Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 17455 P&H
Judgement Date : 9 October, 2023
Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:130944
2023:PHHC:130944
CRM-M- 28759 of 2023 (O & M) ::1::
(279)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-28759 of 2023 (O & M)
Date of decision: 09.10.2023
Danish Arora ...... Petitioner(s)
V/s
State of Punjab and anr.
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI
Present: Mr. Dheeraj Mahajan, Advocate,
for the petitioner(s).
Ms. Ramta Chaudhary, DAG, Punjab.
Mr. Nimish Gautam, Advocate,
for Mr. Sukhveer Kaur, Advocate,
for the respondents No.2 to 5.
*****
JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (Oral)
The prayer in this petition is for quashing of FIR No. 208
dated 11.11.2022 under Sections 379-B IPC registered at Police Station
Ranjit Avenue, District Amritsar and all subsequent proceedings arising
therefrom on the basis of compromise (Annexure P-2).
Vide order dated 01.06.2023 this Court had directed the parties
to appear before Illaqa Magistrate for getting their statements recorded in
terms of certain parameters given in the aforesaid order dated 01.06.2023
with regard to the compromise (Annexure P-2).
In terms of the order dated 01.06.2023 passed by this Court
parties have appeared before the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Amritsar
1 of 3
Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:130944
2023:PHHC:130944
CRM-M- 28759 of 2023 (O & M) ::2::
and as per the report dated 04.10.2023 submitted to this Court, both the
parties have got recorded their respective statements in Court.
A perusal of the aforesaid report would show that the parties
have effected a genuine compromise without there being any pressure,
coercion or undue influence. In view of the compromise there is a remote
possibility of the complainant coming forward to support the prosecution
case. The powers under Section 482 Cr.PC can be exercised in such like
situation in order to prevent unnecessary vagaries of criminal trial to be
faced by the parties, when there are remote chances of conviction of the
accused. The compromise in question is found to be fully in
consonance with the direction issued by the Court in Kulwinder Singh
& Ors. Vs. State of Punjab 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and Gian
Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr., 2012(4) RCR (Crl.) 543.
Further, the learned counsel for the petitioners, while placing
reliance upon the judgments passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in
Jayrajsinh Digvijaysinh Rana Versus State of Gujarat and another,
2012(4) R.C.R. (Criminal) 589 and this Court in Joginder Singh & another
Vs. State of Punjab and another, CRM-M-23739- 2010 decided on
27.04.2011, Rajinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab & another, CRM-M-
37395-2016 decided on 16.05.2017, Bhoj Raj Vs. State of Punjab &
another, CRM-24945-2019 decided on 27.09.2019 and Vimal Kalra &
others Versus State of Punjab & another, CRMM-20355-2022, decided on
25.07.2022 submits that partial quashing of the FIR was possible on the
basis of a compromise.
2 of 3
Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:130944
2023:PHHC:130944
CRM-M- 28759 of 2023 (O & M) ::3::
Keeping in view the law laid down by this Court in the
aforementioned judgments and the report of the Chief Judicial Magistrate,
Amritsar, the FIR No. 208 dated 11.11.2022 under Sections 379-B IPC
registered at Police Station Ranjit Avenue, District Amritsar alongwith all
the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, are hereby quashed qua the
petitioner only.
Petition stands disposed of.
( JASJIT SINGH BEDI)
JUDGE
October 09, 2023
sukhpreet
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable : Yes/No
Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:130944
3 of 3
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!