Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Manju Sinha vs Muzaffarpur Municipal Corporation ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 1904 Patna

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1904 Patna
Judgement Date : 20 February, 2025

Patna High Court

Manju Sinha vs Muzaffarpur Municipal Corporation ... on 20 February, 2025

Author: P. B. Bajanthri
Bench: P. B. Bajanthri, Sunil Dutta Mishra
          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                        Letters Patent Appeal No.565 of 2022
                                          In
                    Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4129 of 2018
     ======================================================
     Manju Sinha, widow of Late Santosh Kumar Sinha, Resident of Village-
     Harpur Lahori, Sri Ram Nagar Ward No. 12, P.O.- M.I.T., P.S. Yahiyapur,
     District- Muzaffarpur.
                                                               ... ... Appellant.
                                        Versus
1.    Muzaffarpur Municipal Corporation through Municipal Commissioner,
      Muzaffarpur.
2.   Municipal Commissioner, Muzaffarpur Corporation, District- Muzaffarpur.
3.   The State of Bihar through Collector, Muzaffarpur.
                                               ... ... Respondents.
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Appellant     :       Mr. Naresh Chandra Verma, Advocate.
     For the State         :       Mr. Yogendra Pd. Sinha, AAG-7.
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI
             and
             HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
     ORAL JUDGMENT

(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI)

Date : 20-02-2025

I.A. No.1 of 2025:

Heard I.A. No.1 of 2025 for condonation of a delay of

about 19 days in filing the present L.P.A. No.565 of 2022.

2. For the reasons stated in I.A. No.1 of 2025 read

with affidavit, delay of about 19 days in filing L.P.A. No.565 of

2022 stands condoned.

3. Accordingly, I.A. No.1 of 2025 stands allowed.

L.P.A. No.565 of 2022:

4. In the present L.P.A. No.565 of 2022, appellant has

assailed the order of the learned Single Judge dated 29.08.2022 Patna High Court L.P.A No.565 of 2022 dt.20-02-2025

passed in C.W.J.C. No.4129 of 2018.

5. The relief(s) sought for by the appellant in C.W.J.C.

No.4129 of 2018 is read as under:

"For issuance of a direction to the

Respondents to remove the Road and

Nala from the Private Raiyati Land of

the petitioner bearing plot No.139 of

Khata No.26 of Mauza Harpur Lahori

now Sri Ram Nagar ward No.12 under

Ahiyar pur police Station of

Muzaffarpur Town."

6. The learned Single Judge has not interfered on the

sole ground that C.W.J.C. No.4129 of 2018 is not maintainable

in view of the relief(s) sought by the appellant in the writ

petition (C.W.J.C. No.4129 of 2018).

7. Appellant's grievance is directing the Respondent

authorities to remove the road and nala constructed over the

private raiyati land of the petitioner bearing plot no.139, khata

no.26, mauza-Harpur Lahori now Sri Ram Nagar situated at

ward no.12 under the Ahiyar Pur police station, District-

Muzaffarpur Town.

8. The relief(s) sought in the present lis is relating to Patna High Court L.P.A No.565 of 2022 dt.20-02-2025

civil dispute to the extent that who has encroached the

appellant's property or acquired the property of the appellant in

the aforementioned plot. Therefore, civil dispute cannot be

adjudicated under Article 226 of the Constitution as held by the

Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Swati Ferro Alloys

Private Limited Versus Orissa Industrial Infrastructure

Development Corporation (IDCO) and others, reported in

(2015) 4 Supreme Court Cases 204. Therefore, the appellant

has not made out a case so as to interfere with the order of the

learned Single Judge dated 29.08.2022 passed in C.W.J.C.

No.4129 of 2018.

9. At this juncture, learned counsel for the appellant

pointed out counter affidavit filed on behalf of the Circle Officer

in respect of communication dated 16.08.2022 which supports

the opinion of the Circle Officer in favour of the appellant. If it

is so, appellant has a remedy before the Circle Officer or next

higher authority insofar as redressing his grievance or else he

has a remedy of filing civil suit before the concerned Civil

Courts jurisdiction.

10. With the aforesaid observation(s), the present

L.P.A. No.565 of 2022 stands disposed of, while affirming the

order of the learned Single Judge dated 29.08.2022 passed in Patna High Court L.P.A No.565 of 2022 dt.20-02-2025

C.W.J.C. No.4129 of 2018.

(P. B. Bajanthri, J)

( Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)

P.S./-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                NA
Uploading Date          25.02.2025.
Transmission Date       NA
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter