Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dharmendra Kumar Paswan vs The State Of Bihar
2025 Latest Caselaw 4217 Patna

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4217 Patna
Judgement Date : 17 October, 2025

Patna High Court

Dharmendra Kumar Paswan vs The State Of Bihar on 17 October, 2025

         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                   Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17142 of 2019
     ======================================================
     Dharmendra Kumar Paswan S/o Prabhu Paswan Resident of Ward No.2,
     Belaith, Sugauli, P.S. Sugauli, Dist.E.Champaran.
                                                              ... ... Petitioner/s
                                          Versus
1.    The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary, Food and Consumer
      Protection Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2.   The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, East Champaran,Motihari
3.   The District Supply Officer, East Champaran,Motihari
4.   The Sub-Divisional Offidcer,Sadar,Motihari, Dist.E.Champaran
5.   The Block Supply Officer,Sugauli, Dist.E.Champaran
                                               ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr.Dhurendra Kumar, Adv.
     For the Respondent/s   :      Mr.Arvind Ujjwal (SC4)
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY

     ORAL JUDGMENT

Date : 17-10-2025

1. The Writ petition is filed for the following

reliefs:-

"For issuance of an appropriate writ(s), order(s) or directions(s), directing the Respondent concerned to issue/grant PDS license in favour of the petitioner in as much as License of their PDS shops were reserved for Scheduled Castes, but ignoring this fact, the claim of the petitioner has been rejected on the ground that the petitioner does not possess qualification of reservation while the petitioner was single candidate from Schedule Caste category in Nagar Panchayat, Sugauli. Patna High Court CWJC No.17142 of 2019 dt.17-10-2025

2. At this juncture, the Learned counsel for

the respondents contended that Section 32(iii) of the

Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control)

Order, 2016 provides for the provision of appeal and

Section 32(vi) of the Bihar Targeted Public

Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016 provides

for the provision of revision. Section 32(iii) 32(v) and

32(vi) read as follows:

"32 (iii). Any person aggrieved by an order of the licensing authority denying the issue or renewal of the license to the fair price shop owner or cancellation of the license may appeal to the District Officer within thirty days of the date of receipt of the order and the District Magistrate shall, as far as practicable, dispose the appeal within a period of sixty days."

32. (v) Till the disposal of appeal pending, the Appellate Authority may direct that the order under appeal shall not take effect for such period as the authority may consider necessary for giving a reasonable opportunity to the other party under sub-clause (4) or until the appeal is disposed of, whichever is earlier.

Patna High Court CWJC No.17142 of 2019 dt.17-10-2025

(vi) Due to non disposal of the appeal within sixty days by the District Officer or against the order passed in the appeal, a revision may be filed before the Divisional Commissioner. The revision shall be disposed of within two months.

3. Admittedly, from the reliefs prayed for in

the Writ petition, it is evident that the petitioner has

an alternative remedy under the provisions of Bihar

Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order,

2016.

4. The remedy available under the Act is to

prefer an appeal before the District Magistrate. As

the District Magistrate is the head of the Selection

Committee, he cannot review his orders in an

appeal. Therefore, the petitioner is directed to file a

complaint/application before the Divisional

Commissioner.

5. The Learned counsel for the petitioner

contended that he intends to file a

complaint/application before the concerned

authority, but the limitation period for filing the

same has lapsed. He prayed for a direction to the Patna High Court CWJC No.17142 of 2019 dt.17-10-2025

concerned authority to entertain the same in

accordance with Section 5 of the Limitation Act.

6. Taking into consideration that the

petitioner has an alternative remedy for filing

complaint/application, the Writ petition is disposed

of with a direction to the petitioner to file

complaint/application within two months from the

date of receipt of this order before the concerned

authority. The delay in filing the complaint/

application shall be condoned by the authority

concerned, and the authority shall dispose of the

same within three months from the date of filing of

the same.

7. With the above said observation, the Writ

petition is disposed of.

8. Interlocutory Application(s), if any, shall

stand disposed of.

(G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J) AMANDEEP/-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                N/A
Uploading Date          17.10.2025
Transmission Date
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter