Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5304 Patna
Judgement Date : 12 October, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14695 of 2023
======================================================
P K Traders and Supplier a Proprietary Concern having its Office at 16 Ground, 16 Chainpur, Kalyanpur, East Champaran, Bihar-845412 through its Proprietor Pravin Kumar Giri (Male, aged about 44 Years) Son of Daya Giri at Present Residing at RZK-2/357D, Behind Sun Sine Public School, Nihal Vihar, Nangloi, Nilothi, West Delhi-110041.
... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State of Bihar through Commissioner of State Tax, Bihar, Patna having its Ofice at Vikas Bhawan, Patna,
2. Addl. Commissioner of State Tax, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur.
3. Asst. Commissioner of State Tax, Motihari, Tirhut, Bihar.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. D.V.Pathy, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vikash Kumar ( SC-11 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
Date : 12-10-2023
1. The instant writ petition has been filed under
Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking multifarious
reliefs.
2. The petitioner essentially is desirous of
availing statutory remedy of appeal against the impugned order
before the Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as
"Tribunal") under Section 112 of the Bihar Goods and Services
Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as "B.G.S.T. Act").
3. However, due to non-constitution of the Patna High Court CWJC No.14695 of 2023 dt.12-10-2023
Tribunal, the petitioner is deprived of his statutory remedy
under Sub-Section (8) and Sub-Section (9) of Section 112 of the
B.G.S.T. Act.
4. Under the circumstances, the petitioner is also
prevented from availing the benefit of stay of recovery of
balance amount of tax in terms of Section 112 (8) and (9) of the
B.G.S.T Act upon deposit of the amounts as contemplated under
Sub-section (8) of Section 112.
5. The respondent State authorities have
acknowledged the fact of non-constitution of the Tribunal and
come out with a notification bearing Order No. 09/2019-State
Tax, S. O. 399, dated 11.12.2019 for removal of difficulties, in
exercise of powers under Section 172 of the B.G.S.T Act, which
provides that period of limitation for the purpose of preferring
an appeal before the Tribunal under Section 112 shall start only
after the date on which the President, or the State President, as
the case may be, of the Tribunal after its constitution under
Section 109 of the B.G.S.T Act, enters office.
6. This Court is, therefore, inclined to dispose of
the instant writ petition in the following terms:-
(i) Subject to deposit of a sum equal to 20 percent of the remaining amount of tax in dispute, if not already deposited, in addition to the amount deposited earlier under Sub-Section Patna High Court CWJC No.14695 of 2023 dt.12-10-2023
(6) of Section 107 of the B.G.S.T. Act, the petitioner must be extended the statutory benefit of stay under Sub-Section (9) of Section 112 of the B.G.S.T. Act. The petitioner cannot be deprived of the benefit, due to non- constitution of the Tribunal by the respondents themselves. The recovery of balance amount, and any steps that may have been taken in this regard will thus be deemed to be stayed. It is not in dispute that similar relief has been granted by this Court in the case of SAJ Food Products Pvt. Ltd. vs. The State of Bihar & Others in C.W.J.C. No. 15465 of 2022.
(ii) The statutory relief of stay, on deposit of the statutory amount, however in the opinion of this Court, cannot be open ended. For balancing the equities, therefore, the Court is of the opinion that since order is being passed due to non- constitution of the Tribunal by the respondent- Authorities, the petitioner would be required to present/file his appeal under Section 112 of the B.G.S.T. Act, once the Tribunal is constituted and made functional and the President or the State President may enter office. The appeal would be required to be filed observing the statutory requirements after coming into existence of the Tribunal, for facilitating consideration of the appeal.
(iii) In case the petitioner chooses not to avail the remedy of appeal by filing any appeal under Section 112 of the B.G.S.T. Act before the Tribunal within the period which may be specified upon constitution of the Tribunal, the respondent- Authorities would be at liberty to proceed further in the matter, in accordance with law.
(iv) If the above order is complied with and a sum equivalent to 20 per cent of the remaining amount of the tax in dispute is paid then, if there Patna High Court CWJC No.14695 of 2023 dt.12-10-2023
is any attachment of the bank account of the petitioner pursuant to the demand, the same shall be released.
7. With the above liberty, observation and
directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.
(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ)
( Rajiv Roy, J) Sunil/-
AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 13.10.2023 Transmission Date
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!