Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The General Insurance Council vs The State Of Bihar
2025 Latest Caselaw 1908 Patna

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1908 Patna
Judgement Date : 21 February, 2025

Patna High Court

The General Insurance Council vs The State Of Bihar on 21 February, 2025

Author: Ashutosh Kumar
Bench: Partha Sarthy, Ashutosh Kumar
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                    Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.480 of 2024
     ======================================================
     The General Insurance Council 5th Floor, National Insurance Building, 14,
     Jamshedji Tata Road, Church Gate, Mumbai, Maharashtra- 400020 through
     INDERJEET SINGH, aged about 60 years, Male, Son of Harbans Singh,
     Authorized Signatory/ Duly Constituted Attorney, the General Insurance
     Council, 5th Floor, National Insurance Building 14, Jamshedji Tata Road,
     Church Gate, Mumbai, Maharashtra- 400020
                                                              ... ... Petitioner/s

                                        Versus

1.   The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna
2.   The Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna
3.   The Department of Transport through the Principal Secretary, Government
     of Bihar, Patna
4.    The Secretary, Department of Transport, Government of Bihar, Patna
                                                             ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
                                        with

                    Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 627 of 2024
     ======================================================
     Arun Kumar Singh S/o Sri Singeshwar Singh Resident of -Purab Bazar, Ward
     No. 19, P.O. and P.S.-Saharsa, District-Saharsa, Bihar-852201.

                                                               ... ... Petitioner/s
                                       Versus
1.   The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.   The Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3.   The Department of Transport throgh the Principal Secretary, Government of
     Bihar, Patna.
4.   The Secrerary, Department of Transport, Government of Bihar, Patna.
5.   The General Insurance Council, 5th Floor, National Insurance Building,14,
     Jamshedji Tata Road, Church Gate, Mumbai, Maharashtra-400020.
6.   The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. through the Chief Regional Manager,
     BSFC Building, Patna-1
7.   The National Insurance Co. Ltd. through the Chief Regional Manager, Sone
     Bhawan, Patna-1
8.   The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. through the Chief Regional Manager,
     Pirmuhani, Patna-1.
9.   The United India Insurance Co. Ltd. through the Chief Regional Manager,
     Chankya Commercial Complex, R-Block, Patna-1
10. The Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. through the Manager (Legal),
    Alankar Place, Boring Road Crossing, Patna-1.
 Patna High Court CWJC No.480 of 2024 dt.21-02-2025
                                           2/38




  11. The Future Generali, Manager (Legal), Chanakya Square, Exhibition Road,
      Patna-1
  12. ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Limited, through the Legal
      Manager, ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Limited, 2nd Floor,
      Krishna Bhawan Above Axis Bank, Near Dakbanglow Chauraha, Patna- 1.
  13. HDFC Ergo General Insurance Company Limited, through the Legal
      Manager, HDFC Ergo General Insurance Company Limited, Uma Complex,
      Frazer Road, Patna- 1.
  14. TATA AIG General Insurance Company Limited through the Legal Manager,
      TATA AIG General Insurance Company Limited, AMS Park Building, Near
      Boring Road Chauraha, Patna-800001.
  15. Royal Sundaram General Insurance Company Limited, through the Legal
      Manager, Royal Sundaram General Insurance Company Limited 104, C-
      Block, Laxmikant Parisar Near Ambition Business Centre, Jamal Road,
      Frazer Road Area, Patna-1, Bihar.
  16. Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Company Limited, through the
      Legal Manager, Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Company Limited,
      3rd Floor, ID Complex, West Boring Canal Road, Patna, Bihar.
  17. Magma HDI General Insurance Company Limited, through Legal Manager,
      Magma HDI General Insurance Company Limited, 101/102, 1 Floor, Block-
      B Rajendra Ram Plaza, Exhibition Road, Patna, Bihar -800001
  18. IFFCO Tokyo General Insurance Company Limited, through Legal
      Manager, IFFCO Tokyo General Insurance Company Limited, 1st Floor,
      Potash Bhawan, 3 Gokhle Marg, Lucknow- 226001, U.P.
  19. Universal Sompo General Insurance Company Limited, through Legal
      Manager, Universal Sompo General Insurance Company Limited, 2nd Floor,
      Magadh Plaza, Balmichak, Anishabad, Patna-2, Bihar.
  20. Reliance General Insurance Company Limited, through the Legal Manager,
      Reliance General Insurance Company Limited, Thapar House, 163, 4th
      Floor, 4 A SP Mukherjee Road (Mudiali Kalighat), Kolkata- 700026 (West
      Bengal).
  21. Go Digit General Insurance Company Limited, through the Legal Manager,
      Go Digit General Insurance Company Limited, 5th Floor, Office No. 509,
      Patna One Mall, Near Dakbanglow Crossing, Patna-1, Bihar.
  22. Liberty General Insurance Company Limited, through the Legal Manger,
      Liberty General Insurance Company Limited, H. No. 3004, Grand Plaza.
      Frazer Road, Near Dakbanglow Crossing, Patna-1.
  23. SBI General Insurance Company Limited through the Legal Manager, SBI
      General Insurance Company Limited, 401, 4th Floor Patna One Mall, Dak
      Banglow Crossing, Patna- 1, Bihar.
  24. Shriram General Insurance Company Limited through the Legal Manager,
       Shriram General Insurance Company Limited, 4th Floor, Luvkush Tower,
       Exhibition Road, Patna-1.
                                                          ... ... Respondent/s
      ======================================================
                                      with
 Patna High Court CWJC No.480 of 2024 dt.21-02-2025
                                           3/38




                     Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 740 of 2024
       ======================================================
       Pradeep Kumar Giri S/o Sri Birendra Giri, Resident of Adarsh Nagar,
       Chilwaniya Motihari, P.s.-Banjariya, P.O.-Motihari, District-East Champaran,
       Bihar-845401.
                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                          Versus

  1.    The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.
  2.    The Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.
  3.    The Department of Transport through the Principal Secretary, Government
        of Bihar, Patna.
  4.    The Secretary, Department of Transport, Government of Bihar, Patna.
  5.    The General Insurance Council, 5th Floor, National Insurance Building, 14,
        Jamshedji Tata Road, Church Gate, Mumbai, Maharashtra-400020.
  6.    The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. through the Chief Regional Manager,
        BSFC Building, Patna-1.
  7.    The National Insurance Co. Ltd. through the Chief Regional Manager, Sone
        Bhawan, Patna-1.
  8.    The Orinetal Insurance Co. Ltd. through the Chief Regional Manager,
        Pirmuhani, Patna-1.
  9.    The United India Insurance Co. Ltd. through the Chief Regional Manager,
        Chanakya Commercial Complex, R-Block, Patna-1.
  10. The Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. through the Manager (Legal),
      Alankar Place, Boring Road Crossing, Patna-1.
  11. The Future Generali, Manager (Legal), Chanakya Square, Exhibition Road,
      Patna-1.
  12. ICICIC Lombard General Insurance Company Limited through the Legal
      Manager, ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Limited, 2nd Floor,
      Krishna Bhawan Above Axis Bank, Near Dakbanglow Chauraha, Patna-1.
  13. HDFC Ergo General Insurance Company Limited through the Legal
      Manager, HDFC Ergo General Insurance Company Limited, Uma Complex,
      Frazer Road, Patna-1.
  14. TATA AIG General Insurance Company Limited through the Legal Manager,
      TATA AIG General Insurance Company Limited, AMS Park Building, Near
      Boring Road Chauraha, Patna-800001.
  15. Royal Sundaram General Insurance Company Limited through the Legal
      Manager, Royal Sundaram General Insurance Company Limited, 104, C-
      Block, Laxmikant Parisar, Near Ambition Business Centre, Jamal Road,
      Frazer Road Area, Patna-1, Bihar.
  16. Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Company Limited through the Legal
      Manager Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Company Limited, 3rd
      Floor, ID Complex, West Boring Canal Road, Patna, Bihar.
  17. Magma HDI General Insurance Company Limited through Legal Manager,
 Patna High Court CWJC No.480 of 2024 dt.21-02-2025
                                           4/38




        Magma HDI General Insurance Company Limited, 101/102, 1st Floor,
        Block-B Rajendra Ram Plaza, Exhibition Road, Patna, Bihar-800001.
  18. IFFCO Tokyo General Insurance Company Limited, IFFCO Tokyo General
      Insurance Company Limited, 1st Floor, Potash Bhawan, 3 Gokhle Marg,
      Lucknow-226001, U.P.
  19. Universal Sompo General Insurance Company Limited through Legal
      Manager, Universal Sompo General Insurance Company Limited, 2nd Floor,
      Magadh Plaza, Balmichak, Anishabad, Patna-2, Bihar.
  20. Reliance Generael Insurance Company Limited through Legal Manager,
      Reliance Generael Insurance Company Limited, Thapar House 163, 4th
      Floor, 4 A SP Mukherjee Road (Mudiali Kalighat), Kolkata-700026 (West
      Bengal).
  21. Go Digit Genral Insurance Company Limited through the Legal Manager,
      Go Digit Genral Insurance Company Limited, 5th Floor, Office No. 509,
      Patna One Mall, Near Dakbanglow Crossing, Patna-1, Bihar.
  22. Liberty General Insurance Company Limited through the Legal Manager,
      Liberty General Insurance Company Limited, H. No. 3004 Grand Plaza,
      Frazer Road, Near Dakbanglow Crossing, Patna-1.
  23. SBI General Insurance Company Limited through the Legal Manager, SBI
      General Insurance Company Limited, 401, 4th Floor, Patna One Mall Dak
      Banglow Crossing, Patna-1, Bihar.
  24. Shriram General Insurance Company Limited through the Legal Manager,
      Shriram General Insurance Company Limited, 4th Floor, Luvkush Tower,
      Exhibition Road, Patna-1.

                                                 ... ... Respondent/s
       ======================================================
                                 with

                      Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 1166 of 2024
       ======================================================
       Raj Kumar Sah son of Late Durga Prasad Sah, Resident of Village/Mohalla-
       Maithiltola, Mirchaibari, P.S- Katihar, District- Katihar.
                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                           Versus

  1.    The State Of Bihar Through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna-1.
  2.    The Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna-1.
  3.    Transport Department through the Principal Secretary, Government of Bihar,
        Patna.
  4.    The Secretary, Transport Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
  5.    The General Insurance Council, 5th floor, National Insurance Building, 14,
        Jamshedji Tata Road, Church Gate, Mumbai, Maharashtra-400020.
  6.    The National Insurance Co. Ltd. Through the Chief Regional Manager, Sone
        Bhawan, Patna-1.
  7.    The Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. through the Manager (Legal),
 Patna High Court CWJC No.480 of 2024 dt.21-02-2025
                                           5/38




        Alankar Place, Boring Road Crossing, Patna-1.
  8.    The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Through the Chief Regional Manager,
        BSFC Building, Patna-1.
  9.    The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Through the Chief Regional Manager,
        Pirmuhani, Patna-1.
  10. The United India Insurance Co, Ltd. Through the Chief Regional Manager,
      Chanakya Commercial Complex, R. Block, Patna-1.
  11. The Future Generali, Manager (Legal), Chanakya Square, Exhibition Road,
      Patna-1.
  12. ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd. through the Legal
      Manager, ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd, 2nd Floor, Krishna
      Bhawan above Axis Bank, Near Dakbanglow Chauraha, Patna-1.
  13. HDFC Ergo General Insurance Co. Ltd. through the Legal Manager, HDFC
      Ergo General Insurance Co. Ltd, Uma Complex, Frazer Road, Patna-1.
  14. TATA AIG General Insurance Co. Ltd. through the Legal Manager, TATA
      AIG General Insurance Co. Ltd. AMS Park Building, Near Boring Road
      Chauraha, Patna-800001.
  15. Royal Sundaram General Insurance Company Ltd, through the Legal
      Manager, Royal Sundram Insurance Co. Ltd. 104, C-Block, Luxmikant
      Parisar Near Ambition Business Centre, Jamal Road, Patna-1, Bihar.
  16. Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Company Ltd. Through the Legal
      Manager, Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Company Ltd., 3rd Floor,
      ID Complex, West Boring Canal Road, Patna, Bihar.
  17. Magma HDI General Insurance Company Ltd through the Legal Manager,
      Magma HDI General Insurance Company Ltd, 101/102, 1 Floor, Block-B,
      Rajendra Ram Plaza, Exhibition Road, Patna.
  18. IFFCO Tokayo General Insurance Company Ltd through the Legal Manager,
      1st Floor, Potash Bhawan, 3 Gokhle Marg, Lucknow-226001, (UP)
  19. Universal Sompo, General Insurance Company Ltd through the Legal
      Manager, Universal Sompo, General Insurance Company Ltd, 2nd Floor,
      Magadh Plaza, Balmichak, Anishabad, Patna-2, Bihar.
  20. Reliance General Insurance Company Limited, through the Legal Manager,
      Reliance General Insurance Company Limited, Thapar House, 163, 4th
      Floor, 4 A SP Mukherjee Road, (Mudiali Kalighat), Kolkata- 700026 (West
      Bengal).
  21. GO Digit General Insurance Company Limited, through the Legal Manager,
      GO Digit General Insurance Company Limited, 5th Floor, Office No-509,
      Patna One Mall, Near Dakbanglow Crossing, Patna-1. Bihar.
  22. Liberty General Insurance Company Limited, through the Legal Manager,
      Liberty General Insurance Company Limited, H No- 3004, Grand Plaza,
      Fraser Road, Near Dakbanglow Crosssing, Patna-1.
  23. SBI General Insurance Company Limited, through the Legal Manager, SBI
      General Insurance Company Limited, 401 4th Floor, Patna One Mall, Dak
      Banglow Crossing, Patna-1, Bihar.
  24. Shriram General Insurance Company Limited, through the Legal Manager,
 Patna High Court CWJC No.480 of 2024 dt.21-02-2025
                                           6/38




        Shriram General Insurance Company Limited, 4th Floor, Luvkush Tower,
        Exhibition Road, Patna-1.

                                                 ... ... Respondent/s
       ======================================================
                                 with

                     Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 2453 of 2024
       ======================================================
       Anant Kashyap S/o Sri Ram Chhabila Chaudhary, Resident of - Ward No. 13,
       Village - Dhobauli, P.O. - Kumhra Bishnupur, P.S. - Dumra, District -
       Sitamarhi, Bihar - 843323, presently residing at Simra Chowk, P.O. and P.S. -
       Dumra, District - Sitamarhi, Bihar.
                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                           Versus

  1.    The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.
  2.    The Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.
  3.    The Department of Transport through the Principal Secretary, Government
        of Bihar, Patna.
  4.    The Secretary, Department of Transport, Government of Bihar, Patna.
  5.    The General Insurance Council, 5th Floor, National Insurance Building 14,
        Jamshedji Tata Road, Church Gate, Mumbai, Maharashtra- 400020.
  6.    The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. through the Chief Regional Manager,
        BSFC Building, Patna- 1.
  7.    The National Insurance Co. Ltd. through the Chief Regional Manager, Sone
        Bhawan, Patna- 1.
  8.    The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. through the Chief Regional Manager,
        Pirmuhani, Patna - 1.
  9.    The United India Insurance Co. Ltd. through the Chief Regional Manager,
        Chanakya Commercial Complex, R-Block, Patna - 1.
  10. The Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. through the Manager (Legal),
      Alankar Place, Boring Road Crossing, Patna - 1.
  11. The Future Generali, Manager (Legal), Chanakya Square, Exhibition Road,
      Patna - 1.
  12. ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Limited through the Legal
      Manager, ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Limited, 2nd Floor,
      Krishna Bhawan Above Axis Bank, Near Dakbanglow Chauraha, Patna - 1.
  13. HDFC Ergo General Insurance Company Limited through the Legal
      Manager, HDFC Ergo General Insurance Company Limited, Uma Complex,
      Frazer Road, Patna - 1.
  14. TATA AIG General Insurance Company Limited through the Legal Manager,
      TATA AIG General Insurance Company Limited, AMS Park Building, Near
      Boring Road Chauraha, Patna - 800001.
  15. Royal Sundaram General Insurance Company Limited, through the Legal
      Manager, Royal Sundaram General Insurance Company Limited, 104, C-
 Patna High Court CWJC No.480 of 2024 dt.21-02-2025
                                           7/38




        Block, Laxmikant Parisar Near Ambition Business Centre, Jamal Road,
        Frazer Road Area, Patna - 1, Bihar.
  16. Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Company Limited, through the
      Legal Manager, Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Company Limited,
      3rd Floor, ID Complex, West Boring Canal Road, Patna, Bihar.
  17. Magma HDI General Insurance Company Limited, through Legal Manager,
      Magma HDI General Insurance Company Limited, 101/102, 1st Floor,
      Block - B Rajendra Ram Plaza, Exhibition Road, Patna, Bihar- 800001.
  18. IFFCO Tokyo General Insurance Company Limited, through Legal
      Manager, IFFCO Tokyo General Insurance Company Limited, 1st Floor,
      Potash Bhawan, 3 Gokhle Marg, Lucknow- 226001, U.P.
  19. Universal Sompo General Insurance Company Limited, through Legal
      Manager, Universal Sompo General Insurance Company Limited, 2nd Floor,
      Magadh Plaza, Balmichak, Anishabad, Patna - 2, Bihar.
  20. Reliance General Insurance Company Limited, through the Legal Manager,
      Reliance General Insurance Company Limited, Thapar House, 163, 4th
      Floor, 4 A SP Mukherjee Road (Mudiali Kalighat), Kolkata - 700026 (West
      Bengal).
  21. Go Digit General Insurance Company Limited, through the Legal Manager,
      Go Digit General Insurance Company Limited, 5th Floor, Office No. - 509,
      Patna One Mall, Near Dakbanglow Crossing, Patna - 1, Bihar.
  22. Liberty General Insurance Company Limited, through the Legal Manger,
      Liberty General Insurance Company Limited, H. No. 3004, Grand Plaza,
      Frazer Road, Near Dakbanglow Crossing, Patna- 1.
  23. SBI General Insurance Company Limited through the Legal Manager, SBI
      General Insurance Company Limited, 401, 4th Floor Patna One Mall, Dak
      Banglow Crossing, Patna - 1, Bihar.
  24. Shriram General Insurance Company Limited through the Legal Manager,
      Shriram General Insurance Company Limited, 4th Floor, Luvkush Tower,
      Exhibition Road, Patna - 1.

                                                 ... ... Respondent/s
       ======================================================
                                 with

                     Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 2966 of 2024
       ======================================================
       Uday Kumar Thakur Son of Luxman Thakur, Resident of Village/Mohalla-
       Sakahara, Near Kali Mandir, Nawada, P.S- Rajoun, District- Banka.

                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                              Versus

  1.    The State of Bihar Through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna-1.
  2.    The Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna-1.
  3.    Transport Department through the Principal Secretary, Government of Bihar,
        Patna.
 Patna High Court CWJC No.480 of 2024 dt.21-02-2025
                                           8/38




  4.    The Secretary Transport Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
  5.    The General Insurance Council, 5th floor, National Insurance Building, 14,
        Jamshedji Tata Road, Church Gate, Mumbai, Maharashtra-400020.
  6.    The United India Insurance Co, Ltd. Through the Chief Regional Manager,
        Chanakya Commercial Complex, R. Block, Patna-1.
  7.    The Future Generali, Manager (Legal), Chanakya Square, Exhibition Road,
        Patna-1.
  8.    ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd. through the Legal
        Manager, ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd, 2nd Floor, Krishna
        Bhawan above Axis Bank, Near Dakbanglow Chauraha, Patna-1
  9.    The National Insurance Co. Ltd. Through the Chief Regional Manager, Sone
        Bhawan, Patna-1.
  10. The Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. through the Manager (Legal),
      Alankar Place, Boring Road Crossing, Patna-1.
  11. The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Through the Chief Regional Manager,
      BSFC Building, Patna-1.
  12. The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Through the Chief Regional Manager,
      Pirmuhani, Patna-1.
  13. HDFC Ergo General Insurance Co. Ltd. through the Legal Manager, HDFC
      Ergo General Insurance Co. Ltd, Uma Complex, Frazer Road, Patna-1.
  14. TATA AIG General Insurance Co. Ltd. through the Legal Manager, TATA
      AIG General Insurance Co. Ltd. AMS Park Building, Near Boring Road
      Chauraha, Patna- 800001.
  15. Royal Sundaram General Insurance Company Ltd, through the Legal
      Manager, Royal Sundram Insurance Co. Ltd. 104, C-Block, Luxmikant
      Parisar Near Ambition Business Centre, Jamal Road, Patna-1, Bihar.
  16. Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Company Ltd. Through the Legal
      Manager, Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Company Ltd., 3rd Floor,
      ID Complex, West Boring Canal Road. Patna, Bihar.
  17. Magma HDI General Insurance Company Ltd through the Legal Manager,
      Magma HDI General Insurance Company Ltd, 101/102 1st Floor, Block-B,
      Rajendra Ram Plaza, Exhibition Road, Patna.
  18. IFFCO Tokayo General Insurance Company Ltd through the Legal Manager,
      1st Floor, Potash Bhawan, 3 Gokhle Marg, Lucknow-226001, (UP)
  19. Universal Sompo, General Insurance Company Ltd through the Legal
      Manager, Universal Sompo, General Insurance Company Ltd, 2nd Floor,
      Magadh Plaza, Balmichak, Anishabad, Patna-2, Bihar.
  20. Reliance General Insurance Company Limited, through the Legal Manager,
      Reliance General Insurance Company Limited, Thapar House, 163, 4th
      Floor, 4 A SP Mukherjee Road, (Mudiali Kalighat), Kolkata- 700026 (West
      Bengal).
  21. GO Digit General Insurance Company Limited, through the Legal Manager,
      GO Digit General Insurance Company Limited, 5th Floor, Office No-509,
      Patna One Mall, Near Dakbanglow Crossing, Patna-1. Bihar.
 Patna High Court CWJC No.480 of 2024 dt.21-02-2025
                                           9/38




  22. Liberty General Insurance Company Limited, through the Legal Manager,
      Liberty General Insurance Company Limited, H No- 3004, Grand Plaza,
      Fraser Road, Near Dakbanglow Crosssing, Patna-1.
  23. SBI General Insurance Company Limited, through the Legal Manager, SBI
      General Insurance Company Limited, 401 4th Floor, Patna One Mall, Dak
      Banglow Crossing, Patna-1, Bihar.
  24. Shriram General Insurance Company Limited, through the Legal Manager,
      Shriram General Insurance Company Limited, 4th Floor, Luvkush Tower,
      Exhibition Road, Patna-1.

                                                 ... ... Respondent/s
       ======================================================
                                 with

                     Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3265 of 2024
       ======================================================
       Rajdeep Kumar son of Surendra Prasad Yadav, resident of Village Budhi,
       Ward No. -7, Dist.-Madhepura.

                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                              Versus

  1.    The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
  2.    The Department of Transport through the Principal Secretary, Govt. of
        Bihar, Patna.
  3.    The Law Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.
  4.    Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of India through its Secretary,
        New Delhi.
  5.    The Registrar General Patna High Court, Patna.

                                                 ... ... Respondent/s
       ======================================================
                                 with

                     Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 6704 of 2024
       ======================================================
  1.    Shantosh Singh Son of Sri Ram Bahadhur Singh, Resident of village-
        Asaurari Ward no.7, P.O.- Urbrak Nagar, P.S.- Barauni, District- Begusarai.
  2.    Renu Devi, Wife of Shri Shantosh Singh Resident of Village-Asaurari Ward
        no.7, P.O.- Urbrak Nagar, P.S.- Barauni, District- Begusarai.

                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                              Versus

  1.    The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna
        - 1.
  2.    The Chief Secretary Government of Bihar, Patna-1.
 Patna High Court CWJC No.480 of 2024 dt.21-02-2025
                                          10/38




  3.    The Additional Chief Secretary, Transport Department Government of Bihar,
        Patna.
  4.    GO Digit General Insurance company Ltd Through its Legal Manager, GO
        Digit General Insurance Company Ltd. 5th Floor, No. 509, Patna One Mall,
        Near Dak Banglow Crossing, Patna-1, Bihar.

                                                             ... ... Respondent/s
       ======================================================
                                         with
                   Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 17455 of 2024
       ======================================================
       Shoshila Devi Wife of Chaneshwar Manjhi Residence of Village
       Bhagwanganj, Khanpura near Primary School, PS- Masaurhi, Distt. Patna.

                                                                         ... ... Petitioner/s
                                              Versus

  1.    The State of Bihar, through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.-1.
  2.    The Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna-1.
  3.    Transport Department through the Principal Secretary, Government of Bihar,
        Patna.
  4.    The Secretary, Transport Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
  5.    The Secretary of Law Department, Government of Bihar.

                                                 ... ... Respondent/s
       ======================================================
       Appearance :
       (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 480 of 2024)
       For the Petitioner/s     :                 Mr. Durgesh Kumar Singh, Advocate
                                                  Mr. Abhijeet Kumar Singh, Advocate
                                                  Ms. Anjana Sinha, Advocate
       For the State            :                 Mr. P.K. Shahi, AG
                                                Mr. Amish Kumar, Advocate
       (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 627 of 2024)
       For the Petitioner/s     :               Mr. Y. V. Giri, Sr. Advocate
                                                Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate
       For the Respondent No.5-6 & 9-24:        Mr. Durgesh Kumar Singh, Advocate
                                                Mr. Abhijeet Kumar Singh, Advocate
                                                Ms. Anjana Sinha, Advocate
       For the State            :               Mr. P.K. Shahi, AG
                                                Mr. Amish Kumar, Advocate
       (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 740 of 2024)
       For the Petitioner/s     :               Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate
 Patna High Court CWJC No.480 of 2024 dt.21-02-2025
                                          11/38




       For the Respondent No.5-6 & 9-24:        Mr. Durgesh Kumar Singh, Advocate
                                                Mr. Abhijeet Kumar Singh, Advocate
                                                Ms. Anjana Sinha, Advocate
       For the State            :               Mr. P.K. Shahi, AG
                                                Mr. Amish Kumar, Advocate
       (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 1166 of 2024)
       For the Petitioner/s     :               Mr. Debesh Kumar Poddar, Advocate
                                                Mr. Vivekanand Vivek, Advocate
       For the Respondent No.5-6 & 9-24:        Mr. Durgesh Kumar Singh, Advocate
                                                Mr. Abhijeet Kumar Singh, Advocate
                                                Ms. Anjana Sinha, Advocate
       For the State            :               Mr. P.K. Shahi, AG
                                                Mr. Amish Kumar, Advocate
       (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 2453 of 2024)
       For the Petitioner/s     :               Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate
       FFor the Respondent No.5-6 & 9-24:       Mr. Durgesh Kumar Singh, Advocate
                                                Mr. Abhijeet Kumar Singh, Advocate
                                                Ms. Anjana Sinha, Advocate
       For the State            :               Mr. P.K. Shahi, AG
                                                Mr. Amish Kumar, Advocate
       (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 2966 of 2024)
       For the Petitioner/s     :               Mr. Debesh Kumar Poddar, Advocate
                                                Mr. Vivekanand Vivek, Advocate
       For the Respondent No.5-6 & 9-24:        Mr. Durgesh Kumar Singh, Advocate
                                                Mr. Abhijeet Kumar Singh, Advocate
                                                Ms. Anjana Sinha, Advocate
       For the State            :               Mr. P.K. Shahi, AG
                                                Mr. Amish Kumar, Advocate
       (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3265 of 2024)
       For the Petitioner/s     :               Mr. Amandeep Kumar, Advocate
                                                Mr. Surya Narayan Yadav, Advocate
       For the State            :               Mr. P.K. Shahi, AG
                                                Mr. Amish Kumar, Advocate
       For the Respondent U.O.I:                Mr. Dr. K. N. Singh, ASG
                                                Mr. Ram Tujabh Singh, CGC
                                                Ms. Radhika Raman, Sr. CGC
       (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 6704 of 2024)
       For the Petitioner/s     :               Mr. Shailendra Kumar, Advocate
 Patna High Court CWJC No.480 of 2024 dt.21-02-2025
                                          12/38




       For the State            :               Mr. P.K. Shahi, AG
                                                Mr. Amish Kumar, Advocate
       (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 17455 of 2024)
       For the Petitioner/s     :               Mr.Santosh Singh, Advocate
                                                Mr. Shailendra Kumar, Advocate
       For the State            :               Mr. P.K. Shahi, AG
                                                Mr. Amish Kumar, Advocate
       ======================================================
       CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
                and
                HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY
       C.A.V. JUDGMENT
       (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)

 Date : 21-02-2025

     1.          These batch of writ petitions were filed initially for

          declaration of Bihar Motor Vehicle Accident Claims

          Tribunal (Constitution And Service Condition) Rules,

          2023 (hereinafter referred to as the "rules 2023") to be

          bad in law, arbitrary, beyond jurisdiction and ultra vires

          the provisions contained in section 166 (2) of the Motor

          Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as "MV Act,

          1988") on various grounds but primarily on the issue of

          lessening the number of Tribunals for the purpose and for

          not providing for the correct procedure filing of claim

          petitions, in sync with the provisions contained in

          Secion166 (2) of MV Act, 1988 of filing the claim petition
 Patna High Court CWJC No.480 of 2024 dt.21-02-2025
                                          13/38




          before the Tribunal.

     2.          It was also commented upon adversely with respect

          to the constitution and composition of the Search

          Committee for appointing the Chairman and the Members

          of the Tribunal as in the amendment/notification, the

          Search Committee comprised mainly administrative

          Officers, thus falling foul of the judgment in Madras Bar

          Association vs. Union of India; (2021) 7 SCC 369.

     3.          Before dealing with the arguments raised on behalf

          of the writ petitioners, it would be apt to refer to few

          facts which would be self-explanatory.

     4.          Sometimes in the year 2021, a State Level Tribunal

          was constituted in terms of the powers granted to the

          State Government under Section 165 and 176 of the MV

          Act,     1988.        Against       the    aforenoted   notification

          constituting State Level Tribunal vide notification number

          683 and 684 dated 11/08/2021, several writ petitions

          were filed by affected persons including Insurance

          Companies, which was stayed by a Bench of this Court
 Patna High Court CWJC No.480 of 2024 dt.21-02-2025
                                          14/38




          vide order dated 21/12/2022 passed in the aforenoted

          Batch of writ petitions, the lead case being CWJC No.

          2183 of 2022. The stay was granted in view of the

          amendment brought about in Section 166 (3) of the MV

          Act, 1988 w.e.f. 01/04/2022 providing for limitation

          period      for    6    months          for   filing   applications   for

          compensation from the date of occurrence of the accident

          and the notification by the State Government in not

          making such corresponding provisions.

     5.          Shortly thereafter, the Department of Transport

          came out with a fresh draft notification on 19/04/2023,

          on which objections were invited. By the said notification,

          District Level Tribunals were formed. By the aforesaid

          notification, the earlier notification referred to above,

          namely, notification no. 683 and 684 were withdrawn.

     6.          The objections raised by the concerned parties were

          rejected by the Secretary, Transport Department,

          Government of Bihar. Thereafter vide notification dated

          29/05/2023

, the rules of 2023 were notified which was Patna High Court CWJC No.480 of 2024 dt.21-02-2025

gazetted on 30/05/2023.

7. By the aforesaid rules, the Tribunals were

constituted at the district level and the composition of the

Search Committee for the Members and the Chairman of

the Tribunal remained the same, namely,

Secretary/Principal Secretary/ Additional Chief

Secretary, Transport Department; Secretary, Law

Department; an Officer nominated by the General

Administrative Department and; a Deputy Secretary or

Officer on Special Duty in Transport Department. Though

the aforementioned rules of 2023 were gazetted but it

was not found available on the official website of the

Transport Department, Government of Bihar.

8. After about four months, a fresh draft notification

dated 20/09/2023 was uploaded on the website of the

Transport Department, inviting objections. In this draft

notification, the Tribunals were constituted at the

divisional level with practically no change in the

composition of the Search/Screening Committee. Patna High Court CWJC No.480 of 2024 dt.21-02-2025

9. Several objections were raised by all modes of

communication.

10. The objections were with respect to clause- 7 that

no representation of the Judiciary was provided in this

selection and appointment of the Chairperson and clause

-8 whereby the Transport Department had been given

the authority to remove the Chairperson of the Tribunal

on the grounds of misbehaviour, incompetence, laxity in

discharge of duties or of passing order in contravention of

rules enforced by the Government etc.

11. The objection was that such power of removal

of Chairperson should not have been left with the

bureaucracy. There were objections also with respect to

clauses - 10 to 14 as also for lessening the number of

Tribunals by making such Tribunals operate at divisional

level.

12. To the chagrin of the objectors, especially with

respect to their objections having been summarily

rejected without application of mind, the rule was Patna High Court CWJC No.480 of 2024 dt.21-02-2025

ultimately notified and gazetted on 26/10/2023.

13. This led to filing of the present writ petitions

challenging the vires of the rules on ground of

incompetence of the State Legislature/State Government

to make rules in contravention of the provisions

contained in the Central/Parent Act of 1988 and for it to

be arbitrary and not in keeping with the principles

decided in Gohar Ahmad vs. Uttar Pradesh State

Road Transport Corporation and Others; (2023) 4

SCC 381 and Madras Bar Association (supra).

14. During the hearing of these writ petitions, the

learned Advocate General had intimated the court that

the Government would give a re-look at the challenged

rules, specifically with respect to the constitution of

Selection Committee and the removal of the incumbents

appointed to the Tribunal. All the writ petitions,

therefore, were adjourned awaiting the revisit of those

rules by the Government and perhaps proposing

amendment in the rules to bring it in consonance with the Patna High Court CWJC No.480 of 2024 dt.21-02-2025

judgment in Madras Bar Association (Supra).

15. It was also pointed out that the newly constituted

Tribunals were not permitting Advocates to appear, which

charge was specifically denied by the learned Advocate

General. Nonetheless, this Court directed that there shall

be no prohibition for the Advocates appearing for the

parties before the Tribunals.

16. Several other issues also were raised, one of

which is necessarily to be listed, namely, that the

Government had introduced the rules w.e.f. 01/04/2019

against the advice of the learned Advocate General,

which issue was also required to be considered.

17. In the meantime, the Government on a re-look at

the challenged rules, came out with notification contained

in letter no. 9965 dated 27.08.2024, making changes in

rule- 7 of the earlier 2023 rules with regard to

appointment of Members and Chairman of the Tribunal

and the constitution of the Selection Committee for the

said appointments. The Chief Justice of the Patna High Patna High Court CWJC No.480 of 2024 dt.21-02-2025

Court or any Judge nominated by him was to be made

Chairman of that Selection Committee and the other

Members of the selection committee would be the

Registrar General of the Patna High Court, Secretary/

Principal Secretary/ Additional Chief Secretary or any

Representative Officer of the Transport Department;

Secretary-cum-Legal Adviser, Law Department and

Representative Officer of the General Administration

Department.

18. Rule 8 also was amended which dealt with

resignation and removal of Chairman of the claims

Tribunal.

19. It was brought to the notice of the Court that

initially only seven Tribunals were conceived of but the

number was increased to ten divisional level Tribunals

covering the State of Bihar. Thus necessary

amendments were made in the prayer of the writ

petitioners and even with such amendment referred to

above, the challenge mounted earlier continued. Patna High Court CWJC No.480 of 2024 dt.21-02-2025

20. The challenge inter alia was that the State

Government had the power to issue notification only with

respect to territorial jurisdiction under Sections 165 (1)

(4) of the M.V. Act, 1988 and to appoint Members of the

Tribunal under Section 165(2) thereof. It was urged that

under Section 176 of the M.V. Act, 1988, the scope of

issuance of such notification is limited and the State

Government was incompetent to make rules on the

condition of service of the Members of the Tribunals and

selection of Presiding Officers. The use of the words in

Section 176 of the MV Act, 1988 makes it very clear that

rules could be made for the purpose of carrying into

effect the provisions of Sections 165 to 174 of the M.V.

Act of 1988 with respect to, (a) the form of application

for claims for compensation and the particulars, it may

contain and the fees, if any, to be paid in respect of

search applications; (b) the procedure to be followed by

the claims Tribunal in holding an inquiry under this

chapter; (c) the powers vested in a Civil Court which may Patna High Court CWJC No.480 of 2024 dt.21-02-2025

be exercised by a claims Tribunal; (d) the form and the

manner in which and the fee ( if any) on payment of

which, an appeal may be preferred against an award of a

Claims Tribunal and; (e) any other matter which is to be

or may be prescribed.

21. Thus the rule making power of the State could not

have been extended to what has been done in the present

set of rules.

22. It was argued that in Kerala State Electricity

Board vs. Thomas Joseph; 2022 SCC OnLine SC

1737, it was held that if a rule goes beyond the rule

making powers conferred by the statue, the same would

be required to be declared invalid. A rule could not

supplant any provision for which power has not been

conferred and the basic test to determine and consider is

the source power which is relatable to the rule. Similarly,

a rule must be in accord with the parent statute and

cannot travel beyond it. The doctrine of ultra vires

envisages that a rule making body must function within Patna High Court CWJC No.480 of 2024 dt.21-02-2025

the purview of rules making authority conferred on it by

the parent act. There is no inherent power of its own,

which could be invoked to make rules. It was also argued

that the Supreme Court in Global Energy Limited vs.

Central Electricity Commission; (2009)15 SCC

570, has clarified that the rule making power for carrying

out the purpose of the act is a general delegation which

may not be used for laying down any other guidelines. By

reason of such a provision alone, the regulation making

power cannot be exercised so as to bring into existence or

affect substantive rights or obligations or disabilities

which are not contemplated in terms of the provisions of

the act.

23. The Second challenge was regarding the fact that

notwithstanding the notification of 2024, bringing about

changes in rule 7 and 8 of the 2023 rules, the Screening

Committee was still not free from executive control. The

Secretary of the Tribunal ought not to be an

administrative Officer of the Transport Department as the Patna High Court CWJC No.480 of 2024 dt.21-02-2025

Transport Department is more often than not, a litigant

before such Tribunal. The independence of the Tribunal

will only be secured when even the administrative

function would be in the hands of judicial body, otherwise

there would be complete absence of any link with the

parent department.

24. In support of the aforenoted contention, it was

argued that in Madras Bar Association (supra), it was

clearly sounded that independent judicial Tribunals for

determination of the rights of citizens and for the

adjudication of the disputes and complaints of the

citizens, is a necessary concomitant of the rule of law.

25. The argument on this point thus was concluded that

with the Secretary of the Tribunal hailing from the

sponsoring department, it cannot be said that there

would be no control of the bureaucracy over the Tribunal.

A non-Judicial Member in any capacity ought not to be

appointed in Motor Accidents Claim Tribunal.

26. The third argument advanced was that divisional Patna High Court CWJC No.480 of 2024 dt.21-02-2025

level Tribunals provided under rules of 2023, makes

access to justice illusory. Motor Vehicles Act is a

beneficial legislation, the fruits of which ought not to

have been kept up and hanging for poor and indigent. No

reasonable explanation appears to be available with the

Government for shifting the jurisdiction from district level

to divisional level. Reference in this context was made to

the judgment in Anita Kushwaha vs. Pushap Sudan;

(2016) 8 SCC 509, which declared that access to

justice is indeed a facet of right to life, guaranteed under

Article 21 of the Constitution as also a facet of right

guaranteed under Article 14 of the Constitution which

guarantees equality before law and equal protection of

laws.

27. The other argument raised was whether the rules

made, could be enforced retrospectively. The 2023 rules

were amended on 27/08/2024 declaring that it shall

apply on all pending cases filed on or after 01/04/2019.

In support of the aforenoted argument, it was suggested Patna High Court CWJC No.480 of 2024 dt.21-02-2025

that chapter- 11 of the MV Act, 1988 was amended In

the year 2019, but it came into force only from

01/04/2022. Section 212 (2) of the MV Act, 1988

further provides that any modification or annulment in

the rule so made, shall be without prejudice to the

validity of anything previously done under the rule,

scheme or notification.

28. Lastly, it was argued that the form for filing the

complaint provided by the Transport Department on the

portal falls foul of Section 166 (1) and (2) of the MV Act,

1988. It was also pointed out that no provision has been

made in the form issued by the Transport Department on

the web portal about accidents occurring outside the

State of Bihar but the claimants being residents of Bihar.

There is no option for them to file their claims in the

State of Bihar. Thus, larger public interest has been

adversely affected with the promulgation of the rules

2023 and the amendment brought out in the year 2024.

It was thus argued that the rules are practically Patna High Court CWJC No.480 of 2024 dt.21-02-2025

uninformed by reason and therefore are arbitrary.

29. Responding to the aforenoted contentions, the

learned Advocate General has argued that a statutory

rule cannot be declared ultra-vires on the grounds of

inconvenience and that too without any basis for

concluding the same but only on presumptions. A

statutory rule could be declared ultra vires only if it is

shown that it is beyond the Legislative competence or is

in breach of any enactment or violates any provision of

the Constitution. With the establishment of ten Tribunals

at divisional level, with utmost clarity that the numbers

shall not remain perpetually the same, the Government

of the day has only shown its consciousness and alacrity

to the situation. On periodical review, as and when

necessity for creation of more Tribunals would be felt in

the interest of the accident victims, the Government

would consider the same and increase the number of

Tribunals. In fact, initially, only seven Tribunals were

conceived of at divisional level but the number was Patna High Court CWJC No.480 of 2024 dt.21-02-2025

immediately increased to ten, repelling any doubt that

when need would arise, more number of Tribunals will

not be created. The ten newly dedicated claims

Tribunals, according to the Government, have been

constituted for the purpose of providing speedy justice to

the people. The jurisdictional area of the Tribunal has

also been clearly defined along with the divisional

headquarter where the Tribunal would be located. Such a

decision was not made without any assessment of

pending cases. Even the future accretion in the number

of cases have been taken into account for making

dedicated divisional level Tribunals. The assessment was

based on the inputs that number of pending cases did not

justify more than ten Tribunals, especially when such

Tribunals were exclusively dedicated for deciding claim

cases. Hitherto, one court of the District Judge /

Additional District Judge was operating as a Tribunal in

that district. The finance involved is not the consideration

of the Government. The number has been fixed at ten Patna High Court CWJC No.480 of 2024 dt.21-02-2025

presently, which could be changed if situation so

demands. The highest number of pending cases is in

Patna division is only 73; in Saran division, there are only

10 pending cases. Similarly the numbers of such cases is

less in Bhagalpur, Munger, Muzaffarpur, Darbhanga etc.

The earlier Tribunals were dealing with such claim cases

along with the other areas of litigation.

30. In sum and substance, the argument of the State is

that the rules have been framed after considering the due

process of law.

31. To evaluate the arguments advanced on behalf of

the parties, it would be necessary to extract the

provisions contained in sections 165, 166 and 176 of the

MV, Act 1988 for ready reference and completeness:-

165. Claims Tribunals.--(1) A State Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, constitute one or more Motor Accidents Claims Tribunals (hereafter in this Chapter referred to as Claims Tribunal) for such area as may be specified in the notification for the purpose of adjudicating upon claims for compensation in respect of accidents involving the death of, or bodily injury to, persons arising out of the use of motor vehicles, or damages to any property of a third party so arising, or both. Explanation.--For the removal of doubts, it is hereby declared that the expression "claims for compensation in respect of accidents involving the death of or bodily injury to persons arising out of the use of motor vehicles" includes claims for compensation under section 1401 [and section 163A].

(2) A Claims Tribunal shall consist of such number of members as the Patna High Court CWJC No.480 of 2024 dt.21-02-2025

State Government may think fit to appoint and where it consists of two or more members, one of them shall be appointed as the Chairman thereof. (3) A person shall not be qualified for appointment as a member of a Claims Tribunal unless he--

(a) is, or has been, a Judge of a High Court, or

(b) is, or has been, a District Judge, or

(c) is qualified for appointment as a Judge of a High Court1 [or as a District Judge].

(4) Where two or more Claims Tribunals are constituted for any area, the State Government, may by general or special order, regulate the distribution of business among them.

166. Application for compensation.--(1) An application for compensation arising out of an accident of the nature specified in sub-section (1) of section 165 may be made--

(a) by the person who has sustained the injury; or

(b) by the owner of the property; or

(c) where death has resulted from the accident, by all or any of the legal representatives of the deceased; or

(d) by any agent duly authorised by the person injured or all or any of the legal representatives of the deceased, as the case may be:

Provided that where all the legal representatives of the deceased have not joined in any such application for compensation, the application shall be made on behalf of or for the benefit of all the legal representatives of the deceased and the legal representatives who have not so joined, shall be impleaded as respondents to the application. [(2) Every application under sub-section (1) shall be made, at the option of the claimant, either to the Claims Tribunal having jurisdiction over the area in which the accident occurred or to the Claims Tribunal within the local limits of whose jurisdiction the claimant resides or carries on business or within the local limits of whose jurisdiction the defendant resides, and shall be in such form and contain such particulars as may be prescribed:

Provided that where no claim for compensation under section 140 is made in such application, the application shall contain a separate statement to that effect immediately before the signature of the applicant.]

***** [(4) The Claims Tribunal shall treat any report of accidents forwarded to it under sub-section (6) of section 158 as an application for compensation under this Act.]

176. Power of State Government to make rules.--A State Government may make rules for the purpose of carrying into effect the provisions of sections 165 to 174, and in particular, such rules may provide for all or any of the following matters, namely:--

(a) the form of application for claims for compensation and the particulars it may contain, and the fees, if any, to be paid in respect of such applications;

(b) the procedure to be followed by a Claims Tribunal in holding an inquiry under this Chapter;

(c) the powers vested in a Civil Court which may be exercised by a Claims Tribunal; (d) the form and the manner in which and the fees (if any) on Patna High Court CWJC No.480 of 2024 dt.21-02-2025

payment of which an appeal may be preferred against an award of a Claims Tribunal; and

(e) any other matter which is to be, or may be, prescribed

32. On perusal of the aforenoted provisions of the

Parent Act, the State Government's power to make rules

constituting one or more Motor Accidents Claims

Tribunals is clearly established. Section 166 provides for

the contents of the application for compensation arising

out of an accident. Section 166 (2) which was introduced

w.e.f. 14.11.1994 gives the option to the claimant to

either file his claim before the Claims Tribunal having

jurisdiction over the area in which the accident occurred,

or to the Claims Tribunal within the local limits of whose

jurisdiction the claimants reside or carries on business or

within the local limits of whose jurisdiction the defendant

resides and shall be in such form and contain such

particulars as may be prescribed.

33. From the perusal of the rules of 2023, the

presumption of the rules not being in sync with the

provisions contained in Section 166(2) of the MV Act,

1988 appears to be unfounded and uncalled for.

Patna High Court CWJC No.480 of 2024 dt.21-02-2025

34. It was brought to our notice that henceforth no

victim or their legal representatives would have to move

physically for filing their claim applications. For filing

claim applications, an online portal has been developed

by the State Government for convenience of accident

victims, considering their physical as well as mental

conditions. Any claimant could file their claim application

by using their own personal credentials. It could be filed

from any place using any cyber cafe. The rules of 2023

do not infringe, in any way, the freedom of selection of

claims Tribunal of its choice in accordance with the

section 166 (2) of the Parent Act. They could also appear

before such Tribunal virtually.

35. In Gohar Mohammad (supra), the Supreme Court

had directed that the State authorities would take

appropriate steps to develop a joint web portal/platform

to co-ordinate and facilitate the stakeholders for the

purposes of carrying out the provisions of Motor Vehicles

Amendment Act and the Rules in coordination with any Patna High Court CWJC No.480 of 2024 dt.21-02-2025

technical agency and be notified to the public at large. In

the light of what was directed in Gohar Mohammad

(supra) by the Supreme Court, an online portal has been

developed by the State Government. A facility of digital

mode of hearing of cases has also been provided. It

would only be appropriate to extract the Government

order contained in memo number 344 dated 16/01/2024

in support of what has been contented on behalf of the

Government :-

fcgkj ljdkj

ifjogu foHkkx

la0l0 344 iVuk fnukad%& 16@1@2024

vkns"k

ifjogu foHkkx dh vf/klwpuk la0&7997] fnukad 20-10-2023 ¼xtV la[;k&885] fnukad 26- 10-2023½ }kjk fcgkj eksVjokgu nq?kZVuk nkok U;k;kf/kdj.k ¼xBu ,oa lsok"krZ½ fu;ekoyh] 2023 vf/klwfpr gSA mDr vf/klwpuk }kjk iVuk] x;k] lkj.k] eqtQ~Qjiqj ,oa njHkaxk izeaMy gsrq ,d&,d rFkk Hkkxyiqj ,oa eqaxsj izeaMy ¼eq[;ky; Hkkxyiqj½ ds fy, la;qDr :i ls ,d rFkk iwf.k;kW ,oa lgjlk izeaMy ¼eq[;ky; iwf.kZ;kW½ ds fy, la;qDr :i ls ,d eksVj okgu nq?kZVuk nkok U;k;kf/kdj.k dk xBu fd;k x;k gSA

2- mi;qZDr eksVj okgu nq?kZVuk nkok U;k;kf/kdj.k esa v/;{k dh fu;qfDr ,oa inLFkkiu fd;k tk pqdk gSA Non Hit & Run ls lacaf/kr lHkh ekeys dh lquokbZ uoxfBr nkok U;k;kf/kdj.k esa dh tk;sxhA

3- vketuksa ds fgr dks ns[krs gq, okgu nq?kZVuk ls lacaf/kr oknksa dks Rofjr fu'iknu ds mn~ns"; ls nk;j nkok oknksa dh lquokbZ nkok U;k;kf/kdj.k ds ifjlj esa rFkk LkkFk&gh&lkFk fdlh Hkh ek/;e ls Digital dh tk ldsxhA

4- rn~uqlkj oknh@oknh ds dkuwuh izfrfuf/k@chek dEiuh@chek dEiuh ds dkuwuh izfrfuf/k nq?kZVuk nkok U;k;kf/kdj.k esa O;fDrxr :i ls mifLFkr gksdj vFkok fdlh Hkh Digital ek/;e ls vius lqfo/kktud LFkku ls okn dh lquokbZ esa Hkkx ys ldrs gSaA

g0@& mi lfpo] ifjogu foHkkx] fcgkj] iVukA Patna High Court CWJC No.480 of 2024 dt.21-02-2025

Kkikad&-----344-------------- iVuk fnukad%& 16@1@2024

izfrfyfi%& lfpo] lHkh eksVj okgu nq?kZVuk nkok U;k;kf/kdj.k@lHkh chek dEiuh dks lwpukFkZ ,oa vko";d dkjZokbZ gsrq izsf'krA

g0@& mi lfpo]

ifjogu foHkkx] fcgkj] iVukA

36. It would also be relevant to state here that in the

light of the judgment in Gohar Mohammad (supra), a

new investigative process has been notified by the

Central Government, which has been endorsed by the

Supreme Court, which mandates that the victims have to

file their details in prescribed format to police and all

reports by police after verification and investigation is to

be submitted through a portal developed by MORTH. It

only facilitates the filing of claim petition which has not to

be filed like any suit before the Civil Court.

37. There is no bar on the lawyers appearing in these

Tribunals either physically or virtually.

38. A conjoint reading of Section 165, 166 and 176 of

the MV Act, 1988 would reflect that the rules of 2023

(amended in 2024) would clearly pass the muster. Patna High Court CWJC No.480 of 2024 dt.21-02-2025

39. With the change in the composition of the

Screening Committee, making it in line with the judgment

in Madras Bar Association (supra), removes that

defect also in the rules viz. the committee would be under

the influence of the parent Department of Transport.

40. The contentions raised on behalf of the writ

petitioners with respect to the power of the Government

to make such rules and the extent of it stands answered.

The Government has the power to make rules and also

decide about number of Tribunals in the State of Bihar.

41. In Sanjeev Coke Manufacturing Company vs

Bharat Cooking Coal Ltd; ( 1983) 1 SCC 147, a

five Judge Bench of the Supreme Court had held that

"scales of justice are just not designed to weigh

competing social and economic factors. In such matters,

legislative wisdom must prevail and judicial review must

abstain".

42. The judicial review of Government Policies/rules

encapsulates determining whether they infringe upon the Patna High Court CWJC No.480 of 2024 dt.21-02-2025

fundamental rights of citizens, contravene constitutional

provisions, violate statutory regulations and display

manifest arbitrariness, capriciousness or malafides (refer

to Maharashtra State Board of Secondary and

Higher Secondary Education vs. Paritosh Bhupesh

Kumar Sheth: 1984 (4) SCC 27).

43. The focus of judicial scrutiny is limited to the

legality of the policy, excluding any evaluation of its

wisdom and soundness. The Court cannot compel the

Government to formulate a policy, evaluate alternatives

or assess the effectiveness of existing policies. This

constraints stems from the principle of separation of

powers, where the Courts lack the democratic mandate

and institutional expertise to delve into such matters.

While the Court cannot look into these aspects, the Court

can definitely check the Constitutional validity of a policy

or a rule or a statute (refer to IN RE: Section 6A of

Citizenship Act, 1955, 2024 SCC OnLine SC

2880) Patna High Court CWJC No.480 of 2024 dt.21-02-2025

44. Fixing a cut-off date retrospectively is not to be

read in isolation but with the provision contained in the

rules of 2023 and the amendment of 2024 regarding

repeals and savings. The power to make law by an

authority also entails in it a power to repeal law or to

make it prospective or retrospective. The watershed date

is with a reason, namely, that all cases after a particular

date would stand transferred to the newly constituted

Tribunals with the territorial jurisdiction defined so that

the newer cases are decided speedily.

45. With respect to creating ten Tribunals, thus

reducing the number from many to limited resulting in

the distortion of the principle of access to justice, it needs

be noticed that in Anita Kushwaha (supra), the

Supreme Court has clearly held that it forms a necessary

component of Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

However, after having said that, the Supreme Court also

formulated four facets constituting the essence of access

of justice, namely, (1) the State must provide an Patna High Court CWJC No.480 of 2024 dt.21-02-2025

effective adjudicatory mechanism; (2) the mechanism so

provided must be reasonably accessible in terms of

distance; (3) the process of adjudication must be speedy;

and (4) the litigants access to adjudicatory process must

be affordable.

46. Testing the validity of the rules of 2023 and the

amendment of 2024 on this score, we have no difficulty

in holding that the Tribunals so constituted provide an

effective adjudicatory mechanism, which is in consonance

with the provisions of Section 166 (2) of the Parent Act.

Out of 38 districts, 10 Tribunals, which number could

increase in future as well, clearly covers the State of

Bihar with contiguous districts falling within the territorial

jurisdiction of each of the Divisional Tribunal. This does

not make it any less accessible than what a litigant would

expect. With the new portal having been developed and

the investigative process endorsed by the Supreme Court

having been introduced, the accessibility to justice has

become speedier, cheaper and transparent. The process Patna High Court CWJC No.480 of 2024 dt.21-02-2025

also makes it affordable.

47. Thus, we find that the rules of 2023 along with the

amendment of 2024 are completely in consonance with

the provisions contained in Section 165, 166 and 176 of

the M.V. Act, 1988 as also the dictum of the Supreme

Court in Gohar Mohammad (supra) and Anita

Kushwaha (supra).

48. The challenge in these writ petitions therefore fails.

49. All the writ petitions are dismissed.

50. All the Interlocutory application/s, if any, also stands

disposed off.

(Ashutosh Kumar, ACJ)

( Partha Sarthy, J)

sunilkumar/-

AFR/NAFR                  NAFR
CAV DATE                  30.01.2025
Uploading Date            21.02.2025
Transmission Date         N/A
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter