Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rajeshwar Paswan vs The State Of Bihar
2024 Latest Caselaw 331 Patna

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 331 Patna
Judgement Date : 12 January, 2024

Patna High Court

Rajeshwar Paswan vs The State Of Bihar on 12 January, 2024

Bench: Chief Justice, Rajiv Roy

         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                    Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16132 of 2023
     ======================================================
     Rajeshwar Paswan Son of Late Mahabal Paswan, Resident of Village-
     Bajpura, Post and P.S.- Belaganj, District- Gaya.

                                                              ... ... Petitioner/s
                                       Versus
1.   The State of Bihar through Collector, Gaya.
2.   The Circle Officer, Belaganj, Gaya.
3.   The Block Development Officer, Belaganj, Gaya.
4.   Keshari Nandan Singh, Son of Late Janak Singh, Resident of Mohalla- Front
     of IMA Road (IMA Hall) near Biskar Talaw, Office of District Education
     Officer, Sadar Gaya, District- Gaya- Pin Code- 823001, Mob No.
     7004803220.
5.   Anil Kumar Singh, Son of Late Janak Singh, Resident of Mohalla- Front of
     IMA Road (IMA Hall) near Biskar Talaw, Office of District Education
     Officer, Sadar Gaya, District- Gaya- Pin Code- 823001, Mob No.
     7004803220.
6.   Anjani Kumar, Son of Late Janak Singh, Resident of Mohalla- Front of IMA
     Road (IMA Hall) near Biskar Talaw, Office of District Education Officer,
     Sadar Gaya, District- Gaya- Pin Code- 823001, Mob No. 7004803220.
7.   Jitendra Kumar Singh, Son of Keshri Nandan Singh, Resident of Mohalla-
     Front of IMA Road (IMA Hall) near Biskar Talaw, Office of District
     Education Officer, Sadar Gaya, District- Gaya- Pin Code- 823001, Mob No.
     7004803220.

                                               ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s   :     Mr. Nagendra Sharma, Advocate
     For the Respondent/s   :     Mr. Sajid Salim Khan (SC-25)
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
             and
             HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
     ORAL JUDGMENT

(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

Date : 12-01-2024

The petitioner by the above Public Interest Litigation

seeks to raise the issue of encroachment upon the Sarv Sadharan

Anabad Bihar Sarkar where Devi Astal and Kachahari Bhawan

are said to be situated. The land is said to be situated just near Patna High Court CWJC No.16132 of 2023 dt.12-01-2024

the Belaganj Railway Station, Village- Bajpura, P.O. and P.S.-

Belaganj, District- Gaya and pertains to Khata No. 106, Plot No.

96 to 103. The petitioner seeks to relieve the land of the

encroachment. At the outset, it has to be observed that for

removal of encroachment there is an enactment in the State

enabling any person to approach the constituted authority;

which is the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act, 1956.

2. The Government has filed a counter affidavit,

wherein they have spoken of the specific plots on which

encroachment is claimed. Alleged Plot No. 96 and 100 are

raiyati lands which cannot be a subject matter of land

encroachment case. Private individuals are in possession and

ownership of the same, Plot No. 97 is Dev Asthal and Plot No.

99 is a pathway wherein there is no encroachment. Plot No. 98

and 102 stands recorded as Anabad Sarv Sadharan, whereas Plot

No. 103 stands recorded in the name of Bihar Sarkar. However,

Plot Nos. 98, 102 and 103 are covered by a decree of title

passed by the Munsiff III, Gaya under Title Suit No. 48 of 1983.

Based on this, DCLR Sadar Gaya has fixed the rent vide order

dated 16.02.2006, in Rent Fixation Case No. 04 of 2005-06.

Rent receipts are also produced.

3. Considering the averments in the counter affidavit, Patna High Court CWJC No.16132 of 2023 dt.12-01-2024

we are of the opinion that absolutely no case is made out by the

writ petitioner and in any event Public Interest Litigation cannot

be entertained for encroachment of lands.

4. The writ petition stands dismissed, however, with

the observation that we have not examined the title of the land,

as spoken of in the counter affidavit. There is no approval of the

decree passed by the Munsiff, in this proceeding. We have

noticed the same only to find no grounds to entertain a Public

Interest Litigation for the reliefs claimed.

(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ)

( Rajiv Roy, J)

Anushka/-

AFR/NAFR
CAV DATE
Uploading Date          15.01.2024
Transmission Date
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter