Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Manoj Saw vs The State Of Bihar Through The Director ...
2026 Latest Caselaw 554 Patna

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 554 Patna
Judgement Date : 19 February, 2026

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Patna High Court

Manoj Saw vs The State Of Bihar Through The Director ... on 19 February, 2026

Author: Arun Kumar Jha
Bench: Arun Kumar Jha
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                   Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.316 of 2024
          Arising Out of PS. Case No.-428 Year-2023 Thana- RAJAOLI District- Nawada
     ======================================================
     Manoj Saw S/o Late Domi Saw Resident of Village-Chautha, P.O.-Rajauli,
     P.S.-Rajauli, District-Nawada, Bihar-805125

                                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s
                                      Versus
1.   The State of Bihar through the Director General of Police, Old Secretariat,
     Patna. Patna
2.   The Inspector General of Police, Magadh Division, District-Nawada.
     Nawada
3.   The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Magadh Division, District-Nawada.
     Nawada
4.   The Superintendent of Police, Nawada, District-Nawada. Nawada
5.   The Deputy Superintendent of Police, P.O and P.S.-Rajuali, District-Nawada.
     Nawada.
6.   Xavier Lakra, Sub-Inspector-Cum-Investigating Officer, P.O. and P.S.-
     Rajuali, District-Nawada. Nawada.
7.   Sihvalik Yadav S/o Lalo Yadav Sakin-Chautha, P.S.-Rajuali, District-
     Nawada.
8.   Sideshwar Yadav S/o Lalo Yadav Sakin-Chautha, P.S.-Rajuali, District-
     Nawada.
9.   Satish Yadav S/o Karu Yadav Sakin-Chautha, P.S.-Rajuali, District-Nawada.
10. Naresh Yadav S/o Lakahan Yadav Sakin-Chautha, P.S.-Rajuali, District-
    Nawada.

                                               ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s   :        Mr.Abhinay Priyadarshi, Advocate
     For the Respondent/s   :        Mr. Sanjay Kumar, AC to GA-13
     ======================================================
        CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA
                         ORAL JUDGMENT

Date : 19-02-2026

The petitioner has filed the present writ petition

seeking following reliefs :

"(i) For issuance of appropriate writ/writs order/orders direction/directions for commanding the respondents to properly and Patna High Court CR. WJC No.316 of 2024 dt.19-02-2026

expeditiously investigate Rajuali P.S. Case No:-428 of 2023 lodged by the petitioner under Sections-306/34 of the Indian Penal Code on 09.08.2023 with the Rajuali Police Station.

(ii) For issuance of further appropriate writ/writs order/orders direction/directions to the respondents authorities to take immediate steps for investigation and collecting evidence so that the named accused persons in the F.I.R. may not temper with the evidence.

(iii) For issuance of further appropriate writ/writs order/orders direction/directions for a direction to I.O. i.e. Respondent No.6, Xavier Lakra to take coercive measures during the course of investigation against the named accused persons being respondents no:- 7 to 10.

(iv) For issuance of any other writ/writs order/orders direction/directions as it deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case".

2. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of State-

respondents, at the outset, submits that a final form has been

submitted in the said Rajaoli P.S. Case No.428 of 2023 way

back on 30.09.2023 and the case was found to be a case of

mistake of fact. Despite submission of closure report/final form,

the petitioner has filed the present writ petition seeking proper Patna High Court CR. WJC No.316 of 2024 dt.19-02-2026

investigation which is clearly misuse of process of law. Since

the final form has already been submitted, nothing remains in

the matter. The petitioner has also filed protest petition before

the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-III,

Nawada. Therefore, the present petition be dismissed with

heavy cost.

3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed a supplementary

affidavit bringing on record the fact about submission of final

form and filing of protest petition. The learned counsel further

submits that the entire investigation was biased and flawed,

resulting in a grave miscarriage of justice. Thus, the learned

counsel prays for re-investigation in the matter.

4. Having regard to the rival submission of the parties

and considering the fact that the final form/closure report has

already been submitted in the matter showing it to be a case of

mistake of fact and the petitioner has already before the court

concerned with his protest petition, the petitioner is directed to

pursue his remedy before the learned trial court, which is

directed to pass an appropriate orders on his protest petition in

accordance with law considering the fact that the protest petition

is stated to be filed on 10.10.2023.

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.316 of 2024 dt.19-02-2026

5. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the

present writ petition stands disposed of.

(Arun Kumar Jha, J) V.K.Pandey/-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                NA
Uploading Date          20.02.2026
Transmission Date       20.02.2026
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter