Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kumari Jayanti Sinha vs The State Of Bihar
2026 Latest Caselaw 594 Patna

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 594 Patna
Judgement Date : 24 February, 2026

[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Patna High Court

Kumari Jayanti Sinha vs The State Of Bihar on 24 February, 2026

Author: Anshuman
Bench: Anshuman
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                   Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9583 of 2024
     ======================================================
     Kumari Jayanti Sinha Wife of Late Binay Kumar, resident of Village- Kesho
     Chak, P.S.- Masaurhi, District- Patna.

                                                        ... ... Petitioner/s
                                  Versus
1.   The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Social Welfare
     Department, Bihar Patna.
2.   The Director of Isolated Child Development Services, (ICDS), Social
     Welfare Department Bihar, Patna.
3.   The Sub- Divisional Commissioner, Patna.
4.   The Collector and District Magistrate, Patna.
5.   The District Program Officer, Social Welfare Department, Patna.
6.   The Child Development Program Officer (C.D.P.O.), Masaurhi, Patna.
7.   The Female Supervisor, Masaurhi, Social Welfare Department, Bihar Patna.
8.   Seema Kumari, Wife of Ankit Kumar @ Kabindra Kumar, Resident of
     Village- Vhadaura Malikana, P.S.- Masaurhi, District- Patna.

                                               ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr. Vijay Shankar Shrivastava, Advocate
     For the Respondent/s   :      Mr. Government Advocate 9
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN

                            ORAL JUDGMENT

      Date : 24-02-2026

                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

      counsel for the State.

                     2. The present writ petition has been filed for

      quashing of the order dated 14.06.2023 passed by the Collector

      cum District Magistrate, Patna in Anganwadi Appeal Case No.

      10/2019-20

(Annexure-6), as well as for quashing of the order

dated 28.08.2019 passed by the District Programme Officer, Patna High Court CWJC No.9583 of 2024 dt.24-02-2026

Patna in Anganwadi Appeal Case No. 56/2017 (Annexure-5).

Further prayer has been made for quashing of the selection of

respondent no.8 who has been selected/appointed on the post of

Sevika at Centre No. 233, Ward No. 9, Gram Panchayat-

Vhadaura, Block- Masaurhi, District- Patna in pursuant to order

dated 28.08.2019 passed in Anganwadi Appeal Case No.

56/2017. Further prayer has been made for directing the

respondents to issue selection/appointment letter in favour of the

petitioner and allow her to join on the post of Sevika at Centre

No. 233, Ward No. 9, Gram Panchayat- Vhadaura, Block-

Masaurhi, District- Patna in place of respondent no.8.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

the petitioner has appeared in the selection process of

Anganwadi Sevika and Sahayika and following the due process,

she was selected on 13.10.2017 for the post of Sevika and

thereafter, joined on 15.10.2017 and regularly discharging her

duty. In the meantime, the petitioner also participated in the Job

Course Training and in this regard, on 15.02.2018, the petitioner

granted a certificate from Rural Female Development Welfare

Institute through Anganwadi Training Centre, Ramchandarpur,

Biharsharif, Nalanda. Counsel further submits that after joining

of the petitioner, a complaint was filed against the petitioner Patna High Court CWJC No.9583 of 2024 dt.24-02-2026

which was entertained by the D.P.O bearing Anganwadi Appeal

Case No. 56/2017. After hearing both the parties, the D.P.O has

allowed the said Anganwadi Appeal Case No. 56/2017 in favour

of the respondent no.8 by cancelling the selection of the

petitioner, and at her place, the respondent no.8 was directed to

be joined. Counsel further submits that being aggrieved and

dissatisfied with the order dated 28.08.2019 passed by the D.P.O

in Anganwadi Appeal Case No. 56/2017, the petitioner has

preferred appeal before the Collector cum District Magistrate,

Patna bearing Anganwadi Appeal Case No. 10/2019-20 which

was also rejected vide order dated 14.06.2023.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner further

submits that the petitioner has passed matriculation examination

from the Bihar Sanskrit Education Board, Patna in the year

2014. The examination was commenced on 29.03.2014 and the

result was published on 26.09.2014, in which the petitioner had

obtained 83.71% marks. Accordingly, on 14.02.2015, the

petitioner obtained school leaving certificate from S.K. Sanskrit

Primary cum Middle School, Vishunpur, Jehanabad. Counsel

submits that the appointment of the petitioner taken place in the

light of the guidelines of 2016 for appointment of Anganwadi

Sevika & Sahayika. Counsel submits that her appointment is Patna High Court CWJC No.9583 of 2024 dt.24-02-2026

absolutely in accordance with guidelines and there is no

violation of any guidelines for her appointment. This aspect has

neither been considered by the D.P.O nor by the District

Magistrate, and the petitioner has been removed from the post

only due to the reason that she has earlier appeared in the

examination of matriculation from Bihar School Education

Examination Board. Counsel submits that the petitioner has

never used the said certificate of Bihar School Education

Examination Board and she has used only one certificate i.e.

certificate of Bihar Sanskrit Education Board, Patna. Counsel

submits that since, the petitioner has not violated the guidelines

of 2016 for appointment of Anganwadi Sevika & Sahayika,

therefore, the orders passed by the D.P.O and the District

Magistrate are absolutely illegal. He further submits that at the

time of rejection of petitioner's claim, the shelter of order

passed in C.W.J.C. No. 13190 of 2009 has been taken care of by

the Collector. Counsel submits that the facts and circumstances

of the said case is absolutely different from that of present case.

It is due to this reason, he submits that notice be issued upon

respondent no.8 and upon hearing the respondent no.8, this writ

petition be allowed in favour of the petitioner.

5. Learned counsel for the State, on the other hand, Patna High Court CWJC No.9583 of 2024 dt.24-02-2026

submits that this writ application of the petitioner is not

maintainable, as there is complete suppression. Counsel submits

that admitted position is that the petitioner had obtained two

certificates i.e. firstly, from the Bihar School Education

Examination Board in the year 1994 and secondly, from the

Bihar Sanskrit Education Board, Patna in the year 2014.

Counsel submits that the petitioner has appeared second time

only with a view to improve her result/marks. He further

submits that in the judgment of C.W.J.C. No. 13190 of 2009

(Amarjeet Singh Rathaur Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.) which

the petitioner herself attached in the writ petition as Annexure-8,

it has been indicated that whenever there are two certificates

obtained on same degree, the first certificate shall be taken into

consideration and the second certificate shall not be used for any

other purpose/service.

6. Upon hearing the parties and after going through

the records, it transpires to this Court that specific allegation

against the petitioner due to which her matter has been rejected

by the D.P.O as well as by the District Magistrate is that she has

earlier obtained certificate of matriculation in the year 1994

from the Bihar School Education Examination Board and

subsequently, in the year 2014, she has appeared in the Patna High Court CWJC No.9583 of 2024 dt.24-02-2026

examination of Bihar Sanskrit Education Board, Patna. And, it

has come in the record that the discrepancy has been found in

the date of birth recorded in the attached Aadhar Card and Voter

id card. In this regard, there is a specific finding of the Collector

in his order.

7. Upon perusal of the C.W.J.C. No. 13190 of 2009,

it transpires that this Court annulled the second certificate

stating that the second certificate shall not be permissible for the

petitioner to use the same for any purpose including the

appointment as a Panchayat Teacher.

8. In this background, this Court finds that there is

no merit in this writ petition. Hence, this writ petition stands

dismissed.

(Dr. Anshuman, J) Divyansh/-

AFR/NAFR
CAV DATE                     NA
Uploading Date             25/02/2026
Transmission Date            NA
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter