Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 142 Patna
Judgement Date : 7 May, 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3839 of 2025
======================================================
1. M/s Rathod Solutions having its registered office at Srinagar Colony, Road
No.- 8, Ashiyana Nagar, Patna- 800025, represented through its Proprietor
namely Manjay Kumar, (male), aged about 43 years, Son of Shiv Prasad
Singh, resident of 203/B, Samridhi Elegance, Choubey Bagan, Anantpur,
Doranda, P.O.- Doranda, P.S.- Chutiya, District- Ranchi, State- Jharkhand,
presently residing at Srinagar Colony, Road No.- 8, Ashiyana Nagar, Patna-
800025.
2. Manjay Kumar, Son of Shiv Prasad Singh Proprietor of M/s Rathod
Solutions, resident of 203/B, Samridhi Elegance, Choubey Bagan, Anantpur,
Doranda, P.O.- Doranda, P.S.- Chutiya, District- Ranchi, State- Jharkhand,
presently residing at Srinagar Colony, Road No.- 8, Ashiyana Nagar, Patna-
800025.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Home Department,
Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Principal Secretary, Home Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Commissioner, Patna Division, Patna.
4. The Regional Development Officer-cum-Nodal Officer, Patna Division,
Patna.
5. The Secretary to the Commissioner, Patna Division, Patna.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashish Giri, Sr. Advocate
Mr. Sumit Kumar Jha, Advocate
For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vikash Kumar, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY
ORAL JUDGMENT
(Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)
Date : 07-05-2025
Heard Mr. Ashish Giri, the learned Senior
Advocate for the petitioners and Mr. Vikas Kumar, the
learned Advocate for the State.
Patna High Court CWJC No.3839 of 2025 dt.07-05-2025
2. Mr. Giri, while assailing the order of
blacklisting of the petitioner-Firm has submitted that
apart from the merits of the case, which makes the order
of blacklisting untenable, the order has been passed for
an indefinite period, which is in teeth of the judgment of
the Supreme Court in Kulja Industries Ltd. vs Chief
General Manager, Western Telecom Project,
Bharat Sanchar Nigal Ltd. & Ors. (2014) 14 SCC
731.
3. On perusal of the order impugned, we find
that the blacklisting is for an indefinite period which is not
permissible.
4. We have not addressed ourselves to the
merits of the case necessitating an order of blacklisting of
the petitioner-Firm.
5. We only deem it appropriate to set aside the
order with respect to blacklisting of the petitioners for an
indefinite period and remand it to the authority
concerned, who shall pass a fresh order in accordance Patna High Court CWJC No.3839 of 2025 dt.07-05-2025
with law giving reasons within a period of 60 days from
the date of receipt/ communication of a copy of this
order.
6. It will be open for the petitioner to raise all
his pleas before the authority who shall take that into
account before passing any order.
7. The writ petition stands disposed of
accordingly.
(Ashutosh Kumar, ACJ)
(Partha Sarthy, J)
Bibhash/Rajesh
AFR/NAFR NAFR
CAV DATE NA
Uploading Date 9.5.2025
Transmission Date NA
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!