Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Lrs Of Prem Singh Ranawat vs State Of Rajasthan
2021 Latest Caselaw 12635 Raj

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 12635 Raj
Judgement Date : 12 August, 2021

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Lrs Of Prem Singh Ranawat vs State Of Rajasthan on 12 August, 2021
Bench: Dinesh Mehta

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10650/2021

1. Lrs Of Prem Singh Ranawat, Through

2. Smt. Sushila Kanwar W/o Late Sh. Prem Singh, Aged About 60 Years, B/c Ranawat, R/o Village Pichhoriya Kheda, Post Lakhola, Tehsil Gangapur, District Bhilwara.

3. Devendra Singh S/o Sh. Prem Singh, Aged About 35 Years, B/c Ranawat, R/o Village Pichhoriya Kheda, Post Lakhola, Tehsil Gangapur, District Bhilwara.

4. Bhagwat Singh S/o Sh. Prem Singh, Aged About 30 Years, B/c Ranawat, R/o Village Pichhoriya Kheda, Post Lakhola, Tehsil Gangapur, District Bhilwara.

----Petitioners Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayat Raj Deptt. Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. Principal Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayat Raj Deptt. Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur.

3. Panchayat Samiti Gangrar, Through Vikas Adhikari, District Chittorgarh.

4. Director, Pension Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Govt.

Secretariat, Jaipur.

                                                                ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)        :     Mr. Anil Vyas, through Cisco Webex
For Respondent(s)        :



                    JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

                                Judgment

12/08/2021

(1) The petitioners have preferred the present writ petition with

the grievance that though their propositus late Sh. Prem Singh

Ranawat, who was in service of Panchayati Raj Department has

retired on 15.10.2018, but neither during his life time nor after his

(2 of 2) [CW-10650/2021]

death (on 12.5.2021), his retirement dues have been paid;

petitioner no.1, his wife is deprived of family pension as well.

(2) Mr. Anil Vyas, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners

submits that the petitioners would be satisfied if the respondents

are directed to consider the notice for demand of justice dated

1.4.2021 sent on behalf of the deceased employee expeditiously.

(3) The present writ petition is, therefore, disposed of with a

direction to the petitioners to file comprehensive representation

alongwith photostat copy of the notice for demand of justice dated

1.4.2021 and a certified copy of the order instant within a period

of three weeks from today.

(4) The competent authority of the respondent shall consider the

same and do the needful as early as possible preferably within a

period of twelve weeks of receiving the representation.

(5) It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the

petitioner's representation has been issued only with a view to

ensure expeditious redressal of petitioner's grievance. The same

may not be construed to be an order to decide the representation

in a particular manner.

(6) The stay application also stands disposed of accordingly.

(DINESH MEHTA),J

117-CPGoyal/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter