Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S S.S. Construction vs The State Of Bihar
2023 Latest Caselaw 5339 Patna

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5339 Patna
Judgement Date : 13 October, 2023

Patna High Court
M/S S.S. Construction vs The State Of Bihar on 13 October, 2023
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                            REQUEST CASE No.40 of 2023
     ======================================================

M/S S.S. Construction, Balbhadrapur, Laheriasarai, Darbhanga through its Proprietor Shyam Kishore Rai, aged about 63 years, Gender-Male, son of Late Jagdev Rai, Resident of S.S. Villa, Balbhadrapur, Laheriasarai, P.S. Laheriasarai, District-Darbhanga.

... ... Petitioner/s Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through its Principal Secretary, Department of Rural Works Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Engineer-in-Chief, Rural Works Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Superintending Engineer, Rural Works Circle, Darbhanga.

4. The Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department, Works Sub-Division, Jhanjharpur, District-Darbhanga.

5. The Assistant Engineer, Rural Works Department, Works Sub-Division, Jhanjharpur, District-Darbhanga.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

     For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr.Dudh Nath Singh, Advocate
     For the Respondent/s   :      Mr.Ajay (GA- 5)

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL JUDGMENT

Date : 13-10-2023

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. This application has been moved seeking

appointment of an Arbitrator invoking the powers of this Court

under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,

1996.

3. Petitioner and the respondent entered into an

agreement dated 02.05.2007 (Annexure-1). The said agreement Patna High Court REQ. CASE No.40 of 2023 dt.13-10-2023

contains an arbitration clause as Clause-25. The petitioner filed

representation before the Executive Engineer, Jhanjharpur vide

Annexure-3. Thereafter the petitioner also filed representation

before the Executive Engineer, Rural Work Department, Work

Division Darbhanga on 05.08.2008 (Annexure-4). However, the

said representations of the petitioner did not yield any fruit.

4. It is pleaded that the respondents have not settled

the dispute till date and the dispute is of civil in nature.

5. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents

specifically points out to Clause 25 of the agreement which

requires that the disputes or differences shall be referred for

adjudication through arbitrator appointed by Engineer-in-Chief

or the administrative head of the said P.W.D.

6. As of now, Section 12(5) of the Arbitration &

Conciliation Act, 1996 prohibits the appointment of an officer of

one of the parties. In such circumstances, the objection is not

well founded.

7. Today, there is no dispute about-(a) the legality,

validity and binding effect of the written agreement entered

into between the parties to the lis; (b) the existence of

arbitration clause contained therein; (c) the existence of

dispute(s) arising there from; (d) the dispute arising out of the Patna High Court REQ. CASE No.40 of 2023 dt.13-10-2023

agreement being civil in nature; (e) no legal impediment in the

adjudication of the dispute by the learned Arbitrator; (f) the

respondents having failed to settle the dispute.

8. In such circumstances, as agreed by the parties,

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shyam Kishore Sharma, a former Judge of

the Patna High Court, is appointed as learned Arbitrator to

adjudicate all disputes arising out of the agreement entered into

between the parties to the lis.

9. All pleas and issues raised, on merits, are left open

to be considered and decided by the learned Arbitrator.

10. The learned Arbitrator shall be entitled to fee as

per the schedule of the Act.

11. Since the dispute arises out of an agreement of

the year 2007, the hearing be expedited.

12. The issue of limitation, if any, is left open to be

raised before the Arbitral Tribunal.

13. Joint Registrar (List) is directed to

communicate the judgment to the learned Arbitrator.

14. Learned counsel for the parties also undertake

to communicate the judgment to the learned Arbitrator.

15. The Arbitral Tribunal shall issue notice to the

respondents.

Patna High Court REQ. CASE No.40 of 2023 dt.13-10-2023

16. The Request Petition stands disposed of in the

above terms.

(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ) P.K.P./-

AFR/NAFR
CAV DATE
Uploading Date          16.10.2023
Transmission Date
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter