Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sadik Reja @ Sadique Reza vs The State Of Bihar
2025 Latest Caselaw 273 Patna

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 273 Patna
Judgement Date : 14 May, 2025

Patna High Court

Sadik Reja @ Sadique Reza vs The State Of Bihar on 14 May, 2025

Author: P. B. Bajanthri
Bench: P. B. Bajanthri
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18044 of 2024
     ======================================================

1.   Sadik Reja @ Sadique Reza son of Sahabuddin Kayam @ Shahabuddin,
     resident of Mohalla-Suleman Ganj, Madar Darwaza, P.O. and P.S.-Sasaram
     (T), District-Rohtas.
2.   Rajesh Kumar Sahu Son of Late Hari narayan Sahu Resident of Mohalla -
     Suleman Ganj (Chowk Bazar), P.O. and P.S. - Sasaram (T), District- Rohtas.

                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                       Versus


1.   The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Prohibition and Excise
     Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2.   The Excise Secretary, Prohibition and Excise Department, Excise and
     Registration, Bihar, Patna.
3.   The Excise Commissioner, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
4.   The Collector cum District Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram.
5.   The Superintendent of Police, Rohtas at Sasaram.
6.   The Inspector of Excise, Rohtas at Sasaram.
7.   The Officer in Charge, Sasaram (Town) Police Station, Rohtas at Sasaram.
8.   Pradeep Kumar, son of Late Hari Narayan Sahu, resident of Mohalla-
     Suleman Ganj (Chowk Bazar), P.O. and P.S.-Sasaram (T), District-Rohtas.
9.   Rajan Kumar son of Pradeep Kumar, resident of Mohalla-Suleman Ganj
     (Chowk Bazar), P.O. and P.S.-Sasaram (T), District-Rohtas.

                                                             ... ... Respondent/s

     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s   :     Mr.Ashwani Kumar Tiwary
     For the Respondent/s   :     Mr.Standing Counsel (09)

     ======================================================

     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI
                         And
              HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH
                   ORAL JUDGMENT
        (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH)

     Date : 14-05-2025

                  In the instant petition, the petitioner has prayed
 Patna High Court CWJC No.18044 of 2024 dt.14-05-2025
                                           2/9




         for the following reliefs(s):-

                            "I For issuance of a writ in the nature of
                     certiorari for quashing the order dated
                     21.08.2023

passed by the learned Excise Secretary, Bihar, Patna in Excise Revision Case No. 31/2023 whereby and where under the appellate order dated 12.06.2023 passed by the learned Excise Commissioner, Bihar, Patna in Excise Appeal Case No. 28/2023 has been affirmed illegally and arbitrary.

П. For issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order dated 12.06.2023 passed by the learned Excise Commissioner, Bihar, Patna in Excise Appeal Case No. 28/2023 by which order dated 13.12.2022 passed by the learned Collector- Cum- District Magistrate, Rohtas (Sasaram) in Excise Confiscation Case No. 59/2019 has been affirmed illegally and further quashing/set aside the order dated 13.12.2022 passed by the learned Collector- Cum-

District Magistrate. Rohtas (Sasaram) in Excise Confiscation Case No. 59/2019 whereby and whereunder the learned Collector confiscated the land bearing Khata

decimal situated in Thana No. 126, Ward (old) 9, Ward New 28 under Muhalla Chauk Bazar Patna High Court CWJC No.18044 of 2024 dt.14-05-2025

illegally and arbitrary without considering the material available on the record of the case. III. For issuance of direction upon the respondents to release the land in question bearing Khata No. M.S. 152, Plot No. M.S. 382/383 area 6 decimal in favour of petitioner. IV. For issuance of any other order / orders / relief / reliefs for which the petitioner is found to be entitled in the facts and circumstances of the case.

2. As per the written report, the prosecution case

in brief is that on 06.05.2018, the informant got an

information that petitioner-Rajesh Kumar and his wife

used to sell the liquor and they are selling illicit liquor near

a well situated in front of their house. On getting such

information, the police reached near the identified place

and found that some people are drinking liquor by sitting

on the well situated in front of house of petitioner-Rajesh

Kumar. On seeing the police force, they began to flee

away but with the help of police officials, five persons

were apprehended who disclosed that illicit liquor was

being sold by Rajesh Kumar and his wife. Thereafter, the

house of Rajesh Kumar was searched and during search, Patna High Court CWJC No.18044 of 2024 dt.14-05-2025

total 15.980 illicit liquor was recovered from abandoned

constructed wall of room situated beside the stairs of the

first floor of the house and accordingly, seizure list was

prepared. On the basis of the aforesaid facts, Sasaram

Town P.S. Case No. 717 of 2018 dated 06.05.2018 was

instituted under Sections 30 (a), 35(b), 37(a)(b), 38(2) of

the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016.

3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the

petitioner-Sadik Reja that he got the sale-deed executed of

2.980 decimals of land to the petitioner Rajesh Kumar

Sahu vide Sale Deed No. 4241 dated 10.04.2019 and after

purchase of the said land, he came to know about the order

of confiscation dated 20.12.2021 passed by the Collector-

Cum-District Magistrate, Rohtas (Sasaram) in Excise

Confiscation Case No. 59 of 2019. Being aggrieved with

the said order, the petitioner-Sadik Reja filed Excise

Appeal Case No. 401 of 2022 before the Excise

Commissioner, Bihar, Patna on the ground that no notice

was issued to him as well as the previous owner of the

land and the Collector had passed the confiscation order

ex-parte. After considering the prayer of the petitioner- Patna High Court CWJC No.18044 of 2024 dt.14-05-2025

Sadik Reja, the Excise Commissioner vide order dated

05.07.2022 has remanded back the matter before the

Collector, Rohtas, Sasaram to hear the matter afresh by

giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The Excise

(Confiscation) Case No. 59 of 2019 was restored and

notice was issued to the petitioner to file his reply.

However, after hearing the parties, vide order dated

13.12.2022, the Collector-Cum- District Magistrate,

Rohtas (Sasaram) imposed a fine of Rs. 20,000,00/-

(Twenty Lakh) for release of the land/house of the

petitioner. The petitioner further submitted that being

aggrieved by the order of the District Magistrate, Rohtas at

Sasaram, the petitioner filed Excise Appeal No. 28 of 2023

before the Excise Commissioner, Bihar, Patna but after

hearing the parties, the Excise Commissioner, vide order

dated 12.06.2023 had affirmed the confiscation order and

directed that if the fine imposed is not being paid for

release of the land within 15 days from the date of

receiving the order, the District Magistrate would take

action for auction of the land. The petitioner being

aggrieved with the order dated 12.06.2023 passed by the Patna High Court CWJC No.18044 of 2024 dt.14-05-2025

Excise Commissioner, Bihar Patna in Excise Appeal No.

28 of 2023, had filed Excise Revision Case No. 31 of 2023

before the learned Excise Secretary, Bihar, Patna but his

revision petition was also dismissed vide order dated

21.08.2023 on the ground that no new and additional facts

were mentioned in the revision petition.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner further

submits that learned Collector-Cum- District Magistrate,

Rohtas (Sasaram), as well as revisional and appellate

authority while passing the impugned order have failed to

consider the fact that the liquor was recovered from

abandoned constructed wall of room situated beside the

stairs of the first floor of the house which was situated on

some portion of the land, but the confiscation proceeding

was initiated on the whole land which is highly illegal,

arbitrary and bad in the eye of law and the same is liable to

be quashed. It is also submitted that the respondent

authorities, while passing the order did not appreciate Rule

12A (2) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Rules, 2021, in

which the quantum of recovered liquor is one of the key

factors which has to be considered while imposing the Patna High Court CWJC No.18044 of 2024 dt.14-05-2025

penalty over the seized vehicle under the Bihar Excise &

Prohibition Amendment Act, 2018.

5. Learned counsel for the respondents submits

that recovery of illicit liquor was made from the purchased

house of the petitioner-Sadik Reja. The petitioner has

alternative remedy to get the house released after making

payment of penalty in terms of Rule 12(A) of the Bihar

Prohibition & Excise Rules, 2021.

6. From perusal of the record, it has transpired

that alleged recovery of 15.980 litres of illicit country

made liquor has been made from abandoned constructed

wall of room situated beside the stairs of the first floor of

the house. The petitioner-Sadik Reja had purchased the

said property from Rajesh Kumar Sahu and he claims that

he was totally unaware about any confiscation proceeding

pending against the purchased land of the petitioner.

7. In that view of the matter, this Court finds that

a penalty of Rs. 5,000,00/-(Five Lakhs) is appropriate in

light of the facts and circumstances of the case, for which

petitioner has no objection.

8. Accordingly, the order dated 13.12.2022 passed Patna High Court CWJC No.18044 of 2024 dt.14-05-2025

by the Collector-Cum- District Magistrate, Rohtas

(Sasaram) vide Excise (Confiscation) Case No. 59 of 2019

is modified to the above extent.

9. We are conscious of the fact that alleged

recovery is of meager quantity and the aforesaid order has

been passed while invoking extra ordinary jurisdiction

under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the

reasons that unnecessarily petitioner shall not be subjected

to various proceedings like Rule of 12A of the Bihar

Prohibition and Excise Rules, 2021 read Sections 58, 92

and 93 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, for

an issue relating to seizure of 15.980 litres of illicit liquor

and the aforesaid decision is warranted to prevent

multiplicity of proceeding under Excise Act and Rules, in

the interest of justice.

10. Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioner

is directed to remit a penalty of Rs. 5,000,00/-(Five Lakhs)

and the concerned authority is hereby directed to collect

fine of Rs. 5,000,00/-(Five Lakhs) and release the land of

the petitioner, which was seized, within a period of one

week from the date of receipt of this order.

Patna High Court CWJC No.18044 of 2024 dt.14-05-2025

11. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed

of.

( S. B. Pd. Singh, J)

(P. B. Bajanthri, J)

Shageer/-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                N/A
Uploading Date          15/05/2025
Transmission Date       N/A
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter