Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Arjun Sharma vs The State Of Bihar
2026 Latest Caselaw 308 Patna

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 308 Patna
Judgement Date : 5 February, 2026

[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Patna High Court

Arjun Sharma vs The State Of Bihar on 5 February, 2026

Author: Mohit Kumar Shah
Bench: Mohit Kumar Shah, Alok Kumar Pandey
          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                   Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18314 of 2025
     ======================================================
     Arjun Sharma Son of Rameshwar Sharma, Resident of Mirzapur, 159,
     Opposite Dr. LK Kumar, Ward No. 20, Gondapur, P.S.- Nawada Town,
     District- Nawada.

                                                              ... ... Petitioner/s
                                       Versus
1.   The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Department of Registration
     and Excise, Bihar, Patna.
2.   The Excise Commissioner, Bihar, Patna.
3.   The District Magistrate, Nawada
4.   The Additional District Magistrate, Nawada.
5.   The Superintendent of Police, Nawada
6.   The Station House Officer, Excise Police Station, District-Nawada.

                                               ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr. Gopal Bohra, ADvocate
                                   Mr.Sudhir Kumar Singh, Advocate
                                   Mr. Saharsh Singh, Advocate
                                   Mr. Ambrish Kumar, Advocate
                                   Mr. Mukul Kumar, Advocate
     For the Respondent/s   :      Smt. Binita Singh, SC-28
                                   Mr. Ujjawal Bhushan, AC to SC-28
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH
             and
             HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY
     ORAL JUDGMENT
     (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH)
     Date : 05-02-2026

                    The present writ petition has been filed for directing

      the respondent-authorities to de-seal/release the house of the

      petitioner situated at Mauza-Mirzapur, Thana No.360, Khata

      No.40, Khersa No.467, Ward No.13, Police Station-Nawada

      Town, District-Nawada, which has been seized in connection

      with Nawada Excise P.S. Case No.544 of 2024, dated

      05.08.2024

, registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Patna High Court CWJC No.18314 of 2025 dt.05-02-2026

Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as "the

Act, 2016") against one Ranjeet Kumar on account of recovery

of 4.950 litres of foreign liquor from the said premises.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the Assistant

Sub-Inspector, Prohibition and Excise Police Station, Nawada

along with other police personnel and officials had conducted a

raid on the premises of the house in question on 05.08.2024 and

during the course thereof 4.950 litres of foreign liquor was

recovered and the person who was caught from the said

premise, upon enquiry disclosed his name as Ranjeet Kumar.

The said seizure of illicit foreign liquor has led to filing of the

aforesaid FIR, bearing Nawada Excise P.S. Case No.544 of

2024.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

that the petitioner is a bona fide owner of the house in question

as also mutation of the land/house in question is existing in

favour of the petitioner. It is further submitted that the accused

Ranjeet Kumar is the son of the petitioner, who has already been

granted bail by the learned Trial Court, however the fact

remains that the respondents have not found any material during

the course of investigation to connect the petitioner with the

alleged occurrence. It is also submitted by the learned counsel Patna High Court CWJC No.18314 of 2025 dt.05-02-2026

for the petitioner at the Bar that the petitioner is having a clean

antecedent. The learned counsel for the petitioner has referred to

a judgment dated 4.10.2024 passed by a co-ordinate Bench of

this Court in the case of Jaya Singh vs. The State of Bihar &

Ors. (CWJC No.14031 of 2024), wherein it has been held that

for recovery of a meager quantity of illicit liquor from the

premises in question, it would be appropriate to levy a penalty

of Rs.10,000/- and it would be unjust and improper in case the

owner of the premises is subjected to various proceedings under

Rule 12-B of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Rules, 2021 read

with Section 58, 92 and 93 of the Act, 2016. The learned

counsel for the petitioner has also referred to a judgment dated

14.08.2025 rendered by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the

case of Chhote Lal Manjhi vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.

(CWJC No.12846 of 2025), wherein it has been held that

considering the fact that small quantity of illicit liquor has been

recovered from a dwelling house, it would be appropriate to

levy a fine of Rs.10,000/- for the purposes of unsealing the

house in question.

4. Per contra, though the learned counsel for the

respondent-State has submitted that the petitioner has the

remedy of making an application for release of the premises in Patna High Court CWJC No.18314 of 2025 dt.05-02-2026

question under Rule 12-B of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise

(Amendment) Rules, 2022, however upon a query being put to

him by this Court as to whether there is any material to connect

the petitioner with the alleged occurrence, the answer is in the

negative.

5. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the

case and considering the fact that the petitioner is not named in

the aforesaid FIR bearing Nawada Excise P.S. Case No.544 of

2024 as also no material has been brought in the counter

affidavit filed in the present case to show the involvement of the

petitioner in the alleged occurrence much less his connivance in

the alleged occurrence, apart from the fact that meager quantity

of 4.950 litres of illicit foreign liquor has been recovered from

the premises in question, we deem it fit and proper to direct the

respondent-authorities to collect a fine of Rs.10,000/- and de-

seal as also release the premises in question in favour of the

petitioner upon being satisfied with the ownership of the

petitioner qua the premises in question.

6. It is needless to state that the petitioner shall

deposit the aforesaid sum of Rs.10,000/- before the appropriate

authority within a period of two weeks from today, whereupon

the premises in question shall be de-sealed and released in Patna High Court CWJC No.18314 of 2025 dt.05-02-2026

favour of the petitioner, upon the concerned authority being

satisfied with the ownership of the petitioner, within a period of

one week, thereafter.

7. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands

disposed off.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

(Alok Kumar Pandey, J) kanchan/-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                NA
Uploading Date          09.02.2026
Transmission Date       NA
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter