Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 18628 Raj
Judgement Date : 7 December, 2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 222/1995
Ahmed Ali
----Appellant Versus Sh. Sanatan Dharma Sabha
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Narendra Thanvi For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order
07/12/2021
Counsel for the appellant submits that despite giving notice
to the appellant, he has not contacted to the counsel and
therefore, he pleads no instructions for the appellant.
A perusal of record reveals that this second appeal has been
filed against the eviction decree dated 11.03.1992 passed by
learned Civil Judge, Churu in Civil Suit No.27/81 which was
affirmed by the first appellate court vide judgment dated
26.07.1995. The second appeal is pending since 1995.
The rented premises is one varanda and the eviction decree
has been passed on the ground of material alteration, in the
varanda.
It appears that with passage of time the appellant lost
interest in pursuing the second appeal and therefore, he has not
contacted to the appellant, to pursue the appeal.
(2 of 2) [CSA-222/1995]
In view of above, the present civil second appeal is hereby
dismissed for non prosecution.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J
12-Anshul/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!