Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Suman Kumar Deva vs The State Of Bihar
2024 Latest Caselaw 80 Patna

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 80 Patna
Judgement Date : 4 January, 2024

Patna High Court

Suman Kumar Deva vs The State Of Bihar on 4 January, 2024

Author: Harish Kumar

Bench: Harish Kumar

          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                    Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17243 of 2022
     ======================================================
     Suman Kumar Deva, S/O Ramashray Prasad, Resident of Mohalla-
     Sribhawan, A-25, Ashokpuri, Khajpura, P.O.- B.V. College, Patna- 800014,
     District- Patna.

                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                           Versus
1.   The State of Bihar.
2.   The Vice Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya.
3.   The Vice Chancellor Patliputra University, Patna- 800020.
4.   The Principal Secretary, Higher Education Dept. Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
5.   The Registrar, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya.
6.   The Registrar, Patliputra University, Patna- 800020.
7.   The Finance Officer, Patliputra University, Patna- 800020.
8.   The Finance Officer, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya.
9.   The Accountant General (A and E), Bihar, Patna.
10. The Principal S.D.S. College, Kaler, Arwal- 824127.
11. The Principal, B.S. College, Danapur, Patna- 800012.

                                               ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s         :    Mr. Mahendra Prasad Verma, Advocate
     For the Respondent/s         :    Mr. Madhukar Mishra, AC to SC-16
     For the Magadh University :       Mr. Sunit Kumar, Advocate
     For the Patliputra University :   Mr. Rana Vikram Singh, Advocate
                                       Ms. Rasika, Advocate
     For the Accountant General :      Mr. Bindhyachal Rai, Advocate
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
     ORAL JUDGMENT

Date : 04-01-2024

Heard Mr. Mahendra Prasad Verma, learned

counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner; Mr. Sunit Kumar,

learned counsel for the Magadh University; Ms. Rasika, learned

counsel for the Patliputra University; Mr. Bindhyachal Rai,

learned counsel for the Accountant General, Bihar and Mr.

Madhukar Mishra, learned AC to SC-16 for the State. Patna High Court CWJC No.17243 of 2022 dt.04-01-2024

2. The petitioner, who superannuated from the post

of Associate Professor, B. S. College, Danapur on 31.07.2020,

has filed the present writ petition seeking a direction upon the

respondents to grant all the retirement benefits, including the

GIC, arrears of salary and other dues.

3. In compliance of the order of this Court, a

counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondent nos. 2, 5

and 8.

4. A categorical assertion has been made that

admissible group insurance to the tune of Rs.61,243/- has

already been paid to the petitioner through Cheque no. 080945

dated 12.08.2023. Further the claim of the petitioner with

respect to arrears of salary were examined and admissible

amount to the tune of Rs.3,94,948/- has been credited to the B.S.

College, Danapur through cheque dated 06.12.2023 vide letter

no. 141 dated 07.12.2023 and instruction has also been given to

the Principal of B.S. College, Danapur to disburse Rs.3,94,948/-

to the petitioner.

5. At this juncture, it is submitted on behalf of the

petitioner that the amount has not been credited in the account

of the petitioner.

6. Considering the materials available on record Patna High Court CWJC No.17243 of 2022 dt.04-01-2024

and the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties, the

present writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the

Principal, B.S. College, Danapur to ensure payment of the

aforenoted amount to the tune of Rs.3,94,948/- preferably

within a period of one week from the date of receipt/production

of a copy of this order, failing which cost of Rs.25000/- shall be

realized from his pocket.

7. If the petitioner has still any grievance, he can

make proper representation before the concerned authority, who

shall consider the claim of the petitioner and dispose of the

same by a reasoned and speaking order.

(Harish Kumar, J) uday/-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                NA
Uploading Date          08.01.2024
Transmission Date       NA
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter