Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ameeraka Devi vs The State Of Bihar Through Director ...
2024 Latest Caselaw 82 Patna

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 82 Patna
Judgement Date : 4 January, 2024

Patna High Court

Ameeraka Devi vs The State Of Bihar Through Director ... on 4 January, 2024

Author: Harish Kumar

Bench: Harish Kumar

         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                   Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18435 of 2022
     ======================================================
     Ameeraka Devi W/o Late Yadunath Kuwar R/o Village- Berwa, P.S.- Gaighat,
     District- Muzaffarpur.
                                                              ... ... Petitioner/s
                                       Versus
1.    The State of Bihar through Director General of Police (Welfare Budget
      Appeal) Bihar, Patna.
2.   Inspector General of Police Bihar, Patna.
3.   Deputy Inspector General of Police, Saran Range, Chapra.
4.   Deputy Inspector General of Police, Darbhanga Range, Darbhanga.
5.   Superintendent of Police Rail, Muzaffarpur.
                                               ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr. Shiva Shankar Sharma
     For the Respondent/s   :      Mr. Md. N.H. Khan (SC 1)
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
                         ORAL JUDGMENT
     Date : 04-01-2024

                   Heard Mr. Shiv Shankar Sharma, learned counsel

      appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Md. N. H. Khan,

      learned Standing Counsel -1 for the State.

                   2. The short facts, which led to the filing of the

      present writ petition are that the petitioner's husband namely,

      Late Yadunath Kuwar was appointed as Constable under the

      Railway       Superintendent       of      Police,      Muzffarpur     on

      compassionate ground on 01.03.1983 on account of death of his

      brother namely, Baidyanath Kunwar, who died on 01.07.1978,

      in an encounter with the dacoits.

                   3. In fact on account of sudden demise of Baidyanath

      Kunwar, on the request made by the family members, who were
 Patna High Court CWJC No.18435 of 2022 dt.04-01-2024
                                           2/4




         facing starvation, the husband of the petitioner was given

         appointment on compassionate ground. After a long period of

         time, the wife of late Baidyanath Kunwar filed a petition before

         the Director General of Police stating therein that the elder

         brother of her late husband was appointed as Constable on the

         basis of forged and fabricated educational certificates. On being

         found no response, she filed CWJC No. 19836 of 2011, which

         application was disposed of vide order dated 01.07.2011 with a

         direction to the respondents to decide the representation by

         passing a speaking order within a period of two months.

         Pursuant to the direction of this Court an enquiry was conducted

         and it has been found that the date of birth of the petitioner's

         husband was mentioned as 20.05.1951 in the certificate of

         Middle School Examination. However, he obtained the

         appointment on compassionate ground by furnishing a false

         certificate of IXth Class, mentioning his date of birth as

         20.10.1956

, which is entered in the service book.

4. Taking note of the aforesaid enquiry report, the

petitioner was put to departmental proceeding which resulted

into compulsory retirement with a further direction that the

husband of the petitioner had obtained his appointment on the

basis of forged educational certificate and he ought to have Patna High Court CWJC No.18435 of 2022 dt.04-01-2024

superannuated on 31.05.2011. Thus, a decision has also been

taken to recover the salary amount paid to him for the period

01.06.2011 to 31.01.2015. The order of the disciplinary

authority issued under the signature of Superintendent of Police,

Saran as contained in Memo No. 385 dated 03.01.2015 has been

brought on record by way of Annexure C to the counter affidavit

filed on behalf of the respondent No. 5.

5. It is further submitted on behalf of the petitioner

that pursuant to the order of the disciplinary authority an FIR

bearing Town P.S. Case No. 127 of 2015 was also instituted

against the petitioner's husband. While the proceeding was

going on, in connection with the aforenoted criminal case, in the

meantime, the husband of the petitioner died on 11.03.2022 and,

thus, the criminal trial abated on account of his death. It is the

case of the petitioner that thereafter she filed several

representations before the higher authority but till date the

admissible retiral dues after deducting excess payment has not

been accorded to her.

6. At this stage, learned Standing Counsel-1

submitted that since the very appointment of the petitioner was

based on forged and fabricated educational certificate, apart

from concealment of date of birth as also the appointment being Patna High Court CWJC No.18435 of 2022 dt.04-01-2024

illegal and void ab initio, thus in such circumstances no benefit

could be granted to her.

7. Considering the submissions made on behalf of the

parties and taking note of the final order passed by the

disciplinary authority in the departmental proceeding, wherein

specific direction was given that the admissible compulsory

retiral benefits and other dues shall be made after disposal of the

criminal trial, which has now already been abated on account of

death of the erstwhile employee. In such view of the matter, this

Court directs the respondent No. 5 to consider the representation

of the petitioner in the light of the fact that the criminal trial has

already abated on account of death of the erstwhile employee,

and shall pass an order on the representation filed by the

petitioner ensuring payment of admissible compulsory retiral/

terminal dues of the petitioner's husband found payable,

preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of

receipt/production of a copy of this order.

8. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of.

(Harish Kumar, J)

Anjani/-

AFR/NAFR
CAV DATE
Uploading Date           09.01.2024
Transmission Date
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter