Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Costar Group Inc vs Arcgate Teleservices Private ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 18461 Raj

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 18461 Raj
Judgement Date : 3 December, 2021

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Costar Group Inc vs Arcgate Teleservices Private ... on 3 December, 2021
Bench: Vijay Bishnoi, Arun Bhansali

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR D.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 384/2021

1. Costar Group Inc., A Corporation Registered Under The Laws Of The State Of Delaware And Having Its Principal Place Of Business At 1331 L Street, Nw, Washington, District Of Columbia 20005, United States Of America.

2. Co Star Realty Information, Inc., A Corporation Registered Under The Laws Of The State Of Delaware And Having Its Principal Place Of Business At 1331 L Street, Nw, Washington, District Of Columbia 20005, United States Of America. (Plaintiffs)

----Appellants Versus

1. Arcgate Teleservices Private Limited, A Company Incorporated Under The Companies Act, 2013 Having Its Registered Office At G1-10 I.t. Park, Madri Industrial Area, Udaipur, Rajasthan 313001.

2. M/s Arcgate, A partnership firm having registration no.17/26/78/2005 and having its registered office at G- 11 I.T. Park, Madri Industrial Area, Udaipur, Rajasthan 313001

----Respondents

For Appellant(s) : Mr M.S.Singhvi Sr. Advocate assisted by Mr Muktesh Maheshwari Mr Aidan Choudhary Mr Nishit Shah For Respondent(s) : Mr Vikas Balia Mr Falgun Buch Mr Prateek Gattani Mr Karan Lahiri (through VC)

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI

Judgment / Order

03/12/2021

(2 of 3) [CMA-384/2021]

This appeal has been filed by the appellants aggrieved

against the order dated 23.03.2021 passed by Commercial Court,

Udaipur, whereby the prayer of the appellant for grant of ex parte

ad interim injunction was declined.

An application has been filed by the parties under Order

XXIII Rule 3 CPC seeking passing of a compromise decree based

on the settlement arrived at between the parties.

By order dated 26.11.2021, the record of the suit

No.29/2021 from the Commercial Court, Udaipur was summoned,

which has been received.

Learned counsel for the parties made submissions that

as the parties have settled their dispute mutually, which has been

reduced in the consent terms and permanent injunction filed as

Annexure-A/1, the suit itself along with the present appeal may be

decided in terms of the said settlement arrived at between the

parties.

In the circumstances of the case, wherein the parties in

the present appeal are seeking disposal of the suit pending before

the Commercial Court, Udaipur, exercising powers under Section

24 CPC, the Civil Original Suit No.29/2021 along with pending

applications is withdrawn to this Court.

In view of the submissions made, the suit and pending

applications are disposed of in terms of the settlement/

compromise arrived at between the parties annexed as Annexure-

A/1 to the application filed under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC.                      The




                                                                             (3 of 3)               [CMA-384/2021]


decree be drawn. The consent terms and permanent injunction

shall form part of the decree.

The present appeal also stands disposed of.

Information regarding disposal of the suit be sent to

the Commercial Court, Udaipur.

(ARUN BHANSALI),J (VIJAY BISHNOI),J

1-masif/-PS

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter