Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mahesh Yadav @ Mahesh Prasad Yadav vs The State Of Bihar
2025 Latest Caselaw 294 Patna

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 294 Patna
Judgement Date : 14 May, 2025

Patna High Court

Mahesh Yadav @ Mahesh Prasad Yadav vs The State Of Bihar on 14 May, 2025

Author: Chandra Shekhar Jha
Bench: Chandra Shekhar Jha
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42679 of 2024
         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-178 Year-2021 Thana- SABAUR District- Bhagalpur
     ======================================================
1.    Mahesh Yadav @ Mahesh Prasad Yadav S/O Chutar Yadav R/O Mohalla-
      Daudwat, P.S- Habibpur, Distt.- Bhagalpur.
2.   Partima Devi W/O Mahesh Yadav @ Mahesh Prasad Yadav R/O Mohalla-
     Daudwat, P.S- Habibpur, Distt.- Bhagalpur.
                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s
                                       Versus
1.   The State of Bihar.
2.    Nitu Kumari D/o Dhuri Yadav R/O Village- Lailakh, P.S- Sabour, Distt.-
      Bhagalpur.
                                                      ... ... Opposite Party/s
     ======================================================
                                    with
                 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 54781 of 2024
         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-178 Year-2021 Thana- SABAUR District- Bhagalpur
     ======================================================
     Vimal Kumar @ Vimal Yadav @ Aman Yadav Son of Mahesh Yadav @
     Mahesh Prasad Yadav R/o Village- Daudwat, P.S.- Habibpur, Dist-
     Bhagalpur.                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                Versus
1.    The State of Bihar.
2.    Nitu Kumari Daughter of Dhuri Yadav, R/o Village- Lailakh, P.S.- Sabour,
      Dist- Bhagalpur.
                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 42679 of 2024)
     For the Petitioner/s     : Dr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate
     For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Dinesh Singh, APP
     (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 54781 of 2024)
     For the Petitioner/s     : Mr.Dr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate
     For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Satyendra Prasad, APP
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
     ORAL JUDGMENT

Date : 14-05-2025

Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

parties.

2. The present application has been preferred by the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42679 of 2024 dt.14-05-2025

petitioners for quashing the order dated 11.09.2023 passed

by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur, in

connection with Sabour P.S. Case No. 178 of 2021 where

learned Magistrate took cognizance against petitioners for the

offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 498A, 504,

506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section ¾ of the Dowry

Prohibition Act.

3. The case of the prosecution in brief is that

informant/O.P. No. 2, namely Nitu Kumari solemnized love

marriage with petitioner Vimal Kumar @ Vimal yadav @ Aman

Yadav. It is alleged further that after two months of marriage

her husband, father-in-law, Mahesh Prasad Yadav, mother-in-

law, Pritama Devi, started torturing her and raised demand of

dowry for Rs. 2 lacs, motor cycle and one Bigha of land and,

thereafter, threatened that if aforesaid demands were not

fulfilled will solemnized second marriage of their son. It is also

stated that her father had already given jewelry of Rs.

70,000/- and now he is not in position to give any dowry. She

further alleged that she was ousted from her matrimonial

house and, thereafter anyhow she reached her father's house. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42679 of 2024 dt.14-05-2025

She further alleged that on 12.7.2021 at 4.00 P.M. her

husband called her and threatened to kill her in case of non-

fulfillment of demand of dowry

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners without

arguing available merits, submitted that the matter

compromised between the parties against sum of Rs. 4.5 lacs,

which was paid to opposite party no. 2. It is submitted that

payment was made against gifts, which was given by parents

of opposite party no. 2, before solemnization of marriage.

5. The factum of compromise also approved by

learned counsel Ms. Kshem Sharma, appearing for the

opposite party no. 2. She also affirmed that opposite party no.

2 never solemnized marriage with son of petitioners, namely

Vimal Yadav.

6. In view of compromise as aforesaid,

continuation of this proceedings before the learned trial court

would amount to abuse of process of court of law. Accordingly,

order of cognizance dated 11.09.2023 passed by the learned

Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur, against petitioners and

other co-accused persons in connection with Sabour P.S. Case Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42679 of 2024 dt.14-05-2025

No. 178 of 2021, is hereby set aside and quashed to secure

ends of justice with all its consequential proceedings.

7. Accordingly, present quashing petition stands

allowed.

8. Let a copy of this judgment be sent to the learned

trial court/concerned court forthwith.

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J) veena/-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                NA
Uploading Date          14.05.2025
Transmission Date       14.05.2025
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter