Friday, 12, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Parikshit vs State Of Haryana
2026 Latest Caselaw 4013 P&H

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 4013 P&H
Judgement Date : 30 April, 2026

[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Parikshit vs State Of Haryana on 30 April, 2026

                     CRM-
                     CRM-M-16622-
                           16622-2026
                                                                                                               1




                     207
                                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                                                       CHANDIGARH

                                                           CRM-
                                                           CRM-M-16622-
                                                                 16622-2026

                     Parikshit
                                                                                                        ....Petitioner
                                                                    versus
                     State of Haryana
                                                                                                     ....Respondent

                     Date of Decision: April 30,
                                             30, 2026
                                                 2026
                     Date of Uploading: April 30, 2026

                     CORAM:               HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL

                     Present:
                     Present              Mr. Shokeen Singh Verma, Advocate and
                                          Ms. Neha Nehra, Advocate for the petitioner.

                                          Ms. Priyanka Sadar Thakur, Senior DAG Haryana.

                                                                     *****
                     SUMEET GOEL,
                            GOEL, J. (ORAL)

Present petition is the second attempt filed under Section 482 of

the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'BNSS') for grant of

concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner petitioner, in case FIR No.468 dated

31.12.2025,, under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 3(5) of the BNS, 2023 (Section

117(2) of BNS added later on), at Police Station Tosham, District Bhiwani Bhiwani.

2. On 27.03.2026, the he following order was passed:

"Apprehending his arrest in FIR No. 468 dated 31.12.2025 (Annexure P-1) registered under Sections 109(1), 115 (2), 3(5) of BNS (later on added 117(2) of BNS), at Police Station Tosham, District Bhiwani; the petitioner has preferred the second petition under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking pre pre-arrest bail.

Counsel for the petitioner, inter alia, contends that assuming arguendo,, the prosecution version available at this juncture is taken to be correct, the petitioner is alleged to have been present at the spot; no specific injury is attributed to the petitioner; the petitioner is a man with clean antecedents & is willing to join investigation and cooperate therein.

Notice of motion.

authenticity of this order/ judgment CRM-

CRM-M-16622- 16622-2026

On the strength of advance notice; Mr. Gurmeet Singh, AAG, Haryana has entered appearance on behalf of the respondent-State of Haryana.

Adjourned to 30.04.2026.

The petitioner is directed to appear before the Investigating Officer on 02.04.2026 at 11:00 A.M. in concerned Police Station and join investigation. In the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on interim bail subject to his furnishing personal/surety bond(s) to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer/Investigating Officer. As and when further called by Investigating Officer, the petitioner shall join the investigation. He shall abide by the condition(s) enumerated under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023."

3. Learned State Counsel (on instructions) has stated that pursuant

to the order dated 27.03.2026, the petitioner has joined the investigation;

however, his custodial interrogation is required to identify the place of the

scuffle and to recover the weapon in question.

4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal

of the record; especially in view of the factum of the petitioner having joined

investigation and his custodial interrogation being sought only to identify the

place of the scuffle and to recover the weapon in question; the interim order

dated 27.03.2026 passed by this Court is made absolute, subject to the

conditions as enumerated under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023.

5. Petition stands allowed, allowed accordingly.

6. This order should not be treated as "blanket" order. It will not

be read granting petitioner indefinite protection from arrest. It shall be

confined to the FIR mentioned ibid and will not operate in respect of any

other incident that involves commission of an offence.

7. Liberty is reserved in favour of State/complainant to move for

cancellation/recall of this order in case the petitioner violates any condition

stipulated under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023 or upon showing any other

sufficient cause.

authenticity of this order/ judgment CRM-

CRM-M-16622- 16622-2026

8. Needless to say that anything observed herein above shall not

be construed to be an opinion on the merits of the case.

9. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

(SUMEET GOEL) JUDGE April 30, 2026 mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No

Whether reportable: Yes/No

authenticity of this order/ judgment

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter