Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Durgesh Choudhary vs State Of Rajasthan
2021 Latest Caselaw 12568 Raj

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 12568 Raj
Judgement Date : 11 August, 2021

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Durgesh Choudhary vs State Of Rajasthan on 11 August, 2021
Bench: Dinesh Mehta

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4305/2021

Durgesh Choudhary W/o Shri Puna Ram Choudhary, Aged About 30 Years, D/o Shri Veer Singh Choudhary, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Bankaliya , Tehsil Pipar City, Distt. Jodhpur, Rajasthan.

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Medical And Family Welfare Department, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

2. Secretary, Medical Health Department And Mission Director, Nhm, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

3. Director, Medical And Health Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

4. Additional Director (Administration), Medical And Health Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

5. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Jodhpur, District Jodhpur, Rajasthan.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Ms. Vandana Bhansali

JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

Judgment

11/08/2021

(1) By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner has sought

change of her category from OBC (Creamy Layer) to OBC-NCL.

(2) While pointing out that the selection process is over and

select list has been issued, Ms. Bhansali, learned counsel

appearing for the respondents submits that the issue involved in

the present writ petition is squarely covered vide judgment dated

(2 of 3) [CW-4305/2021]

18.02.2021, passed by this Court in Anju Lata Sharma Vs. State

of Raj. & Anr. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2175/2021.

(3) In the case of Anju Lata Sharma (supra), this Court has held

as under:-

"14. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, this Court is of the view that the Division Bench judgment rendered in case of Kavita Choudhary (supra) is not of much help to the petitioner, particularly when the respondents themselves have granted an opportunity to all the candidates to edit their application form and carry out requisite amendment if there was any error; whereas such opportunity was not granted by the State in case of Kavita Choudhary (supra).

15. That apart, this Court in its judgment dated 04.08.2017, in Pritam Kunwar (supra) after considering almost all the judgments on the issue has held that a candidate cannot claim change of category once the process has reached at a substantially advanced stage.

16. In the present case, the provisional select list has been issued and perhaps that is when, the petitioner realised that had she applied under the EWS category, she would have secured berth in the select list.

17. The petitioner having failed to take due care and to avail opportunity to amend/edit her application form has also not even filed any representation before the issuance of provisional select list. Thus, she cannot be granted any relief at this stage.

18. For the reasons above mentioned, the present petition, therefore, fails."

(4) In view of the aforesaid adjudication, the present writ

petition is also disposed of.

(3 of 3) [CW-4305/2021]

(5) Stay petition also stands disposed of accordingly.

(DINESH MEHTA),J

20-CPGoyal/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter