Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 12135 Raj
Judgement Date : 3 August, 2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR D.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 167/2021
Ganesh, S/o Akhma, By Caste Pargi Meena, R/o Gulabpura Police Thana Kuan, District Dungarpur (Raj.). (At Present Lodged In Central Jail Udaipur).
----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Home Department, Jaipur.
2. Collector, Dungarpur.
3. Superintendent, Central Jail, Udaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : By post.
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Farzand Ali, G.A.-cum-A.A.G. with
Mr. Abhishek Purohit
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Judgment
03/08/2021
The convict-petitioner has forwarded this letter petition from
jail seeking to assail the adverse recommendations dated
22.12.2020 drawn in the meeting of the District Parole Advisory
Committee, Doongarpur whereby the application for first parole of
twenty days filed on his behalf has been rejected.
The Committee rejected the parole application of the convict-
petitioner on the ground that the convict and the victim's family
are relatives and reside in close proximity in the same village and
thus, if he is released on parole, there would be imminent risk to
(2 of 3) [CRLW-167/2021]
the petitioner's safety as animosity still prevails between the
parties. The apprehension of breach of peace and unrest was also
a reason assigned in the adverse recommendations to deny first
parole to the convict-petitioner.
We find that the reasons assigned in the adverse
recommendations dated 22.12.2020 for denying parole to the
petitioner are absolutely mechanical, vague and extraneous and
are not based on justifiable grounds so as to deny parole to the
convict petitioner more particularly when the Social Welfare
Department has recommended for release of the convict-petitioner
on parole and his mother Smt. Manjula has given undertaking that
in case, her son, the convict-petitioner Ganesh is released on first
parole, she shall ensure that he shall not indulge in any such acts
which may cause breach of peace in the society. Suffice it to say
that maintaining law and order situation is the duty of the State
machinery and by merely citing such reason, the authorities
cannot shirk their responsibilities.
In this background, we are inclined to accept the
instant parole writ petition which is hereby allowed. The
adverse recommendations dated 22.12.2020 are struck down qua
the convict-petitioner and it is ordered that the convict Ganesh
S/o Shri Akhma shall be released on first parole of twenty days
upon his furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.80,000/- with
two sureties of Rs.40,000/- each to the satisfaction of
Superintendent Central, Jail, Udaipur on the usual terms and
conditions. The Superintendent, Central Jail, Udaipur shall be at
liberty to impose other adequate and reasonable conditions to
(3 of 3) [CRLW-167/2021]
ensure return of the convict to the custody after availing the
parole. The term of parole shall be computed from the date of his
actual release.
(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J (SANDEEP MEHTA),J 20-Sudhir Asopa/Devesh/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!