Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vikram vs State Of Rajasthan
2021 Latest Caselaw 9120 Raj

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 9120 Raj
Judgement Date : 8 April, 2021

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Vikram vs State Of Rajasthan on 8 April, 2021
Bench: Sandeep Mehta

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2055/2021 Vikram S/o Sh. Banwari Lal, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Ratanpura, Tehsil Nohar, Dist. Hanumangarh (Raj.). (At Present Lodged In Sub Jail, Nohar).

                                                                  ----Petitioner
                                   Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
                                                                ----Respondent


For Petitioner(s)        :     Mr. D.S. Gharsana
                               Mr. Suresh Nehra
For Respondent(s)        :     Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi, P.P.



           HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA

                         Judgment / Order

08/04/2021

The instant bail application under Section 439 CrPC has

been preferred by the petitioner Vikram S/o Banwari Lal, who is in

custody in connection with the F.I.R. No.511/2020 registered at

the Police Station Nohar, District Hanumangarh for the offences

under Sections 384, 376-D, 342, 506 and 34 IPC.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the

material available on record.

The prosecutrix is a major married woman aged 25

years having two children from her wedlock with one Sandeep

Kumar. She went missing from the matrimonial home on

05.11.2020, on which, Sandeep Kumar lodged Missing Person

Report No.35/2020 at the Police Station Nohar. The lady was

traced out on 17.11.2020 and her statement was recorded on the

very same day, wherein she alleged that she left the matrimonial

(2 of 3) [CRLMB-2055/2021]

home on 05.11.2020 at about 07.00 a.m. leaving behind her two

minor children and went to Sirsa. From Sirsa, she called her

husband's cousin brother Vikram on phone and informed him that

she was standing at Sirsa bus stand and that he should reach

there. On her instruction, Vikram reached there. She stated that

her husband was habitual of drinking liquor and used to harass

and humiliate her and therefore, she left her husband's house.

She further stated that nobody had allured her and nor was she

subjected to any illicit act. Nearly 15 days after the lady returning

to her husband's home, the FIR came to be lodged, wherein it is

alleged that the petitioner had taken some obscene videos of the

complainant while she was bathing. The complainant was

blackmailed by showing the videos and in his manner, the

petitioner would take liberties with her and subjected her to rape

on a number of occasions. On the threat given by the petitioner,

she collected her Aadhaar Car, Voter I.D. Card etc. and went to

the village bus stand, where Vikram was present from before.

Both boarded a bus and went to Sirsa. At Sirsa, she was made to

stay at the house of a relative of the present petitioner, where the

petitioner subjected her to rape. From there, she was taken to

Hisar and then to Aadampur Mandi, where she was kept in a guest

house. There also the petitioner subjected her to rape. Then the

petitioner took her to Sirsa, where too, she was subjected to rape

by the petitioner. Then they proceeded to Chittorgarh alongwith

Bhura Ram. At Chittorgarh, she was kept confined in a village

named Kachumara, where the petitioner and Bhura Ram subjected

her to forcible sexual assault for about 8-10 days. She was made

to sign some blank papers.

(3 of 3) [CRLMB-2055/2021]

Be that as it may. The petitioner has been arrested in

this case and has been remanded to judicial custody.

Learned counsel Mr. Gharsana submits that as a matter

of fact, a case of consensual relations plain and simple has been

given the colour of rape in the highly belated FIR. He, thus, urges

that the petitioner deserves indulgence of bail.

Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions

advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner. However, he

makes a statement after perusing the case diary that no indecent

clips of the prosecutrix have been recovered by the Investigating

Officer during investigation.

In this background and having regard to the entirety of

the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant

indulgence of bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, the instant bail application under Section

439 CrPC is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner

Vikram S/o Banwari Lal arrested in connection with F.I.R.

No.511/2020 registered at the Police Station Nohar, District

Hanumangarh shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a

personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/-

each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the

stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and

as and when called upon to do so.

(SANDEEP MEHTA),J

83-Pramod/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter