Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5125 Patna
Judgement Date : 6 October, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12242 of 2023
======================================================
Dipti Mishra, aged about 36 years, Female, daughter of Late Shashi Bhushan Mishra, Resident of Village Kartahan, P.S.- Kartahan, Dist.- Vaishali.
... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat Building, Patna.
2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Energy, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Managing Director cum Chairman, Bihar State Power Holding Company Ltd., Vidyut Bhawan, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Patna.
4. The Managing Director, North Bihar Power Distribution Company Ltd., Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.
5. The Superintending Engineer, Electricity Supply Division, Muzaffarpur.
6. The Executive Engineer, Electricity Supply Division, Muzaffarpur.
7. The Assistant Engineer, Electricity Supply Division, Muzaffarpur.
8. Anima Mishra, Wife of Manoj Kumar Mishra Resident of Village- Kartahan, P.S.- Kartahan, Dist.- Vaishali.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Jai Vardhan Narayan, Advocate
For the State : Mr.Kinkar Kumar ( Sc 19 )
Mr. Zaki Haider, AC to C 19
For the NBPDCL : Mr. Kunal Tiwary, Advocate
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 06-10-2023 Heard Mr. Jai Vardhan Narayan, learned counsel
appearing on behalf of the petitioner; Mr. Kinkar Kumar,
learned SC-19 for the State and Mr. Kunal Tiwary, learned
counsel for the North Bihar Power Distribution Company
Limited.
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioner submits that the petitioner has given him instruction
that she is ready to file a detailed representation before Patna High Court CWJC No.12242 of 2023 dt.06-10-2023
respondent no.4, the Managing Director, North Bihar Power
Distribution Company Ltd. with respect to the relief, as claimed
for in the present writ petition. Learned counsel informs that the
petitioner is the biological daughter of the deceased employee
being born out of his second wife late Punam Mishra. It is
further informed that the deceased father of the petitioner had
also married earlier to late Veena Mishra, who pre-deceased
her husband.
3. In these backgrounds, learned counsel submits that
the mother of the petitioner, who had died after the death of the
deceased employee, became entitled for family pension.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State
submits that the question of legality of the marriage with the
deceased mother of the petitioner with the deceased employee
can only to be held void in absence of any evidence to that
effect that the deceased employee during his lifetime has sought
permission from his controlling officer to perform second
marriage. The claim being disputed question of facts cannot be
adjudicated under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
5. Considering the rival submissions of the parties, this
Court finds it proper to direct the Managing Director, North Patna High Court CWJC No.12242 of 2023 dt.06-10-2023
Bihar Power Distribution Company Limited to distribute the
retiral dues under different heads relating to the deceased
employee/ late Shashi Bhushan Mishra among his biological
sons, if any, and daughters in equal shares including the
petitioner and respondent no.8 within a period of six weeks.
6. The petitioner, if so advised, can avail appropriate
remedy before the competent civil court in accordance with law
for the family pension, which was to be paid to the mother of
the petitioner during her lifetime on account of the death of her
father in harness.
7. The respondent no.4, Managing Director, North
Bihar Power Distribution Company Limited, for the said
reason, will not delay in making payment of retiral dues of the
deceased employee to his biological sons, if any, and daughters
beyond the period of six weeks in accordance with law.
8. In case of failure, petitioner is at liberty to take
appropriate legal action against respondent no.4.
9. With aforesaid observations and direction, the writ
petition stands disposed of.
(Purnendu Singh, J) Sanjay/-
AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 07.10.2023 Transmission Date NA
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!