Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3029 P&H
Judgement Date : 26 October, 2021
CRM-M-26258-2021 -1-
218
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
****
CRM-M-26258-2021
Date of Decision: 26.10.2021
****
Sampat
..... Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
..... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDIP AHLUWALIA
Present: Mr. Rushil Sharma, Advocate,
for the petitioner.
Mr. B.S. Sewak, Additional Advocate General, Punjab.
*****
SUDIP AHLUWALIA, J. (ORAL)
This is a petition filed on behalf of the petitioner for regular
bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in case FIR No.185, dated 27.12.2019, under
Sections 21-61-85 of the NDPS Act and Section 25 of the Arms Act
(Section 29 of the NDPS Act, Sections 54 and 59 of the Arms Act and
Section 201 of the IPC added later on), registered at Police Station Sadar,
District Hoshiarpur, Punjab.
2. The petitioner has remained in detention for more than 1 year
and 9 months since 27.12.2019.
3. According to the FIR, 295 grams of heroin was found from the
gear box of the gray coloured Polo Car bearing Registration No.PB-08-CT-
9223 which was seen to have been parked in an empty space of an area
Bassi Ghulam Hussain under suspicious circumstances. The present
petitioner Saurav Jindal was sitting on the co-driver's seat and co-accused
1 of 3
Sampat, who also happens to be owner of the car and was sitting on the
driver's seat were arrested by the police party.
4. Reliance of the petitioner in this regard is on the following
decisions passed by different Benches of this Court :-
1. CRM-M No.6687 of 2020 decided on 09.02.2021 titled as
'Avtar Singh Vs. State of Punjab'.
2. CRM-M No.41639 of 2020 decided on 16.12.2020 titled as
'Charanjit Singh @ Geji Vs. State of Punjab'.
3. CRM-M No.48987 of 2018 decided on 03.04.2019 titled as
'Gurmeet Singh Vs. State of Punjab'.
4. CRM-M No.10541 of 2020 decided on 18.03.2020 titled as
'Jaswinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab'.
5. In each of those decisions where contraband under the NDPS
Act was recovered from a vehicle and not directly from the person of any of
the apprehended accused, such person was permitted to be released on bail
as it was held that in the given circumstances it would be doubtful that such
recovery was made from the conscious possession of the person
apprehended.
6. Co-accused Saurav Jindal has already been granted regular bail
by this Court in CRM-M-36798-2020 on 12.10.2021. The present petitioner
is fully covered by the ratio of the above judgments, since he is admittedly
not even the owner of the car in question.
7. Trial in the case is likely to take some time. There is no record
of the petitioner's involvement in any other case under the NDPS Act.
8. In the circumstances, considering the long detention already
undergone by the petitioner, he is ordered to be released on bail subject to
appropriate terms and conditions to the satisfaction of the Ld. Trial Court/
2 of 3
Duty Magistrate concerned.
9. Disposed off.
26.10.2021 (SUDIP AHLUWALIA)
Apurva JUDGE
1. Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
2. Whether reportable: Yes/No
3 of 3
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!