Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kamal Singh Tak vs The State Of Rajasthan
2021 Latest Caselaw 12495 Raj

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 12495 Raj
Judgement Date : 10 August, 2021

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Kamal Singh Tak vs The State Of Rajasthan on 10 August, 2021
Bench: Dinesh Mehta

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9208/2021

Kamal Singh Tak S/o Goverdhan Singh Tank, Aged About 34 Years, Inside Maru Gate, Charbhuja Road, Amet, District Rajsamand (Raj.).

----Petitioner Versus

1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Local Self Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. The Director, Local Self Government, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

3. The Municipal Board, Amet, District Rajsamand, Through Its Executive Officer.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Devki Nandan Vyas, through Cisco Webex App For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Parihar, through Cisco Webex App

JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

Order

10/08/2021

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the

issue raised by the petitioner in the present writ petition is

squarely covered by judgment in the case of Jitendra Kumar Tailor

v. The State of Rajasthan & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition

No.1952/2019, decided on 06.07.2020, which in turn had relied

on order in the case of Roshan Lal Saini v. State & Ors. : S.B. Civil

Writ Petition No.18056/2015, decided on 09.03.2017.

In the case of Jitendra Kumar Tailor (supra), a Co-ordinate

Bench of this Court inter alia directed as under:

(2 of 2) [CW-9208/2021]

"In this view of the matter, I deem it just and appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the State Govt. to decide the matter at the earliest to facilitate issuance of requisite order of regularization of petitioner's services, strictly in accordance with law. The requisite exercise be undertaken by the State Govt. at the earliest, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date presentation of this order."

Learned counsel for the respondents, is not in a position to

dispute the fact that the issue raised in the present writ petition is

covered by judgment in the case of Jitendra Kumar Tailor (supra).

In view of the above fact situation, the writ petition filed by

the petitioner is disposed of, in light of and with similar directions

as given in the case of Jitendra Kumar Tailor (supra).

(DINESH MEHTA),J 265-Rahul/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter