Friday, 12, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ishan vs Lovedeep Singh And Anr
2026 Latest Caselaw 3891 P&H

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 3891 P&H
Judgement Date : 28 April, 2026

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Ishan vs Lovedeep Singh And Anr on 28 April, 2026

Author: Archana Puri
Bench: Archana Puri
                                                         1
           TA-717-2024




                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                                       AT CHANDIGARH

           Sr. No.156
                                                                                TA-717-2024
                                                                 Date of Decision: 28.04.2026

           ISHAN

                                                                                 ....Applicant
                                                      Versus



           LOVEDEEP SINGH AND ANOTHER
                                                                             .....Respondents

           CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI

           Present:-            Mr. V.G. Jauhar, Advocate
                                for the applicant.

                                Mr. H.P.S. Ghuman, Advocate
                                for the respondents.

                                      *****

           ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral)

The applicant-Ishan (minor son of respondent No.1-Lovedeep Singh),

through his mother-Jasvir Kaur, has filed the present application for seeking

transfer of the civil suit i.e. CS/19/2023, titled 'Ishan Vs. Lovedeep Singh

and another', pending in the Family Court (Camp Court) Nabha, District

Patiala and he seeks transfer of the same to the Court of competent

jurisdiction at Sangrur.

In pursuance of notice issued, the respondents made appearance

through counsel and filed reply. Even, rejoinder was filed.

Counsel for the parties heard.

TA-717-2024

At the very outset, it is submitted by the counsel for the

applicant that the marriage of the mother of the applicant, was solemnized

with respondent No.1-Lovedeep Singh, on 13.02.2011. From the said

wedlock, the applicant was born on 05.09.2014 and he is presently about

11½ years old. On account of matrimonial dispute, his parents are residing

separate. The applicant, along with his mother, is residing at the house of his

grandfather-Rajinder Singh, in village Kheri, District Sangrur. The

applicant, being a minor and student, has to face loss of studies and incur

difficulties in pursuing the civil suit, which is pending at Nabha. The

distance between the two places is stated to be about 45 kms.

Furthermore, counsel submits that the applicant, as well as his

mother, had filed the petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C., against respondent

No.1. The executions are also pending in the Courts at Sangrur. The

respondent is pursuing the said cases. As such, a prayer has been made for

transfer of the civil suit.

On the other hand, counsel for the respondents, while making

reference to the reply, submits that the applicant has not come to the Court

with clean hands. In fact, earlier also, the suit was filed in the Courts at

Sangrur and vide order dated 22.09.2023, the Court had returned the plaint,

with regard to the objection to territorial jurisdiction. Only thereafter, the

civil suit in hand, has been filed. Also, it is submitted that the transfer of the

civil suit, is not maintainable, as the property in question, exists within the

jurisdiction of Nabha, District Patiala.

However, in the rejoinder, the applicant has stated about the

detail of pending litigation between the parents of the applicant. As per the

TA-717-2024

details so furnished, two criminal miscellaneous petitions are pending before

this Court, two execution petitions are pending in the Courts at Sangrur and

one criminal case, relating to the matrimonial dispute of other brother of

respondent No.1, is also pending in the Courts at Sangrur.

In view of the submissions aforesaid, at the very outset, it is

pertinent to mention that while considering the transfer application, various

factors ought to be taken into consideration. There cannot be any cast iron

formula, to be applied in all the cases, while adjudicating on the transfer

applications. Each case has to be decided in its own factual background.

One distinctive circumstance may alter the fate of the transfer application.

In the case in hand, the applicant is son of respondent No.1-

Lovedeep Singh, who has a matrimonial dispute with his wife-Jasvir Kaur,

through whom, the present application has been filed. It is pertinent to

mention that other litigation, which is pending between the parents of the

applicant, relates to the execution petitions only and no evidence is required

to be recorded therein. In the given circumstances, it is also pertinent to

notice that the distance between the two places is only 45 kms. Both

Sangrur and Nabha have good road connectivity. Moreover, the civil suit is

pending since the year 2023. In fact, the suit has been filed, as apparent,

through his mother only. Furthermore, the suit, which is sought to be

transferred, is of civil nature and as such, the presence of the mother of the

applicant, is not required on each and every date of hearing. Also, the age of

the applicant is not such, which calls for personal attention/care of the

mother all the time. Otherwise also, the applicant along with his mother, is

residing at his grand-parents' place. As such, in the absence of the mother of

TA-717-2024

the applicant, while coming to court, he can be taken care of by his grand-

parents.

In view of the aforesaid fact situation, there is no justifiable

ground made out, to accept the application.

Hence, the transfer application is hereby dismissed.

Anyhow, the applicant, as well as his mother, always has an

option to file an application for making appearance before the Court

concerned, as and when required, through virtual mode and upon filing of

such application, the Court concerned shall consider the same and pass an

appropriate order, in the fitness of circumstances.

(ARCHANA PURI) 28.04.2026 JUDGE Himanshu Vats

Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes

Whether reportable : Yes/No

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter