Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Md. Imraj Rashid vs The State Of Bihar And Ors
2025 Latest Caselaw 290 Patna

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 290 Patna
Judgement Date : 14 May, 2025

Patna High Court

Md. Imraj Rashid vs The State Of Bihar And Ors on 14 May, 2025

         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                   Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12719 of 2017
     ======================================================
     Md. Imraj Rashid Son of Late Harun Rashid, Resident of Village- Marar
     Dakshin, P.O.- Marar, P.S.- Morkahi, District- Khagaria.

                                                            ... ... Petitioner/s
                                       Versus
1.   The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Food and Consumer
     Protection Department, Old Secretariat, Patna.
2.   The Additional Secretary, Food and Consumer Protection Department, Old
     Secretariat, Patna.
3.   The Collector, Khagaria, District- Khagaria.
4.   The Sub- Divisional Officer, Khagaria, District- Khagaria.

                                               ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr.Rajeev Kumar Labh, Advocate
     For the Respondent/s   :      Mr.Arvind Ujjwal-Sc4
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY
     ORAL JUDGMENT

Date : 14-05-2025

1. Initially the Writ petition was filed with a

prayer to quash the circular issued by the State of

Bihar, Food and Consumer Protection Department of

the Additional Secretary, vide Memo No. Pra 07-

Misc.-16/2015-1222 dated 08.03.2017, whereby it

was stated to all the regional Commissioner/all the

District Magistrates to make roaster under provision Patna High Court CWJC No.12719 of 2017 dt.14-05-2025

of Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control)

Order, 2016 and the provision of General

Administration Department in which 35% reservation

for women has been logically and practically allowed

under the circular No. 2342 dated 15.02.2016 and to

start action for issuance of new PDS license after

publishing advertisement in leading newspapers and

informed the same as soon as possible as well as

quashing the vacancy published by the Collector,

Khagaria in daily newspaper dated 12.05.2017 for

the same as contained in Annexure-1 and

accordingly direct the respondents not to issue fresh

PDS license within the Marar Dakshni Panchayat in

the block and district of Khagaria till final order of

this Court and further to direct the licensing

authority to dispose of the application filed by the

petitioner in the year 2015.

Patna High Court CWJC No.12719 of 2017 dt.14-05-2025

2. During the course of argument, the

Learned counsel for the petitioner reported that he is

not pressing for the entire relief and only prays for

the relief which is as follows:-

Further to direct the licensing

authority to dispose of the application

filed by the petitioner in the year 2015.

3. The Learned counsel for the petitioner has

also made an endorsement that he is not pressing

the entire prayer. The limited aspect which is to be

decided by this Court is that whether the application

of the petitioner, filed in the year 2015 is still

pending with the respondent authorities or not ?

4. At this juncture, the Learned counsel for

the respondent contended that the direction may be

given to the licensing authority, to dispose of the

application if at all it is pending. Further it is

contended by the Learned counsel for the Patna High Court CWJC No.12719 of 2017 dt.14-05-2025

respondents that the petitioner shall make a fresh

representation before the authority, for which a

reasonable order can be passed by the respondents.

5. In view of the submissions, this Court

directs the petitioner to make a fresh representation

before the concerned authority within a period of

one month from the date of receipt of this order,

along with the order copy and in turn, the

respondents shall pass a reasonable order within two

months from the date of filing of the representation.

6. With the aforesaid observation, the Writ

petition is disposed of.

7. Interlocutory Application(s), if any, shall

also disposed of.

(G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J) amitkr/-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                N/A
Uploading Date          15.05.2025
Transmission Date       N/A
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter