Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 3661 P&H
Judgement Date : 22 April, 2026
CRM-M-67680-2025 (O&M) 1-
260
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-67680-2025 (O&M)
Date of decision: 22.04.2026
ASLAM KHAN
...PETITIONER
VERSUS
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER
...RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL
Present: Ms. Anmol Thakur, Advocate for
Mr. Sandeep Arora, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Akash Yadav, AAG, Punjab.
Mr. G.S. Rawat, Advocate
for respondent No.2.
***
SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL J.
1. Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.26 dated 02.04.2025 under
Sections 498-A, 495 Indian Penal Code, Police Station Women Cell, District
Jalandhar Police Commissionerate and all consequential proceedings arising
therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 19.11.2025.
2. On 19.02.2026 and 18.03.2026, this Court directed the parties to
appear before learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate for recording of their
statements on the basis of compromise dated 19.11.2025.
3. In compliance of the aforesaid order, parties appeared before
learned JMIC, Jalandhar on 25.03.2026. Statement of Investigating Officer
ASI Tarsem Kaur was also recorded on 25.03.2026. Learned JMIC,
Jalandhar has submitted her report recording satisfaction that all the parties
have entered into a valid compromise without any influence or coercion.
CRM-M-67680-2025 (O&M) -2-
Point-wise report as under has been submitted:
"1. It is respectfully submitted that in compliance to the
directions issued by the Hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court,
vide order dated 19.02.2026 and 18.03.2026, passed in CRM-M-
67680 of 2025, statements of complainant Taj Bibi, D/o Sh. Bashir
Hussain, resident of Patti Barri Ki, Village Jaindiala, Tehsil
Phillar, Distt Jalandhar, accused Aslam Khan son of Sh. Anwar
Hussian, Resident of Borcherting 90, 22309, Hamburg, Germany
at present r/o Village Mauli, Tehsil Phagwara, Distt Kapurthala
and Investigating Officer ASI Tarsem Kaur, No.493, posted at PS
Women Cell, Jalandhar recorded by theundersigned. The parties
were duly identified by their respective counsels and IO.
2. Complainant Taj Bibi, D/o Sh. Bashir Hussain, resident
of Patti Barri Ki, Village Jaindiala, Tehsil Phillar, Distt Jalandhar
suffered statement to the effect that she is the complainant in the
present FIR no. 26 dated 02.04.2025, under Section 498-A, 495
IPC, P.S. Women Cell, Jalandhar. She has compromised the
matter with the accused Aslam Khan son of Sh. Anwar Hussian,
Resident of Borcherting 90, 22309, Hamburg, Germany at present
r/o Village Mauli, Tehsil Phagwara, Distt Kapurthala in FIR no.
26 dated 02.04.2025, under Section 498-A, 495 IPC, P.S. Women
Cell, Jalandhar with the intervention of respectable persons. She
has entered into compromise without any pressure, coercion and
undue influence vide compromise deed dated 19.11.2025,
photocopy of which is Ex. P1. She is the only
complainant/injured/aggrieved person in the present case. No
CRM-M-67680-2025 (O&M) -3-
other civil or criminal case is pending between them. She has no
objection if the present FIR is quashed against the accused Aslam
Khan. The quashing petition may kindly be accepted in view of the
terms and conditions of the compromise and above mentioned FIR
and other consequential proceedings may kindly be quashed.
3. Similarly, the statement of accused namely Aslam Khan
son of Sh. Anwar Hussian, Resident of Borcherting 90, 22309,
Hamburg, Germany at present r/o Village Mauli, Tehsil
Phagwara, Distt Kapurthala was also recorded, wherein he has
stated that he has compromised the matter with the complainant
Taj Bibi, D/o Sh. Bashir Hussain, resident of Patti Barri Ki,
Village Jaindiala, Tehsil Phillar, Distt Jalandhar with regard to
FIR no. 26 dated 02.04.2025, under Section 498-A, 495 IPC, P.S.
Women Cell, Jalandhar with the intervention of respectable
persons, vide compromise deed dated 19.11.2025, photocopy of
which is Ex. Pl. The compromise is genuine and arrived with free
will, consent and without any pressure, coercion and undue
influence. He is not involved in any other criminal case or any
other FIR. He has not been declared proclaimed person/offender
in any criminal case. No other case is pending between them.
Therefore, the present FIR may kindly be quashed in view of the
above said compromise.
4. Further, IO ASI Tarsem Kaur No.493, posted at PS
Women Cell, Jalandhar has suffered statement that she is
Investigating Officer in the present FIR no. 26 dated 02.04.2025,
CRM-M-67680-2025 (O&M) -4-
under Section 498-A, 495 IPC, P.S. Women Cell, Jalandhar. There
is only accused in the present FIR namely Aslam Khan and one
complainant/aggrieved person namely Taj Bibi in the present case,
who have appeared and made statement in the court. The accused
is not involved in any other FIR and has not been declared
proclaimed person/offender in the present case or any other
proceedings or any FIR. No other criminal case is pending against
the accused. It is also stated by her that during investigation of the
present case, no additional accused has been added in the present
FIR nor there has been any addition or deletion of any offence
after the registration of the FIR. No investigation is pending
against any of the accused nor any accused has been declared as
innocent during investigation in the present case. He has further
stated that challan has not been presented in the present case and
is under investigation.
5. As per the record available with the court of undersigned
and the statement of the IO ASI Tarsem Kaur No.493, posted at PS
WomenCell, Jalandhar, there is only one accused namely Aslam
Khan son of Sh. Anwar Hussain and one
complainant/injured/aggrieved person namely Taj Bibi D/o Sh.
Bashir Hussain in the present FIR no. 26 dated 02.04.2025, under
Section 498-A, 495 IPC, P.S. Women Cell, Jalandhar and both of
them have appeared and made statement in the court. No accused
is absconding or declared Proclaimed person/ offender in the
present case nor any criminal case or proceedings have been
initiated or pending against them. As per the statement given by
CRM-M-67680-2025 (O&M) -5-
IO, during investigation of the present case, no additional accused
has been added in the present FIR nor there has been any addition
or deletion of any offence after the registration of the FIR. No
investigation is pending against any of the accused nor any
accused has been declared as innocent during investigation in the
present case. The challan has not been presented in the present
case. On the basis of statements given by the accused and the
complainant, this Court is of the considered view that compromise
effected between the parties is genuine and is effected voluntarily
without any pressure, coercion or undue influence from any
quarter."
4. Learned State counsel and learned counsel for respondent No.2
have not raised any dispute regarding the factum of compromise between
petitioner and respondent no.2.
5. Since the matter has been amicably settled between the parties,
continuation of the criminal proceedings would be an exercise in futility.
The dispute which has its genesis in a matrimonial discord, warrants
exercise of powers under Section 528 BNSS.
6. Following principles of law laid down by the Full Bench
Judgment of this Court in "Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab
and another" 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and Hon'ble Supreme Court in
"Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others" (2012) 10 SCC 303, the
petition is allowed.
7. FIR No.26 dated 02.04.2025 under Sections 498-A, 495 Indian
Penal Code, Police Station Women Cell, District Jalandhar Police
CRM-M-67680-2025 (O&M) -6-
Commissionerate and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, are
quashed qua the petitioner.
8. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) 22.04.2026 JUDGE Sumit Singla
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!