Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 13039 Raj
Judgement Date : 24 August, 2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4111/2018 Pooja Midha Daughter Of Shri Madan Gopal, By Caste Arora, Resident Of E-22, Bhujia Factory Road, Bhoop Colony, Tehsil And District Sriganganagar Raj..
----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan Through The Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur Raj..
2. The Secretary, Department Of Elementary Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur Raj..
3. The Director, Elementary Education, Zone Bikaner, Bikaner Raj..
4. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, District Pali Raj..
5. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, District Sriganganagar Raj..
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Himmat Jagga
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishi Soni
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
24/08/2021
1. By way of the present writ petition, petitioner has sought
direction to the respondents to reshuffle the appointment/select
list as various candidates have not joined or has joined in other
subjects.
2. A reply to the writ petition has been filed indicating therein
that the exercise of reshuffle has been done and the candidate
have been allotted posting in accordance with the merit position
they were entitled to.
(2 of 2) [CW-4111/2018]
3. Mr. Jagga, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in
identical writ petition being SB Civil Writ Petition No.2902/2018
rendered in case of Manju Kumari Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.
was pending before Jaipur Bench of this Court and the same may
have some bearing.
4. In response to petitioner's above referred contention, Mr.
Rishi Soni, learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits
that issue in case of Manju Kumari (supra) was entirely different
and the same involved a question relating to additional subject -
English in the graduation. He submits that said writ petition too
has been disposed of by the judgment of Jaipur Bench vide order
dated 21.08.2018 and the same has hardly any bearing on the
issue in hand.
5. Having regard to facts and circumstances of the case, since
petitioner's basic grievance has been appropriately addressed, the
writ proceedings are hereby closed.
6. Needless to observe that in case the petitioner is not
satisfied with the posting provided to her (Kota), she shall be free
to agitate her cause by way of preferring a fresh writ petition.
7. Stay petition also stands disposed of accordingly.
(DINESH MEHTA),J 14-Amar/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!