Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4058 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 26 August, 2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9207/2021
Dariyav Singh S/o Shri Haripal Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o
Village Bai, Tehsil Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd., Through Its Managing
Director, Vidyut Bhawan, Panchsheel Nagar, Makadwali
Road, Ajmer-305004
2. Secretary (Admn.), Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd.,
Vidyut Bhawan, Panchsheel Nagar, Makadwali Road,
Ajmer-305004
3. Superintending Engineer, Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd.,
Jhunjhunu.
4. Assistant Engineer (O And M), Gudha Gaurji, District
Jhunjhunu (Raj.)
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sandeep Garssa For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH Order 26/08/2021
This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging
the transfer order dated 12.08.2021 whereby the petitioner has
been transferred from AEN (O & M), AVVNL, Gudha Gaurji, District
Jhunjhunu to Asind, District Bhilwara.
Counsel further submits that petitioner is low paid employee
and he has been transferred to another district.
The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of Punjab and
Sind Bank & Ors. Vs. Durgesh Kuwar, reported in AIR 2020 SC
3040 in para-17 has held as under :-
(2 of 2) [CW-9207/2021]
"17. We must begin our analysis of the rival submissions by adverting to the settled principle that transfer is an exigency of service. An employee cannot have a choice of postings. Administrative circulars and guidelines are indicators of the manner in which the transfer policy has to be implemented. However, an administrative circular may not in itself confer a vested right which can be enforceable by a writ of mandamus. Unless an order of transfer is established to be malafide or contrary to a statutory provision or has been issued by an authority not competent to order transfer, the Court in exercise of judicial review would not be inclined to interfere. These principles emerge from the judgments which have been relied upon by the appellants in support of their submissions and to which we have already made a reference above. There can be no dispute about the position in law".
This writ petition filed by the petitioner deserves to be
dismissed; for the reasons; firstly, the petitioner who is an
employee of the Corporation cannot claim to serve at a particular
place of his choice; secondly, by order dated 12.08.2021 as many
as 23 employees have been transferred by the respondent(s) due
to administrative exigency and; lastly, in the facts and
circumstances of the present case, I am not inclined to exercise
the jurisdiction of this Court under Article-226 of Constitution of
India.
Hence, this writ petition is dismissed.
(INDERJEET SINGH),J
CHETNA BEHRANI /92
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!