Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Manoj Kumar Das vs The State Of Bihar
2023 Latest Caselaw 5055 Patna

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5055 Patna
Judgement Date : 5 October, 2023

Patna High Court
Manoj Kumar Das vs The State Of Bihar on 5 October, 2023
    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                  CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.845 of 2018
   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-25 Year-2014 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Kishanganj
======================================================

Manoj Kumar Das S/o Satyanarayan Das, R/o Village- Majhiya Road Dharmganj, Ward No. 28, Police Station and District- Kishanganj.

... ... Appellant/s Versus The State Of Bihar

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr.Shri Krishna Sinha, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mrs. Anita Kumari Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH

ORAL JUDGMENT

Date : 05-10-2023

1. At the outset, it is submitted by Mr. Krishna Sinha,

learned counsel for the appellant Manoj Kumar Das that the

appellant has completely served his sentence and has been released

from the jail and now he does not want to pursue this appeal and

wants to withdraw the same.

2. The instant appeal has been filed against the

judgement of conviction dated 04.01.2018 and order of sentence

dated 12.01.2018 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-I-

cum- Special Judge, (POCSO Act, 2012), Kishanganj in Special

case No. 35/ 2014, whereby and whereunder the appellant has

been convicted for the offences punishable under Section 376(E)

of the IPC and under Section 4 of POCSO Act, 2012 and he has Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.845 of 2018 dt.05-10-2023

been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment of 10 years

under Section 376(E) of the IPC with a fine of Rs. 20,000/- and in

default of payment of fine, to further undergo one year

imprisonment and has also been sentenced to undergo rigorous

imprisonment of seven years under Section 4 of POCSO Act, 2012

with a fine of Rs. 10,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to

further undergo six months imprisonment and both the sentences

have been ordered to run concurrently.

3. The prosecution's allegation in brief is that on

07.05.2014, at about 7 PM, the informant's daughter (victim) aged

about 12 years went to a shop to buy mosquito coil but she did not

return back then the informant started searching for her and

thereafter at 9.30 PM the victim returned weeping and in the

morning she vomited 3-4 times and thereafter fell asleep and in the

next morning when she woke up she told the alleged occurrence to

her mother. According to victim's allegation, in the evening of

07.05.2014, the appellant/ accused asked her to bring some articles

to his house and at that time there was no other family member in

his house and when she went into his house then he raped her after

finding her alone in his house and after the commission of rape,

the accused/ appellant threatened her and forcefully feed her

sleeping pills.

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.845 of 2018 dt.05-10-2023

4. With the above allegations, the informant recorded her

fard bayan vide Exhibit-3 and on that basis formal FIR bearing

Kishanganj Mahila PS case No. 25/2014 was registered under

Section 376 of IPC and under Sections 4/8 of POCSO Act, 2012

and after the completion of investigation, the police submitted

charge sheet against the appellant for the alleged offences.

5. The appellant stood charged for the offences under

Section 376 of the IPC and under Sections 4/8 of POCSO Act.

During trial, altogether 10 witnesses were examined and in

documentary evidence, formal FIR, victim's medical examination

report, FSL report and applications for FSL examination etc. were

proved and marked as Exhibit 1 to 9 and thereafter the appellant's

statement u/s 313 of Cr.P.C. was recorded, in which he denied the

circumstances appearing against him from the prosecution's

evidences and claimed himself to be innocent and the appellant did

not give any evidence in his defence.

6. Heard learned APP for the State and perused the

judgement impugned and evidences available on the case record of

the court below.

7. The most important witnesses are the victim and her

mother. The victim was examined as PW 5 and she fully supported

the allegations made in the FIR against the appellant and alleged Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.845 of 2018 dt.05-10-2023

that the appellant, firstly, persuaded her to bring some articles from

the shop, when she brought the articles and went to appellant's

house to deliver the same then the appellant, who was alone at his

house at that time, bolted the door of his house from inside and

finding her alone, firstly, tied her hands and legs and then opened

her clothes and raped her and in that course he made her to take

some intoxicated pills. The said allegations made by the appellant

are completely relevant for which the appellant has been

convicted. PW 4, who happens to be mother of the victim, has

fully supported the said allegation and she and her husband, who

has been examined as PW 3, deposed that when the victim

returned back she was in an unconscious condition and she became

conscious two days after the alleged occurrence. Accordingly, the

evidences of PWs 3 and 4 are also in conformity with the

prosecution's story.

8. Though the medical evidence does not come in

support of the prosecution but ocular evidence given by the victim

herself is completely in support of the prosecution's story and from

the evidences of victim as well as her parents, I do not find any

reason on the part of the victim and her mother to make a false

allegation against the appellant and moreover, it is a settled Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.845 of 2018 dt.05-10-2023

principle of law that ocular evidence always prevails over the

expert's opinion.

9. Considering the above discussions as well as taking

into account the other materials available on the case record of

trial court, I find that the learned trial court has rightly convicted

the appellant for alleged offences hence, I do not find any reason

to interfere in the said conclusion. Accordingly, the instant appeal

stands dismissed.

(Shailendra Singh, J) BKS/-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                N. A.
Uploading Date          09.10.2023
Transmission Date       09.10.2023
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter