Friday, 12, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Balkar Singh Alias Lovepreet vs State Of Punjab
2026 Latest Caselaw 3911 P&H

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 3911 P&H
Judgement Date : 28 April, 2026

[Cites 6, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Balkar Singh Alias Lovepreet vs State Of Punjab on 28 April, 2026

Author: Jasjit Singh Bedi
Bench: Jasjit Singh Bedi
                           CRM-M-2041-2026
                                                              ::1::


                                (207) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                                                   CHANDIGARH

                                                                        CRM-M-2041-2026 (O & M)
                                                                        Date of Decision: 28.04.2026

                           Balkar Singh @ Lovepreet

                                                                                          ... Petitioner
                                 Versus

                           State of Punjab                                             ...Respondent


                           CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI
                           Present:    Mr. Karandeep Singh Sidhu, Advocate
                                       for the petitioner.

                                       Mr. M.S. Toor, AAG, Punjab.

                                              ****
                           JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J.

The prayer in this fourth petition under Section 483 BNSS, 2023

is for the grant of regular bail in case bearing FIR No.34 dated 21.11.2022

under Sections 21/29/61/85 of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic

Substances Act, 1985 (later on added Section 25 of the NDPs Act and

25/25(1) of the Arms Act, 1959) registered at Police Station SSOC, District

Amritsar.

2. The brief facts of the case are that Sukhvir Singh @ Kala and

Bindu Singh @ Binder (since granted the concession of regular bail vide

order dated 09.01.2026, Annexure P-6) were apprehended with 13 kg of

heroin on 22.11.2022 The aforementioned persons named one Manpreet

Singh (Since granted the concession of regular bail vide order dated

24.01.2023 passed by the Judge, Special Court, Amritsar, Annexure P-3)

CRM-M-2041-2026 ::2::

along with Balkar Singh @ Lovepreet Singh. Both Manpreet Singh and

Balkar Singh @ Lovepreet Singh (petitioner) were arrested on 22.11.2022.

Manpreet Singh got recovered a broken phone whereas from Balkar Singh @

Lovepreet Singh the recovery of five AK 47 rifles, five pistols .30 bore,

magazines and cartridges came to be effected. Manpreet Singh disclosed that

the master mind of the operation was his father Harbans Singh (expired in

police custody on 20.01.2023). Manpreet Singh also named one BSF

personnel namely, Gurnam Singh who has not been nominated in the present

case as an accused. On the disclosure statements of Manpreet Singh and

Balkar Singh @ Lovepreet Singh, the Investigating Agency made an attempt

to arrest Harbans Singh S/o Tula Singh. On 28.12.2022 they conducted a raid

at his house but could not find him. However, on the basis of a secret

information Jaswinder Singh @ Jassa (since granted the concession of regular

bail vide order dated 10.09.2025, Annexure P-5), Sandeep and Amandeep

Singh (granted bail vide common order dated 07.10.2023, Annexure P-4)

were nominated as accused. From Jaswinder Singh @ Jassa 500 grams of

heroin came to be recovered, from Sandeep Singh 500 grams of heroin came

to be recovered but from Amandeep Singh no recovery has been effected.

Thereafter, on 19.01.2023 Harbans Singh and Surinder Singh (granted bail

vide common order dated 07.10.2023 Annexure P-4) were arrested and from

the jacket worn by Harbans Singh 1 kg of heroin came to be effected.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner

has been falsely implicated in the present case. No contraband has been

recovered at his instance. Recovery of weapons has been foisted upon him.

CRM-M-2041-2026 ::3::

As he is in custody since 22.11.2022 but only 01 of the 42 prosecution

witnesses has been examined so far, the Trial of the present case is not likely

to be concluded anytime soon and therefore, he is entitled to the concession of

bail.

4. The learned counsel for the State, on the other hand, contends

that the allegations against the petitioner are grave inasmuch as 05 AK 47

rifles, 05 pistols .30 bore, magazines and cartridges have been recovered at

his instance. It is a case of narco-terrorism with cross-borders ramifications.

The petitioner is also an accused in one other case under the NDPS Act

arising out of FIR No.282/2022 dated 06.11.2022 under Sections 21/29 of the

NDPS Act, Police Station Gurhar Sahai. Therefore, keeping in view the

nature of the allegations levelled, he is not entitled to the concession of bail.

He, however, concedes that the petitioner is in custody since 22.11.2022 and

only 01 of the 42 prosecution witnesses has been examined so far.

5. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties.

6. As per the case of the prosecution, Sukhvir Singh @ Kala and

Bindu Singh @ Binder were apprehended with 13 kgs. of heroin. The

aforesaid persons named one Manpreet Singh and Balkar Singh @ Lovepreet

Singh (petitioner). On the arrest of the petitioner, the recovery of 05 AK 47

rifles, 05 pistols .30 bore, magazines and cartridges has been effected. On

conviction, the petitioner could be sentenced for upto 14 years imprisonment

even under the Arms Act. The allegations against the petitioner are grave. It

is apparent that the petitioner and his co-accused are involved in cross-border

narco-terrorism. Additionally, he is an accused in one other case under the

CRM-M-2041-2026 ::4::

NDPS Act bearing FIR No.282/2022 dated 06.11.2022 under Sections 21/29

of the NDPS Act, Police Station Gurhar Sahai. Therefore, the satisfaction that

he has not committed the offence in question and is not likely to commit one

in future cannot be recorded.

7. In view of the aforementioned facts and circumstances, I do not

deem it appropriate to grant the concession of bail to the petitioner and

therefore, the present petition stands dismissed.

8. The pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of

accordingly.

(JASJIT SINGH BEDI) JUDGE

28.04.2026 sukhpreet Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter