Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ujjawal Kumar vs The Food And Consumer Protection ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 138 Patna

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 138 Patna
Judgement Date : 7 May, 2025

Patna High Court

Ujjawal Kumar vs The Food And Consumer Protection ... on 7 May, 2025

         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                 Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10169 of 2017
     ======================================================
     Ujjawal Kumar Son of Ram Suresh Prasad Singh Proprietor of M/s Kishan
     Mini Rice Mill, resident of Village- Vishunpura, P.S. Sherghati, District-
     Gaya.

                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                        Versus

1.   The Food And Consumer Protection Department Through Its Principal
     Secretary
2.   The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate, District- Gaya.
3.   The Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. through its
     Managing Director, Bihar at Pa
4.   The Chief of Finance, Head Quarter, The Bihar State Food and Civil
     Supplies Corporation Ltd. Patna.
5.   The District Manager, The Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation
     Ltd. District- Gaya.

                                               ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr. Sumeet Kumar Singh, Adv.
     For the Respondent/s   :      Mr. Sanjay Kr.Giri-GP-9
                                   Mr. Shailendra Kr. Singh, Adv.
                                   Mr. Utkarsh Utpal, Adv.
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY
                                ORAL JUDGMENT

Date : 07-05-2025

1. The Writ petition is filed for following

reliefs:-

I. That the present writ application has been filed for the issuance of the appropriate writ order(s) or direction(s) in the nature of Mandamus for commanding the respondent authorities to consider Patna High Court CWJC No.10169 of 2017 dt.07-05-2025

the genuine bill of the petitioner with respect to the transportation, milling and handling charges for the procurement year 2013-14 and 2014-15 entered between the B.S.F.C, Gaya and the petitioner of Rs.36,93,590.41 (Thirty Six Lakhs Ninety Three Thousand Five Hundred and Ninety Rupees Forty One Paise)with 12% interest and also milling charge for the procurement year 2011-12 of Rs.58,787 (Fifty Eight Thousand Seven Hundred and Eighty Seven Rupees) with 12% interest;

II. That the present writ application has been filed for the issuance of the appropriate writ order(s) or direction(s) in the nature of Mandamus for a direction to the M.D., B.S.F.C, Patna and the Chief of Finance, B.S.F.C to consider the representation given by the petitioner for the transportation, milling and handling charge for the procurement year 2013-14 and 2014-15 entered between the B.S.F.C, Gaya and the petitioner of Patna High Court CWJC No.10169 of 2017 dt.07-05-2025

Rs.36,93,590.41 with 12% interest and also milling charge for the procurement year 2011-12 of Rs. 58,787 with 12% interest from the date of dues.

III. And for the issuance of any other relief or relief(s) for which the petitioner is entitled to in the facts and circumstances of the present case.

3. During the course of arguments, the

Learned counsel for the petitioner reported that he

has made a representation dated 08.07.2017

(Annexure-6), but the same was not considered by

the respondent authorities and therefore, the Writ

petition is filed.

4. On the other hand, the Learned counsel

for the respondents submitted that there is no

endorsement on the said representation indicating

that it was received by the respondent authorities. It

is also contended by the Learned counsel for the

respondent that a fresh representation may be filed

by the petitioner to enable the respondents to pass

appropriate orders basing on the said representation.

Patna High Court CWJC No.10169 of 2017 dt.07-05-2025

5. Taking into consideration, the Writ petition

dated 08.07.2017 is not found to be within the

domain of the respondent, therefore, this Court

directs the respondent to file a fresh representation

within one month from the date of receipt of a copy

of this order. In turn, the respondent authority shall

also pass appropriate orders considering the merits

of the case within two months from the date of

receipt of this order.

6. With the aforesaid observations, the Writ

petition is disposed of.

(G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J) Manish/-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                N/A
Uploading Date          08.05.2025
Transmission Date       08.05.2025
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter