Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Jitendra Paswan vs The State Of Bihar
2025 Latest Caselaw 4178 Patna

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4178 Patna
Judgement Date : 16 October, 2025

Patna High Court

Jitendra Paswan vs The State Of Bihar on 16 October, 2025

         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                    Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16914 of 2019
     ======================================================
     Jitendra Paswan S/o Kali Charan Paswan Resident of Village- Ward No.01
     Purnahi P.S.- Warisnagar Distt Samastipur.

                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                        Versus
1.   The State of Bihar through the Collector Samastipur.
2.   The Collector, Samastipur.
3.   The Distt. Supply Officer, Samastipur.
4.   The Sub Divisional Officer, Samastipur.
5.   Mukesh Kumar Son of Ramashray Prasad Singh Resident of Village- Ward
     No.-01, Purnahi P.S.- Warisnagar, Distt- Samastipur.

                                               ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s   :        Mr.Mukesh Kumar No1
     For the Respondent/s   :        Mr.Arvind Ujjawal ( SC-4 )
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY

                                  ORAL JUDGMENT

Date : 16-10-2025

1. The writ petition is filed for the following

reliefs:-

"(i)For issuance of writ in nature of certiorari for quashing of memo no.-

213 dated 18.02.2019 whereby Licences of PDS Fair price shop of Purnahi Panchayat has been allotted to the Respondent No.-5.

(ii) For also issuance of writ in nature of Mandamus directing to the respondents concern to allot the Licences of PDS Fair Price shop of Patna High Court CWJC No.16914 of 2019 dt.16-10-2025

Purnahi Panchayat to the petitioner as the petitioner got 1st in the provisional list.

(iii) For issuance of any other appropriate writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions to command the respondents."

2. At this juncture, the Learned counsel for

the respondents contended that Section 32(iii) of the

Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control)

Order, 2016 provides for the provision of appeal and

Section 32(vi) of the Bihar Targeted Public

Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016 provides

for the provision of revision.

Section 32(iii) 32(v) and 32(vi) read as

follows:

32 (iii). Any person aggrieved by an order of the licensing authority denying the issue or renewal of the license to the fair price shop owner or cancellation of the license may appeal to the District Officer within thirty days of the date of receipt of the order and the District Patna High Court CWJC No.16914 of 2019 dt.16-10-2025

Magistrate shall, as far as practicable, dispose the appeal within a period of sixty days.

32. (v) Till the disposal of appeal pending, the Appellate Authority may direct that the order under appeal shall not take effect for such period as the authority may consider necessary for giving a reasonable opportunity to the other party under sub-clause (4) or until the appeal is disposed of, whichever is earlier.

(vi) Due to non disposal of the appeal within sixty days by the District Officer or against the order passed in the appeal, a revision may be filed before the Divisional Commissioner. The revision shall be disposed of within two months.

3. Admittedly, from the reliefs prayed for in

the writ petition, it is evident that the petitioner has

an alternative remedy under the provisions of Bihar

Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order,

2016.

Patna High Court CWJC No.16914 of 2019 dt.16-10-2025

4. The remedy available under the Act is to

prefer an appeal before the District Magistrate. As

the District Magistrate is the head of the Selection

Committee he cannot review his orders in an appeal.

Therefore, the petitioner is directed to file a

complaint/application before the Divisional

Commissioner.

5. The Learned counsel for the petitioner

contended that he intends to file a

complaint/application before the concerned

authority, but the limitation period for filing the same

has lapsed. He prayed for a direction to the

concerned authority to entertain the same in

accordance with Section 5 of the Limitation Act.

6. Taking into consideration that the

petitioner has an alternative remedy for filing

complaint/application, the writ petition is disposed of

with a direction to the petitioner to file

complaint/application within one month from the

date of receipt of this order before the concerned

authority. The delay in filing the

complaint/application shall be condoned by the Patna High Court CWJC No.16914 of 2019 dt.16-10-2025

authority concerned, and the authority shall dispose

of the same within three months from the date of

filing of the same.

7. With the above said observations, the Writ

petition shall stand disposed of.

8. Interlocutory Application(s), if any, shall

stand disposed of.

(G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J)

vinita/-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                NA
Uploading Date          16.10.2025
Transmission Date
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter