Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mahendra Kumar Sharma vs The Union Of India
2025 Latest Caselaw 1789 Patna

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1789 Patna
Judgement Date : 14 February, 2025

Patna High Court

Mahendra Kumar Sharma vs The Union Of India on 14 February, 2025

Author: Partha Sarthy
Bench: Partha Sarthy
          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                   Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2134 of 2025
     ======================================================
     Mahendra Kumar Sharma, Son of Dhaneshwar Sharma, Resident of New
     Colony, Ward No.9, Nagar Parishad Saharsa, District- Saharsa, Bihar-852201.

                                                             ... ... Petitioner/s
                                     Versus
1.   The Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Housing and Urban
     Affairs, Government of India.
2.   The Joint Secretary and Mission Director in charge of Pradhan Mantri Awas
     Yojana, (Urban)- Housing for All, Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs.
3.   The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Urban Development and
     Housing Department, Bihar, Patna.
4.   The Chief Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, Bihar,
     Patna.
5.   The Convener, Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojna, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
6.   The State Nodal Officer, Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojna (Urban), Bihar.
7.   The Municipal Commissioner, Saharsha Municipal Corporation, Saharsa.
8.   The Mayor, Saharsa Municipal Corporation, Saharsa.
9.   The District Magistrate, Saharsa.
10. Ravi Raj, Municipal Civil Engineer, Saharsa.
11. Deepak Roy, Management Information System Specialist, Awas Nagar
    Nigam, Saharsa.

                                               ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr. Abhishek Kumar Srivastava, Advocate
                                   Mr. Ravi Raj, Advocate
                                   Mr. Aditya Raj Singh, Advocate
                                   Ms. Rana Veer Prawar, Advocate
     For the Respondent/s   :      Mr. Kumar Gangesh Gunjan, CGC
                                   Mr. Abhay Shanker Singh, Advocate
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
             and
             HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY
     ORAL JUDGMENT

(Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)

Date : 14-02-2025

After some arguments, the learned counsel for

the petitioner withdraws the prayer Nos. 1, 2 and 4, and Patna High Court CWJC No.2134 of 2025 dt.14-02-2025

only presses prayer No. 3, viz., the issuance of writ in the

nature of mandamus for commanding the respondents to

make proper inquiry by an independent agency with

respect to the irregularities in the list of priorities for

beneficiaries for allotment of Pradhan Mantri Awas for the

said district of Saharsa.

2. The accusation levelled by the petitioner in

this writ petition is that non-deserving people, having

sufficient financial strength and possessing houses in the

area have been made beneficiaries to the exclusion of

others who needed to be and would have benefitted, if the

scheme were properly implemented.

3. Notwithstanding the fact that a general and

vague statement has been made about such irregularity in

the writ petition, we deem it appropriate in the present

circumstance to direct that in case the petitioner would

point out such irregularities to the District Magistrate of

the district, he would at least go through it; make an

inquiry at his level and have it rectified. In case the Patna High Court CWJC No.2134 of 2025 dt.14-02-2025

accusation is found to be incorrect, the same also shall be

intimated to the petitioner.

4. We, therefore, permit the petitioner to

approach the District Magistrate of Saharsa with specific

instances of wrong persons having been made

beneficiaries of Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojna, in which case

the District Magistrate shall have it inquired and shall

intimate the petitioner through post and telephonically

about the action taken in this regard.

5. With the aforenoted direction, the writ

petition stands disposed of.





                                                              (Ashutosh Kumar, ACJ)


                                                               (Partha Sarthy, J)
Anushka/Rajesh
AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                NA
Uploading Date          17.02.2025
Transmission Date
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter