Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dinesh Kumar vs State Of Rajasthan
2021 Latest Caselaw 18899 Raj

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 18899 Raj
Judgement Date : 13 December, 2021

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Dinesh Kumar vs State Of Rajasthan on 13 December, 2021
Bench: Rameshwar Vyas

(1 of 3) [SOSA-648/2021]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S. B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 648/2021

Dinesh Kumar S/o Shankar Lal Ahari Meena, aged about 37 years, R/o Jhuthri Phala Kapuriya, Police Station Kherwada, District Udaipur.

(At present lodged in Central Jail, Udaipur)

----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jitendra Ojha For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shrawan Kumar Bishnoi, P.P.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESHWAR VYAS

Order

13/12/2021

The petitioner has been convicted and sentenced as below

vide Judgment dated 29.09.2021 passed by Additional Sessions

Judge, Kherwada, District Udaipur in Sessions Case

No. 73/2016 (CIS No. 73/2016) :-

Offence Sentences Fine Fine Default sentences u/s 376 IPC 10 years RI Rs.10,000/- 6 months SI u/s 451 IPC 2 years RI Rs.1,000/- 1 month SI u/s 504 IPC 2 years RI Rs.1,000/- 1 month SI All sentences shall run concurrently

The petitioner has moved this application under Section 389

Cr.P.C. seeking suspension of sentences awarded to him by the

trial court.

(2 of 3) [SOSA-648/2021]

Learned Public Prosecutor has not chosen to file reply to the

application for suspension of sentences and proposes to argue the

matter orally.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public

Prosecutor and perused impugned judgment and original record of

the case.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner

was on bail during trial. He further submits that the prosecutrix is

a major and married lady. This is a case of consent. He further

submits that the appeal is not likely to be heard in near future. In

the above circumstances, he prays to allow this application for

suspension of sentences and release the petitioner on bail.

On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed

the application for suspension of sentences.

Having regard to the rival submissions and after perusal of

the record as also considering the facts and circumstances of the

case more particularly the fact that the petitioner was on bail

during trial, this Court is inclined to accept the application for

suspension of sentences and to release the petitioner on bail

during the pendency of the appeal.

Accordingly, this application for suspension of sentence filed

under Section 389 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the

sentences passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Kherwada,

District Udaipur vide Judgment dated 29.09.2021 in Sessions Case

No. 73/2016 (CIS No. 73/2016) against the petitioner - Dinesh

Kumar S/o Shankar Lal Ahari Meena, shall remain suspended

till final disposal of the aforesaid appeal and he shall be released

on bail, provided he executes a personal bond in the sum of

(3 of 3) [SOSA-648/2021]

Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the

satisfaction of the trial Judge for his appearance in this Court on

27.01.2022 and whenever ordered to do so till the disposal of the

appeal on the conditions indicated below:-

1. That he will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.

2. That if the petitioner changes the place of residence, he will give in writing his changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.

3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s), they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.

The trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of the

accused-petitioner in a separate file. Such file be registered as

Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the accused-

petitioner was tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also

be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall

not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to

pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said

accused petitioner does not appear before the trial court, the trial

Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for cancellation of

bail.

(RAMESHWAR VYAS),J

32-Inder/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter