directed to consider his representation, which he
would be filing (within a period of 15 days from today) in the light
of judgment rendered by this Court in Sohan Lal Mathur Vs. State
of Rajasthan (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3631/2008), decided on
17.11.2008, which has subsequently been confirmed up till the
Hon'ble Apex Court in SLP No.14932/2012.
(2 of 2) [CW-11683/2021]
The writ petition is, therefore, disposed of with a direction to
the petitioner to file representation indicating his pay scale and
ventilating his grievance along with a copy of the judgment dated
17.11.2018 rendered in the case of Sohan Lal Mathur (supra) and
a certified copy of the order instant within a period of two weeks
from today.
If such representation is so addressed, the competent
authority shall consider the same and do the needful in
accordance with law within a period of eight weeks thereafter.
It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the
petitioner's representation has been issued only with a view to
ensure expeditious redressal of petitioner's grievance. The same
may not be construed to be an order to decide the representation
in a particular manner.
Stay petition also stands disposed of accordingly.
(ARUN BHANSALI),J 20-DJ/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!