Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Deepak Kumar vs The State Of Bihar
2025 Latest Caselaw 3775 Patna

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3775 Patna
Judgement Date : 12 September, 2025

Patna High Court

Deepak Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 12 September, 2025

Author: Alok Kumar Sinha
Bench: Alok Kumar Sinha
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                 Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7572 of 2025
     ======================================================
     Deepak Kumar son of Sado Rajwanshi, Resident of Village Punthar, P.S.

     Narhat, District Nawada


                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                            Versus

1.   The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Revenue and
     Land Reforms Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2.   The Additional Chief Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Govt. of Bihar,
     Patna.
3.   The District Magistrate Cum-Collector Nawada.
4.   The District Development Commissioner, Nawada
5.   The Panchayati Raj Officer, Nawada.
6.   The Sub-Divisional Officer, Rajauli, Nawada.
7.   The Block Development Officer, Narhat, Nawada,
8.   The Circle Officer, Narhat, Nawada.
9.   The Mukhia Punthar Gram Panchayat, Narhat, Nawada.
10. The Panchayat Secretary, Punthar Gram Panchayat, Narhat, Nawada.

                                               ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s      :       Mr.Amar Nath Singh, Advocate
     For the Respondent/s      :       Mr. P.K. Shahi, Advocate General
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
             and
             HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA
     ORAL JUDGMENT

(Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)

Date : 12-09-2025 In the instant writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for

the following relief(s):-

"That in the larger public Interest this is an application for issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondents to cancel the decision of the Panchayati Raj Department whereby construction of Panchayat Sarkar Bhawan on the land bearing khata Patna High Court CWJC No.7572 of 2025 dt.12-09-2025

no. 187Plot No. 1025 area 0.34 decimal situated at Mauza Punthar under the Gram Panchayat Punthar, Narhat Nawada which is the only cremation Ground of village Punthar where about 100 family of Mahadali/schedule Caste (Rajwar, Ravidas, Manjhi, Paswan resides) and further direct the Respondent concern to reallocate the Panchayat Sarkar Bhawan at another suitable land.

And further Respondents be restrained from constructing Panchayat Sarkar Bhawan or any construction over the said land or from changing nature of land.

And for any other relief for which the petitioner is entitled in the facts and circumstances of the case."

2. It is well settled that such matters fall within the

policy/making domain of the Executive, and unless the policy is

shown to be arbitrary, discriminatory or unconstitutional, this

Court cannot substitute its wisdom for that of the Government.

3. Hon'ble Supreme Court in its several decisions

held that Court should not interfere in policy matters except on

certain limited grounds, namely:

(a) State of Himachal Pradesh and Others vs. Himachal Pradesh Nizi Vyavsayik Prishikshan Kendra Sangh, reported in (2011) 6 SCC 597 in which it is held that Courts are not intended to and should not substitute their views in the views of the Executive in policy matters;

(b) BALCO Employees' Union (Regd.) vs. Union of India and Others, reported in (2002) 2 SCC 333 in which it is held that unless a policy decision is arbitrary, mala Patna High Court CWJC No.7572 of 2025 dt.12-09-2025

fide or contrary to statutory provisions, Courts cannot interfere;

(c) Narmada Bachao Andolan vs. Union of India and Others, reported in (2000) 10 SCC 664 in which it is held that Courts should not examine the wisdom or correctness of policy choices.

4. The aforementioned principles are evident that the

decision whether or not to establish Panchayat Bhawan is a

matter of Governmental policy based on various socio-

economic factors. The Court cannot issue a mandamus

compelling the State to deviate from its policy framework.

5. In the light of aforementioned discussions, writ

petition is dismissed, with liberty to the petitioner to make a

detailed representation to the competent authority, who will

consider the same in accordance with law and Government

policy.

(P. B. Bajanthri, ACJ)

(Alok Kumar Sinha, J)

ranjan/-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                NA
Uploading Date          17.09.2025
Transmission Date       NA
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter