Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 9073 P&H
Judgement Date : 29 April, 2024
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:058410
Neutral Citation No. 2024:PHHC:058410
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
128
RSA-1443-1992 (O&M)
Date of decision: 29.04.2024
MOHENDERPAL KAUR AND OTHERS .........Appellants
VERSUS
PARAMJIT SINGH AND OTHERS ........Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ
*****
Present:- Mr. M.L. Saggar, Senior Advocate with
Ms. Armann Saggar, Advocate
for the appellants.
Mr. Satinder Khanna, Advocate
for respondents No.1 to 3.
(Through Video Confernencing).
*****
VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral)
CM-10641-C-2023
The instant application has been filed under Section 151 of
the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for pre-poning the date of hearing of
the main case.
Since the main case is listed for hearing today, the present
application has been rendered infructuous.
Disposed of as having become rendered infructuous.
RSA-1443-1992 (O&M)
The appellant-defendant is in an appeal against the
judgment passed by the Court of Sub Judge, First Class, Ludhiana in
Civil Suit No. 266 dated 04.09.82 and 121 dated 09.04.1984 decided
vide judgment and decree dated 14.11.1985 as well as the subsequent
dismissal of the appeal by the Additional District Judge, Ludhiana in
Civil Appeal No. 686/2/34/70/77/68 of 1986--87-90 vide judgment and
1 of 2
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:058410
RSA-1443-1992 (O&M) -2-
decree dated 27.05.1991.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants
contends that the parties have already entered into a settlement on
22.05.1993 (Annexure A-1). The aforesaid affidavit has been placed on
record by the appellant alongwith CM-10642-C-2023 under Order 23
Rules 3 of CPC to record the said compromise.
There is no representation on behalf of the respondents
No.1 to 3 and the counsel pleads that he has no instructions. He seeks
withdrawal of his power of attorney.
The compromise thus remains uncontroverted.
Learned Senior Counsel for the appellants further contends
that the appeal may be disposed of as not pressed in view of the
compromise effected between the parties at this stage which has already
been acted upon.
The present appeal is accordingly disposed of as not
pressed in view of the settlement amongst the parties as claimed by the
counsel for the appellant which has already been acted upon. Liberty is,
however, granted to the respondents to seek revival of the present
appeal in case the aforesaid statement with respect to the settlement
amongst the parties is found to be incorrect.
All the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, are
also disposed of.
(VINOD S. BHARDWAJ)
JUDGE
APRIL 29, 2024
Vishal sharma
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable : Yes/No
2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!