Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rajesh Siyag vs State Of Rajasthan
2021 Latest Caselaw 9101 Raj

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 9101 Raj
Judgement Date : 8 April, 2021

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Rajesh Siyag vs State Of Rajasthan on 8 April, 2021
Bench: Dinesh Mehta

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5363/2021

1. Rajesh Siyag S/o Shri Uma Ram Siyag, Aged About 37 Years, R/o 25/b Vyas Colony Air Force, Ratanada Jodhpur (Raj.).

2. Varsha Joshi D/o Shri Om Prakash Chhangani, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Shivpuri, Near Ved Bhawan, Phalodi, Jodhpur (Raj.).

----Petitioners Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Rural Development And Panchayati Raj, Secretariat, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

2. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Jodhpur, District Jodhpur.

3. The Vikas Adhikari, Panchayat Samiti Bawari, Jodhpur District Jodhpur (Raj.).

4. The Vikas Adhikari, Panchayat Samiti Phalodi, Jodhpur District Jodhpur (Raj.).

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. JS Bhaleria For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manish Tak

JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

Order

08/04/2021

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that, petitioners'

case is squarely covered by judgment rendered in the case of

Babu Lal Meena & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (SBCWP

No.144/2015) decided on 01.09.2015, particularly in relation to

his entitlement for notional benefits as contained in direction No.3

of the judgment aforesaid.

(2 of 2) [CW-5363/2021]

The writ petition is, therefore, disposed of with a direction to

the petitioner to file a detailed representation seeking notional

benefits in light of judgement of Babu Lal Meena (supra), within a

period of two weeks.

In case, representation aforesaid is filed, the respondents

shall consider the same and confer the benefits to the petitioner in

accordance with law, preferably within a period of eight weeks of

receipt of the representation.

It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the

petitioner's representation has been issued only with a view to

ensure expeditious redressal of petitioner's grievance. The same

may not be construed to be an order to decide the representation

in a particular manner.

The stay application also stands disposed of accordingly.

(DINESH MEHTA),J 46-Rahul/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter