Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rajesh Kumar Yadav vs The State Of Bihar
2023 Latest Caselaw 5230 Patna

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5230 Patna
Judgement Date : 10 October, 2023

Patna High Court
Rajesh Kumar Yadav vs The State Of Bihar on 10 October, 2023
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                  Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14407 of 2023
     ======================================================

1. Rajesh Kumar Yadav son of Late Deep Narayan Yadav, Resident of Village-

Turki Ward No. 2 Police Station-Simari Bakhatiyarpur, Distt.-Saharsa.

2. Md. Imran, son of Idrish, Resident of Village-Tariyama, Ward No. 12 (Nusrath Chakla), Police Station-Simari Bakhatiyarpur, Distt.-Saharsa.

3. Randhir Kumar, son of Parmeshwar Sahu, Resident of Village-Tariyama, Ward No. 8, Police Station-Simari Bakhatiyarpur, Distt.-Saharsa.

... ... Petitioner/s Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Rural Development, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Rural Development, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director, Department of Rural Development, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Lokpal MANREGA District Rural Development Saharsa.

5. The District Magistrate, Saharsa.

6. The Programe Officer MANREGA, Simari Bhakhatyapur, Saharsa.

7. The Panchayat Secretary, Tatiyama Gram Panchayat, Simari Bhakhatiyarpur, Saharsa.

8. The Accountant MANREGA, Simari Bakhtiyarpur, Saharsa.

9. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Tariyama, Simari Bakhtiyarpur.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Prafull Chandra Thakur, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Smt. Binita Singh, SC-28 Mr. Nishant Jha, AC to SC-28 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY Date : 10-10-2023

The present Public Interest Litigation has been

preferred by the writ petitioners for a direction upon respondent

authorities to enquire into the financial irregularities being done

by the State agency under " MANREGA" scheme at Tatiyama

Gram Panchayat, Simari Bakhtiyar, Saharsa.

2. The petitioners claim themselves to be social Patna High Court CWJC No.14407 of 2023 dt.10-10-2023

workers espousing the cause of the common people. They claim

that Mahatama Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee

Act, 2005 (henceforth for short 'the MANREGA') is the scheme to

provide 100 days Guaranteed Wage Employment in every

financial year.

3. Further case is that the Union Rural Development

Ministry has given number of schemes that can be taken up under

'the MANREGA' which are as follows:

(i) rural drinking water project;

(ii) agriculture and allied activities;

(iii) rural sanitation project;

(iv) irrigation and flood management

works;

(v) live stock related works;

(vi) fisheries;

(vii) construction of Anganwari center

etc.

4. The allegation in the writ petition is that the local

respondents are misappropriating 'the MANREGA' fund which

has been brought to the notice to the Lok Pal under District Rural

Development Agency, Saharsa who also wrote a letter to the

Commissioner, 'the MANREGA', Rural Development Department, Patna High Court CWJC No.14407 of 2023 dt.10-10-2023

Bihar, Patna vide letter no. 88-1 dated 21.4.2023 drawing his

attention to the representation of the petitioners.

5. We have gone through the contents of the writ

petition. The petitioners have chosen to make allegation against

number of persons/respondent authorities and no document is on

record to substantiate the claim/allegation made therein. Further,

none of them have been made party respondent in this case so that

they can respond to the allegation(s).

6. If the petitioners have documents, the same can be

annexed with the complaint duly put on affidavit and can be

submitted before the appropriate authority, the Vigilance

Department, Bihar, Patna. Instead, on the vague allegation and

without any single document to support the same, this petition

has been filed.

7. The writ petition is misconceived, bereft of merit

and is accordingly dismissed.

(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ)

( Rajiv Roy, J) Ravi/-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                NA
Uploading Date          16.10.2023
Transmission Date
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter